Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Paul Scott" wrote in message ... Is there a suitable/cost effective way of LUL using the additional spare platforms at Moorgate station once the Thameslink services no longer use the branch? I don't think so. LU already have two extra platforms at Moorgate that are rarely used so there is no reason why they would need another two. Peter Smyth |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why not burrow out to the east to join up with Crossrail (yeuk) and dive
down to the west to join up with Crossrail (yeuk). P.S. I don't like Crossrail! In article , Peter Smyth writes "Paul Scott" wrote in message ... Is there a suitable/cost effective way of LUL using the additional spare platforms at Moorgate station once the Thameslink services no longer use the branch? I don't think so. LU already have two extra platforms at Moorgate that are rarely used so there is no reason why they would need another two. Peter Smyth -- John Alexander, Remove NOSPAM if replying by e-mail |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 8 Jan 2006, John wrote:
In article , Peter Smyth writes "Paul Scott" wrote in message ... Is there a suitable/cost effective way of LUL using the additional spare platforms at Moorgate station once the Thameslink services no longer use the branch? I don't think so. LU already have two extra platforms at Moorgate that are rarely used so there is no reason why they would need another two. Why not burrow out to the east to join up with Crossrail (yeuk) and dive down to the west to join up with Crossrail (yeuk). Because digging two subsurface-to-deep portals in the middle of the City to exploit less than a mile of track isn't cost-effective. I've dreamed up any number of schemes like this to use the Moorgate stub, but the shallowness of the line pretty much clobbers all of them - anything they connected to would need to be subsurface or surface level, else it'd be cheaper and easier just to build a new deep-level tunnel instead, and there just isn't anything at that level in that area that it makes sense to connect to (unless the chance ever comes up to use the line as part of a link from Farringdon to Liverpool Street - rather unlikely!). The best idea i've heard is to use the stub for some sort of tram. P.S. I don't like Crossrail! Nor do i. And i like trams even less! tom -- Magic of a sufficiently advanced form is indistinguishable from science |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
They are used very often to reverse late running Mets, H&C and Circle
line trains during service disruption. If the cost was right it would be a good idea Peter Smyth wrote: "Paul Scott" wrote in message ... Is there a suitable/cost effective way of LUL using the additional spare platforms at Moorgate station once the Thameslink services no longer use the branch? I don't think so. LU already have two extra platforms at Moorgate that are rarely used so there is no reason why they would need another two. Peter Smyth |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Moorgate Thameslink platforms.... | London Transport | |||
My last Thameslink visit to Moorgate | London Transport | |||
Bakerloo Line beyond Harrow & Wealdstone | London Transport | |||
Travelling beyond ticket validity using Oyster (On DLR) | London Transport | |||
LT Heritage "Beyond the Fringe" | London Transport |