Is there a suitable/cost effective way of LUL using the additional spare
platforms at Moorgate station once the Thameslink services no longer use the
branch?

Paul

"Paul Scott" wrote in message
...
Is there a suitable/cost effective way of LUL using the additional spare
platforms at Moorgate station once the Thameslink services no longer use
the branch?

I don't think so. LU already have two extra platforms at Moorgate that are
rarely used so there is no reason why they would need another two.

Peter Smyth

DERWENT Moorgate beyond Thameslink
Sun, 8 Jan 2006 18:53:43 +0000 (UTC), "Paul Scott"


Is there a suitable/cost effective way of LUL using the additional spare
platforms at Moorgate station once the Thameslink services no longer use the
branch?


Fill in the bays and install shops - generate more revenue than any
actual trains.

PRAR
--
http://www.i.am/prar/ and http://prar.fotopic.net/
As long as people will accept crap, it will be financially profitable to dispense it. --Dick Cavett
Please reply to the newsgroup. That is why it exists.
NB Anti-spam measures in force
- If you must email me use the Reply to address and not

Paul Scott wrote:
Is there a suitable/cost effective way of LUL using the additional spare
platforms at Moorgate station once the Thameslink services no longer use the
branch?

Paul

Extend the DLR from Bank to Moorgate, Barbican and Farringdon.
Terminate at cross platform interchange on existing LUL carriage
sidings at Farringdon. Direct link from City Airport etc.

Why not burrow out to the east to join up with Crossrail (yeuk) and dive
down to the west to join up with Crossrail (yeuk).

P.S. I don't like Crossrail!

In article , Peter Smyth
writes

"Paul Scott" wrote in message
...
Is there a suitable/cost effective way of LUL using the additional spare
platforms at Moorgate station once the Thameslink services no longer use
the branch?

I don't think so. LU already have two extra platforms at Moorgate that are
rarely used so there is no reason why they would need another two.

Peter Smyth



--
John Alexander,

Remove NOSPAM if replying by e-mail

They are used very often to reverse late running Mets, H&C and Circle
line trains during service disruption. If the cost was right it would
be a good idea


Peter Smyth wrote:
"Paul Scott" wrote in message
...
Is there a suitable/cost effective way of LUL using the additional spare
platforms at Moorgate station once the Thameslink services no longer use
the branch?

I don't think so. LU already have two extra platforms at Moorgate that are
rarely used so there is no reason why they would need another two.

Peter Smyth

On Sun, 8 Jan 2006, John wrote:

In article , Peter Smyth
writes

"Paul Scott" wrote in message
...

Is there a suitable/cost effective way of LUL using the additional
spare platforms at Moorgate station once the Thameslink services no
longer use the branch?

I don't think so. LU already have two extra platforms at Moorgate that
are rarely used so there is no reason why they would need another two.

Why not burrow out to the east to join up with Crossrail (yeuk) and dive
down to the west to join up with Crossrail (yeuk).

Because digging two subsurface-to-deep portals in the middle of the City
to exploit less than a mile of track isn't cost-effective. I've dreamed up
any number of schemes like this to use the Moorgate stub, but the
shallowness of the line pretty much clobbers all of them - anything they
connected to would need to be subsurface or surface level, else it'd be
cheaper and easier just to build a new deep-level tunnel instead, and
there just isn't anything at that level in that area that it makes sense
to connect to (unless the chance ever comes up to use the line as part of
a link from Farringdon to Liverpool Street - rather unlikely!).

The best idea i've heard is to use the stub for some sort of tram.

P.S. I don't like Crossrail!

Nor do i. And i like trams even less!

tom

--
Magic of a sufficiently advanced form is indistinguishable from science

"Paul Scott" wrote in message
...

Is there a suitable/cost effective way of LUL using
the additional spare platforms at Moorgate station
once the Thameslink services no longer use the branch?

Put old trains in it and make it part of the Museum Of London at Barbican.

--
John Rowland - Spamtrapped
Transport Plans for the London Area, updated 2001
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...69/tpftla.html
A man's vehicle is a symbol of his manhood.
That's why my vehicle's the Piccadilly Line -
It's the size of a county and it comes every two and a half minutes

Paul Scott:
Is there a suitable/cost effective way of LUL using
the additional spare platforms at Moorgate station
once the Thameslink services no longer use the branch?

John Rowland:
Put old trains in it and make it part of the Museum Of London at Barbican.

Clever!
--
Mark Brader, Toronto "Truth speak from any chair."
-- Charlie Chan at the Wax Museum

Bob wrote:
Paul Scott wrote:
Is there a suitable/cost effective way of LUL using the additional spare
platforms at Moorgate station once the Thameslink services no longer use the
branch?

Paul

Extend the DLR from Bank to Moorgate, Barbican and Farringdon.
Terminate at cross platform interchange on existing LUL carriage
sidings at Farringdon. Direct link from City Airport etc.

Isn't the DLR at Bank a) too deep, b) facing the wrong way, and c)
blocked by the bank of England's vaults even if those two problems
could be overcome? I think that one might be a bit of a non-starter I'm
afraid.

Jonn