Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Matt Wheeler" wrote in message news ![]() "J. Chisholm" wrote in message ... Paul Scott wrote: "Bob" wrote in message oups.com... http://news.independent.co.uk/busine...icle337145.ece Something old something new. I wonder why they think the trains will be '... a cross between those used on the Underground and those operating on the rail network...'. All they need to be is normal main line stock with appropriate wide sliding doors, surely? AND Higher proportion of standing to sitting space (than suburban stock) NO need for Loos as most trips will be short (Just think how many standing passengers you could get in a disabled loo (;-) Which I would guess means the Bombardier bid is a modified 376 to include a pantograph. How will the pantograph help on the third rail system planned for the ELLX Phase 1? Possibly if ever extended along the NLL. Paul |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The East London Line is dead... Long live the East London Line | London Transport | |||
Wagn Rolling Stock | London Transport | |||
Wagn Rolling Stock | London Transport | |||
Rolling stock losses in the bombs | London Transport | |||
LUL rolling stock question | London Transport |