Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I see that Network Rail are imposing a blockade at Gunnersbury from
Saturday 1st to Sunday 9th April inclusive in order to relay the junction. Silverlink Metro and LU District Line services from Richmond to South Acton/Turnham Green will replaced by buses for the whole 9 days. Why does it take 9 days to replace a double-track junction? Have there been any recent replacements of similar junctions that have been done over a weekend, for example? -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard J. wrote:
Why does it take 9 days to replace a double-track junction? Have there been any recent replacements of similar junctions that have been done over a weekend, for example? The junction is in rather poor shape at the moment - while it is laid with flatbottom rail, the sleepers are all wood and fishplates abound. The chord to Acton Lane Junction used by the District is in exceedingly bad shape (it's all bullhead rail!) and the chord to Bollo Lane Junction suffers from a down line laid with wooden sleepers. Drainage in the area of the junction is also rather bad - a short panel between the trailing points of the junction and the trailing points of the crossover was removed and relaid because of wet beds. The lack of space under the overbridge probably also complicates matters. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
TheOneKEA wrote:
Richard J. wrote: Why does it take 9 days to replace a double-track junction? Have there been any recent replacements of similar junctions that have been done over a weekend, for example? The junction is in rather poor shape at the moment - while it is laid with flatbottom rail, the sleepers are all wood and fishplates abound. The chord to Acton Lane Junction used by the District is in exceedingly bad shape (it's all bullhead rail!) and the chord to Bollo Lane Junction suffers from a down line laid with wooden sleepers. I've no doubt the junction itself is in rather poor shape, which is why it's to be relaid. The plain line stretches to Bollo Lane and Acton Lane Junction could easily be relaid in weekend possessions. Drainage in the area of the junction is also rather bad - a short panel between the trailing points of the junction and the trailing points of the crossover was removed and relaid because of wet beds. The lack of space under the overbridge probably also complicates matters. Excuses, excuses. There were drainage problems at Victoria at the start of the District Line relaying works, which necessitated an extra weekend closure. And the lack of space under the overbridge is not exactly a rare occurrence (e.g. District Line tunnels). What I'm struggling to understand is why it's really necessary to suspend the heavily-loaded peak Richmond line services for a whole week. Or is it just Network Rail deciding it's more convenient for them to mount a blockade, and sod the passengers? -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard J. wrote:
I've no doubt the junction itself is in rather poor shape, which is why it's to be relaid. The plain line stretches to Bollo Lane and Acton Lane Junction could easily be relaid in weekend possessions. Indeed. I'm not suggesting that the reason for the blockade is to permit this to be done - I'm merely pointing out what the conditions are at the site. There were drainage problems at Victoria at the start of the District Line relaying works, which necessitated an extra weekend closure. And the lack of space under the overbridge is not exactly a rare occurrence (e.g. District Line tunnels). What I'm struggling to understand is why it's really necessary to suspend the heavily-loaded peak Richmond line services for a whole week. Or is it just Network Rail deciding it's more convenient for them to mount a blockade, and sod the passengers? That may very well be the case. Personally I don't quite understand why they need nine contiguous days to do it - four I could understand, seven would be a stretch, but nine? |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard J. wrote:
I see that Network Rail are imposing a blockade at Gunnersbury from Saturday 1st to Sunday 9th April inclusive in order to relay the junction. Silverlink Metro and LU District Line services from Richmond to South Acton/Turnham Green will replaced by buses for the whole 9 days. Why does it take 9 days to replace a double-track junction? Although the earlier posts in this thread established that there were some drainage problems, and limited clearance under the road bridge (not exactly unknown on the District Line), nobody could offer an explanation of why it will take 9 days. I'm reposting this, and crossposting to uk.railway, and would particularly like a response to the following question: Have there been any recent replacements of similar junctions that have been done over a weekend, for example? -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Gunnersbury signal | London Transport | |||
Liverpool Street Blockade - What can be seen? | London Transport | |||
Blockade of cross London Thameslink services from Saturday 11th September 2004 until 2005 | London Transport | |||
Kew Gardens and gunnersbury | London Transport | |||
Kew Gardens and Gunnersbury | London Transport |