Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yesterday's Evening Standard had as its main story that Ken Livingstone
was thinking of scrapping all bendy buses. I'm surprised that there has been nothing on this here. -- Thoss [To reply, replace * with . in Reply-To address] |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "thoss" wrote in message ... Yesterday's Evening Standard had as its main story that Ken Livingstone was thinking of scrapping all bendy buses. I'm surprised that there has been nothing on this here. -- Thoss Maybe because that wasn't what he said just the Standard's "spin" on it From someone who was at the "meeting" "He made it clear that he recognises they are not working -as well- on *some routes* compared to others, and that they were working very well on high volume short distance routes, but they are looking at the way they work on the longer routes, re-iterating that only 300 of 8,000 buses are bendy. This being in response to a question that wondered why double-deckers were not being used." Paul |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "thoss" wrote in message ... Yesterday's Evening Standard had as its main story that Ken Livingstone was thinking of scrapping all bendy buses. I'm surprised that there has been nothing on this here. -- I think people on here know, from bitter experience, to ignore every word that appears in that newspaper. It is so transparent that they have their own axe to grind, regardless of the truth, that reading their stories winds me up even when I agree with what they're saying! Jim |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 Paul wrote:
"thoss" wrote in message ... Yesterday's Evening Standard had as its main story that Ken Livingstone was thinking of scrapping all bendy buses. I'm surprised that there has been nothing on this here. -- Thoss Maybe because that wasn't what he said just the Standard's "spin" on it From someone who was at the "meeting" "He made it clear that he recognises they are not working -as well- on *some routes* compared to others, and that they were working very well on high volume short distance routes, but they are looking at the way they work on the longer routes, re-iterating that only 300 of 8,000 buses are bendy. This being in response to a question that wondered why double-deckers were not being used." Thanks for putting it in perspective. -- Thoss [To reply, replace * with . in Reply-To address] |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Jim wrote: "thoss" wrote in message ... Yesterday's Evening Standard had as its main story that Ken Livingstone was thinking of scrapping all bendy buses. I'm surprised that there has been nothing on this here. -- I think people on here know, from bitter experience, to ignore every word that appears in that newspaper. It is so transparent that they have their own axe to grind, regardless of the truth, that reading their stories winds me up even when I agree with what they're saying! I feel the same about the Standard, yet probably agree with them if they don't like bendy buses. Double-deck trains and bendy buses: two solutions looking for a problem. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "MIG" wrote in message oups.com... Double-deck trains and bendy buses: two solutions looking for a problem. Thats clever, I never thought of it like that. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2 Mar 2006 11:08:28 -0800, "MIG"
wrote: I feel the same about the Standard, yet probably agree with them if they don't like bendy buses. I wonder if they're used on the right routes - I don't use buses that often, but they do seem to have a habit of blocking junctions and generally getting in the way. However on some roads, mainly straighter, wider ones with relatively few junctions, they seem to work well. So maybe... the bus routes need reviewing and perhaps changing so that routes suitable for bendy buses are created. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 02 Mar 2006 21:19:38 GMT, Phil Clark
wrote in : I wonder if they're used on the right routes - I don't use buses that often, but they do seem to have a habit of blocking junctions and generally getting in the way. However on some roads, mainly straighter, wider ones with relatively few junctions, they seem to work well. So maybe... the bus routes need reviewing and perhaps changing so that routes suitable for bendy buses are created. A bit more attention to keeping parked cars off busy streets might help, too. For a while I travelled regularly on the 114 from Mill Hill Broadway to Harrow-otH; the bus was continually being blocked by oncoming traffic because parked cars made the road effectively one lane -- even on one stretch where most houses had a garage, a front yard, and a driveway crossing first a lawn, then a footpath, then even more lawn. If the streets along the route had been no-parking zones during the hours I travelled, the journey times would have been cut by 1/3 to 1/2. -- Ivan Reid, Electronic & Computer Engineering, ___ CMS Collaboration, Brunel University. ] Room 40-1-B12, CERN KotPT -- "for stupidity above and beyond the call of duty". |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Boltar" wrote in message
I actually quite like the bendy buses. They're very quick to board and get off. No crowding around the single narrow doorway with people half falling down the stairs like you get on a double decker. I actually agree on this, for the reasons stated above, however, I do feel that the problems that others have stated regarding the suitability of Bendys on some routes could do with review. Something long-distance and reasonably straight - the 207/607 (before they split them) would be (in my humble wotsit) be ideal - presumably this is why the route was chosen for the trials back in -erm- 2001? Cheers Matt |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dr Ivan D. Reid" typed
A bit more attention to keeping parked cars off busy streets might help, too. For a while I travelled regularly on the 114 from Mill Hill Broadway to Harrow-otH; the bus was continually being blocked by oncoming traffic because parked cars made the road effectively one lane -- even on one stretch where most houses had a garage, a front yard, and a driveway crossing first a lawn, then a footpath, then even more lawn. If the streets along the route had been no-parking zones during the hours I travelled, the journey times would have been cut by 1/3 to 1/2. Don't you just *love* Mollison Way? You didn't mention the lamentable progress the buses made on the days the bins were emptied, when things were even worse. I too have commuted on that stretch of the 114 route. -- Helen D. Vecht: Edgware. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
How bendy is a bendy bus? | London Transport | |||
bendy-buses Front-door entry for Oystercard | London Transport | |||
easy to fare dodge on new bendy buses | London Transport | |||
Safety of Bendy buses vs double deckers | London Transport | |||
Bendy buses - speed of boarding | London Transport |