Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
"Nigel Pendse" wrote: "Graeme Wall" wrote in message In message "Richard J." wrote: What makes you think it's moving? I was going to ask that, there are two stationary ones south of terminal 4. Ah, found it, there's one just off runway 23 at the north end. Seems an odd place to be, given it is not on the runway itself but on the 'hard shoulder'. 27R appears to be the landing runway, given there's an aircraft taking off from 27L. On the other hand there appears to be a queue of 5 aircraft in two lines heading for 27R The Concorde (G-BOAB) alongside Runway 23 is permanently parked there, and I always look out for it when taking off from 27R. It's one of the older Concordes and was already grounded (ie, effectively retired) when Concorde was retired, which is why it stayed at Heathrow. I'm not sure if they still plan to move it to somewhere in or by Terminal 5 when it's finished. Can't say I've ever noticed it but the last few times I've flown out of Heathrow have been at night. Strange they've parked it close to an active runway, even if it doesn't get used very often. See http://www.extrospection.com/archive...parked_at.html As for planes taking off and landing on the runways, remember that Google uses composite images which could easily show both 27R and 27L as takeoff runways, if one was taken in the morning and the other in the afternoon, even on the same day. Indeed, it would be perfectly possible for the same aircraft to be shown several times at Heathrow. True -- Graeme Wall This address is not read, substitute trains for rail. Transport Miscellany at http://www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail/index.html |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mike Hughes" wrote in message
Both 27 and their opposite 9) runways are interchangeable for landing and takeoff. It is not uncommon, particularly in the early mornings to see aircraft landing alternately on L and then R runways. There does appear to a regular pattern in that landings on the 27 are usually on the R in the morning and on the L in the evenings. (The taxi feeder park is next to the R and we get a lot of noise in the evenings from the takeoffs) Actually, while 27L and R are both used for takeoffs and landings, switching usually in the afternoons, it's a different picture when the 9's are in use: 09L is usually used only for landings, while 09R can be used for both takeoffs and landings. For example, when it's in use for takeoffs, an occasional T4-bound aircraft will be allowed to land on it. In the early mornings, there are lots of planes landing but few taking off, so you often see planes landing on both runways. |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Graeme Wall" wrote in message
Can't say I've ever noticed it but the last few times I've flown out of Heathrow have been at night. Strange they've parked it close to an active runway, even if it doesn't get used very often. 23 is no longer an active runway, or they couldn't have parked G-BOAB on the 'hard shoulder'. It's been a few years since that runway was last used -- I live near the flight path for it, and I can't remember when I last heard a plane on that route (it was always when there were strong cross winds). I last landed on it about four years ago, and as I recall, it was a very "lively" ride down. I don't think that runway is likely ever to be returned to use, as the proposed extended Heathrow East terminal will be built right over it, just as T3 covers one of the other original runways (in its early days, Heathrow had the standard RAF six runway pattern). |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
"Richard J." wrote: Graeme Wall wrote: In message [snip] 27R appears to be the landing runway, given there's an aircraft taking off from 27L. On the other hand there appears to be a queue of 5 aircraft in two lines heading for 27R No, 27L is the landing runway, and the plane on it has just landed and is turning right into one of the slip-roads or whatever they're called. Taxiways? So it is, I hadn't zoomed all the way in before and from a distance it looks as though it has just lifted off. -- Graeme Wall This address is not read, substitute trains for rail. Transport Miscellany at http://www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail/index.html |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Hughes wrote:
In message , Richard J. writes I think the plan is to move that Concorde into or next to Terminal 5 eventually. Runway 23 hasn't been used for years AFAIK. The aircraft stands beyond its southern end have to be cleared first before it can be used. 27R appears to be the landing runway, given there's an aircraft taking off from 27L. On the other hand there appears to be a queue of 5 aircraft in two lines heading for 27R No, 27L is the landing runway, and the plane on it has just landed and is turning right into one of the slip-roads or whatever they're called. Both 27 and their opposite 9) runways are interchangeable for landing and takeoff. It is not uncommon, particularly in the early mornings to see aircraft landing alternately on L and then R runways. There does appear to a regular pattern in that landings on the 27 are usually on the R in the morning and on the L in the evenings. No, it alternates weekly. This week it's as you describe, next week they'll land on 27L in the mornings and 27R in the evenings (if they are still on westerly operations). Full details of the pattern in every week this year are at http://www.heathrowairport.com/asset...ation_2006.pdf -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
#26
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
Mike Hughes wrote: In message , Richard J. writes I think the plan is to move that Concorde into or next to Terminal 5 eventually. Runway 23 hasn't been used for years AFAIK. The aircraft stands beyond its southern end have to be cleared first before it can be used. 27R appears to be the landing runway, given there's an aircraft taking off from 27L. On the other hand there appears to be a queue of 5 aircraft in two lines heading for 27R No, 27L is the landing runway, and the plane on it has just landed and is turning right into one of the slip-roads or whatever they're called. Both 27 and their opposite 9) runways are interchangeable for landing and takeoff. It is not uncommon, particularly in the early mornings to see aircraft landing alternately on L and then R runways. We appreciate that, just commenting on which runway was in use when the photos were taken. I'm confused by the bloke who claims there are three shots of the same plane on the runway, can't see more than one. Mind you I'm not using the Google Earth interface but Flash Earth which may have a different sibset of oictures. There does appear to a regular pattern in that landings on the 27 are usually on the R in the morning and on the L in the evenings. (The taxi feeder park is next to the R and we get a lot of noise in the evenings from the takeoffs) It's done to spread the noise out so the same people don't get all the noise all the time. -- Graeme Wall This address is not read, substitute trains for rail. Transport Miscellany at http://www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail/index.html |
#27
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
"Nigel Pendse" wrote: [snip] I don't think that runway is likely ever to be returned to use, as the proposed extended Heathrow East terminal will be built right over it, just as T3 covers one of the other original runways (in its early days, Heathrow had the standard RAF six runway pattern). I remember that, used to live at Bedfont very many years ago. -- Graeme Wall This address is not read, substitute trains for rail. Transport Miscellany at http://www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail/index.html |
#28
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"John Wright" wrote in message
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006 13:00:32 -0000, "Nigel Pendse" wrote: I don't think that runway is likely ever to be returned to use, as the proposed extended Heathrow East terminal will be built right over it, just as T3 covers one of the other original runways (in its early days, Heathrow had the standard RAF six runway pattern). I would not have said there was a standard, at least two ex-RAF airfields that I know of have all three runways intersecting at one point - Harwell in Oxfordshire and Dalcross near Inverness. If there is a standard it would be three runways not six - the original 1944 format of Heathrow was three runways later extended to six in a star of David formation. Sorry, I meant the standard RAF layout for six runway airfields (didn't most three runway airfields intersect in a triangle, not one point?). Of course, only two would ever be in use at one time, as piston-engined propeller aircraft were presumably less able to cope with cross-winds than modern jets. I can't remember the details, but didn't an off-track airliner hit the terminal buildings in Heathrow's early years, presumably when landing in a cross-wind? |
#29
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Graeme Wall wrote:
I'm confused by the bloke who claims there are three shots of the same plane on the runway, can't see more than one. Mind you I'm not using the Google Earth interface but Flash Earth which may have a different sibset of oictures. That bloke was me. Flash Earth uses Google Local (AKA Google Maps) for the Heathrow detailed aerial views, which has the "sibset of oictures" (!) with the updated image of the central section including most of the runways. It's Google Earth that currently still has the older image of the whole airport including four images of the plane approaching and landing on 09L. Only the first (leftmost) image is on Google Local, just to the west of the 09L runway threshold. It's an Air France A319. By the way, I've found yet another Concorde image at Heathrow on Google Local & Earth. In addition to the two at T4 and the one by runway 23 (not Google Earth), there's another one at the extreme eastern edge of the airport. It's at 51º 28' 20" N, 0º 24' 57" W, or search for Chaucer Avenue, Hounslow, UK. -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
#30
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Richard J." wrote in message
news ![]() By the way, I've found yet another Concorde image at Heathrow on Google Local & Earth. In addition to the two at T4 and the one by runway 23 (not Google Earth), there's another one at the extreme eastern edge of the airport. It's at 51º 28' 20" N, 0º 24' 57" W, or search for Chaucer Avenue, Hounslow, UK. Yes, now I see it too. Unlike the other three, this one is obviously moving, albeit distinctly subsonic, as it's being towed to the maintenance hangar. Given that only three (?) Concordes were in service at the end, this one may well be one of the two at the T4 gates in Google's images. I always used to look for Concordes round there when taking the bus from the long-stay car park to T4. Sadly, these days, there's never anything interesting round there any more. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Cambridge to London City Airport | London Transport | |||
Transportation option from London City Airport to Regents Park. | London Transport | |||
Transportation option from London City Airport to Regents Park. | London Transport | |||
Traffic from M4 to London City Airport? | London Transport | |||
White City station on Hammermith & City | London Transport |