asdf wrote:
On 27 Mar 2006 09:45:49 -0800, "MIG"
wrote:

What if I didn't have any prepay, but just the travelcard? Touching in
and out would never relate to my credit being charged, because I
wouldn't have any.

It's impossible to have a "prepay-less" card. Even if your prepay
balance is £0.00, you can still use prepay, and your balance will go
negative.

I thought I was confused, but now I'm not sure ...

I've never yet put any prepay on my Oyster, and I can't remember what
personal details I gave, although I didn't prove identity or anything.
It would seem odd if I could now run up a negative balance, but maybe I
should try.

I neglected to add that while your balance is negative, you can't use
your Travelcard (although if it expired anyway, I suppose you could
throw the card away at no loss).

I think the thing that generally bugs me is that while unstaffed or
ungated stations, or particularly determined evaders, exist, it is
possible for people to travel beyond their zones or without tickets,
and they may occasionally risk getting "caught".

But all the discussion has implied that someone who does pay TfL a load
of credit and makes an attempt to get it deducted by touching out at an
unstaffed destination may get clobbered by the Oyster system due to
something they didn't do earlier, while someone who just wanders out of
the station with no ticket or prepay credit won't.

If you end up with an unresolved journey from touching out without
having touched in (even if it's the result of your own error), you can
get it fixed at a Tube ticket office (if it's the most recent journey
on the card) or by phoning the Oyster helpline.

Of course, people who neither touch in nor out won't be charged for
their journey (how could they?), but they run the same risk of getting
caught as those who fail to buy tickets under a paper-ticketing
regime.

Why the extra burden of accusation and punishment for people who pay in
advance and make an attempt to debit their balance? This is perhaps
the nub of the kernel of key to the problem I am having with all this.
It's what I previously meant by "an artefact of Oyster".

As I tried to explain before, if you were allowed to travel outside
your zones without having touched in, the system would be wide open to
exploitation by fare dodgers (for journeys where at least one end
doesn't have barriers).


I understand this, and it is always the case if there are no staff and
barriers are open. But this system only punishes those who actually
try to pay for their journey by touching out.

I fear that it's the common situation of going for the soft targets who
can be "caught", rather than addressing any serious fare-evasion.

The slogan should be "Use Oyster so you'll be easy to target for
penalty fares if you make a mistake".