Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John
Thank you for this and I look forward to your feedback. There are several issues here. What you seem to be thinking of is track condition monitoring. This is well known on mainline railways, BR used to have a pair of trains which measured track condition by observing ride quality - an unexpected bump or sway generated a record, which was followed up, and a squirt of whitewash onto the track, so that the fault could be found on foot. BR tried to "do" the whole network on a regular basis. There is a quite separate technology which detects cracks by sending ultrasonic waves down into the rails, and if an echo is received BEFORE the echo from the bottom of the rail, it shows a discontinuity, ie a crack. To get accoustic coupling you have to put water between the accoustic head and the rail top, and this imposed a speed limit, so that detector trains couldn't keep up with general traffic, so had to be scheduled to run at night, very inconvenient! This is all very good and necessary. And there is also equipment for monitoring the condition of wheels, axles, etc. But I don't know of any railway operator who fits his trains (or trams, which are at rather greater risk of derailment because their tracks are so much more liable to interference) with equipment to detect when a derailment has actually occured. Regards Michael Bell ********************************** In article , JDikseun wrote: Anything that saves lives/prevents accidents must be a good idea, and deserves investigation. Monitoring trains is done to a very limited extent to evaluate ride quality - once every 2 months, I think - using portable equipment that is removed from the train after each journey. Which is a start. A couple of trains on each line could be instrumented permanently, this would give some sort of control over ride quality, and reduce the risk of derailment caused by track condition. Monitoring every train might be too expensive at this stage, but will probably become viable with future improvements in technology. I'll see what I can find on derailment info and get back to you. John -- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Claiming a refund after Camden Town derailment | London Transport | |||
Camden Town derailment - reduced refunds? | London Transport | |||
Another Tube derailment - Camden Town | London Transport | |||
another derailment | London Transport | |||
Another Tube Derailment | London Transport |