Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John B wrote:
MIG wrote: Why don't they genuinely improve reliability by doubling the track? How will that improve reliability with the present service? Not at all, if single track doesn't cause reliability problems. I am not actually proposing doubling, I am rejecting the "reliability" excuse for cutting services. The point is not that the services on the MHE branch are unreliable in themselves, it's that having an irregular sequence of trains coming from the northeast reduces reliability at Camden Town, messes about with train frequencies through central London, exacerbates problems on the line and leads to greater system-wide delays. ....and according to the article originally quoted, the service frequency to High Barnet will be increased as a result of the MHE changes, which means benefits to the four other stations north of Finchley Central. -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Crossrail Pudding Mill Lane Portal | London Transport | |||
Streatham Hill to Tulse Hill peak hour passenger services | London Transport | |||
Pudding Mill Lane | London Transport | |||
Whatever happened to the Mill Hill East extension? | London Transport | |||
Mill Hill East | London Transport |