Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
Before everyone gets a bit too carried away about how rubbish other systems are compared to the tube you might like to be interested in my experiences of the metro in Kiev, Ukraine which I had the pleasure to use for a while this month. A one month card which covers the whole system costs 25 Gryvna which is roughly 2 pounds 80 pence. This is for a service where the trains run every 2 mins 30 seconds the whole day. Of course, your average Ukrainian earns a lot less than your average Londoner. 45 times less, apparently, according to: http://www.statistics.gov.uk/cci/nugget.asp?id=285 (Average weekly earnings of £556 for Londoners, 2005) http://manila.djh.dk/Ukraine/stories/storyReader$5 (Average *monthly* earnings of US$100 for Ukrainians, 2000) That's about £53 per month versus £2409 per month. Based on this, a £2.80 pass to a Ukrainian is equivalent (ignoring the difference in the year of measurement) to an £127 ticket for a Londoner. The Kiev metro is nowhere near as extensive as the London Underground - it has 59km of route and 45 stations (compared to 408km and 275 stations). Zone 1 would be comparable; a Zones 1&2 monthly travelcard costs £85.30. Make of that what you will. -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 19 May 2006 Dave Arquati wrote:
Of course, your average Ukrainian earns a lot less than your average Londoner. 45 times less, apparently The average Londoner may earn 45 times more than the average Ukrainian. 45 times less than this is an awful lot of negative income. -- Thoss |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Arquati wrote:
http://manila.djh.dk/Ukraine/stories/storyReader$5 (Average *monthly* earnings of US$100 for Ukrainians, 2000) Well for a start that report is over 6 years out of date and secondly while that might possibly be true averaged as a whole over the country there is a lot of money floating about in Kiev , and I'm not just talking about the Mafia. Besides which , if everything cost 1/45th of that in Britain then your argument may hold water , but lots of things , eg mobile phones , radios, white goods, some foods, cost the same or more than they do in britain. The Kiev metro is nowhere near as extensive as the London Underground - it has 59km of route and 45 stations (compared to 408km and 275 stations). Zone 1 would be comparable; a Zones 1&2 monthly travelcard costs £85.30. Make of that what you will. Yeah , this argument is frequently trotted out as if size has any bearing on the running of a system. You might as well say that HSBC can't be expected to be run as well as Northern Rock because its so much bigger. If you have the staff & resources in place , clued up management and workers who treat their jobs as a priviledge , not a right , then it would all work smoothly. You don't, so it doesn't. And if you don't think thats a valid point, go check out the Moscow Metro. Its the busiest in the world and it runs just as well as the one in Kiev. B2003 |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
Dave Arquati wrote: http://manila.djh.dk/Ukraine/stories/storyReader$5 (Average *monthly* earnings of US$100 for Ukrainians, 2000) Well for a start that report is over 6 years out of date and secondly while that might possibly be true averaged as a whole over the country there is a lot of money floating about in Kiev , and I'm not just talking about the Mafia. Besides which , if everything cost 1/45th of that in Britain then your argument may hold water , but lots of things , eg mobile phones , radios, white goods, some foods, cost the same or more than they do in britain. I accept that the report is out of date. Deeper digging (link below from the IMF) has uncovered a figure for August 2004 of 604.2UAH, which is about £64 at current exchange rates (in the absence of an exchange rate for 2004). This is still 11.5% of London monthly wages (£2409). http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/scr/2005/cr0521.pdf Although I accept that averages cover up fluctuations across the country, the following ILO document (p46 in Acrobat Reader) suggests that Kiev workers have a lower wage than the Ukrainian average. It is out of date, but it shows that fluctuations go both ways. http://www.ilo.org/public/english/pr...cs/ukraine.pdf Finally, the key issue is that a Kiev ticket price of £2.80 is about 4.4% of monthly wages, whilst a London ticket for Zones 1&2 of £85.30 is about 3.5% of monthly wages. Those percentages can be compared, unlike the nominal values. If some goods cost the same or more than they do in Britain, that means that Ukrainians have *even less* to spend on transport. For example, if either buys a £30 radio, the Ukrainian has £34 left to spend that month (of which transport would be 8%) whilst the Londoner has £2379 left (of which transport would still be around 3.5%). The Kiev metro is nowhere near as extensive as the London Underground - it has 59km of route and 45 stations (compared to 408km and 275 stations). Zone 1 would be comparable; a Zones 1&2 monthly travelcard costs £85.30. Make of that what you will. Yeah , this argument is frequently trotted out as if size has any bearing on the running of a system. You might as well say that HSBC can't be expected to be run as well as Northern Rock because its so much bigger. If you have the staff & resources in place , clued up management and workers who treat their jobs as a priviledge , not a right , then it would all work smoothly. You don't, so it doesn't. I wasn't attempting to compare the running of the systems. I was only comparing the ticket prices, which seem nearly equivalent. The reason I "trotted out" the size of the system was that a travelcard on the Kiev metro can only realistically be compared to a Zones 1&2 travelcard in London because the London system is so much larger overall (thus making a comparison with a Z1-6 travelcard a fallacy). And if you don't think thats a valid point, go check out the Moscow Metro. Its the busiest in the world and it runs just as well as the one in Kiev. I am making no judgment about performance. I'd be very glad to check out the Moscow Metro if someone will buy me a ticket to Moscow... -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Arquati wrote:
Although I accept that averages cover up fluctuations across the country, the following ILO document (p46 in Acrobat Reader) suggests that Kiev workers have a lower wage than the Ukrainian average. It is Thats contrary to my experience. Even if that were true , well lets multiply the monthly card by 10. That still only makes it 28 quid. Still 1/5th that of london. metro can only realistically be compared to a Zones 1&2 travelcard in London because the London system is so much larger overall (thus making a comparison with a Z1-6 travelcard a fallacy). So what if its larger? One of the metro lines goes a good 6 or 7 miles out of the city centre. That would make it at least the same as zone 4 and if you take into account the fact that kiev is somewhat smaller than london it would make it the equivalent of zone 6. B2003 |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Arquati wrote:
It's very difficult to argue with less-than-anecdotal evidence and figures plucked out of thin air. Given that my fiances family live and work in Kiev I'm not entirely sure which bit you think is less than anecdotal. beyond comparison. Apples and oranges. £2.80 lets me travel round Brighton all day by bus; £3 lets me travel round London all day by bus. Does that mean Brighton is better value for money? So if LU only had the central line for example , you'd be quite happy for people to have monthly cards from epping that cost them a few quid? Since obviously the only criteria for you is how many lines there are. Incidentaly , the Moscow metro as I've said before is the busiest in the world. I remember a monthly card being about 450 roubles. Thats 9 quid at current exchange rates. I'm not quite sure where that leaves your argument but holed below the water line would be my thoughts. Unless you're going to insist thats a teensy ickle system compared to london too. B2003 |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
Incidentaly , the Moscow metro as I've said before is the busiest in the world. I remember a monthly card being about 450 roubles. Thats 9 quid at current exchange rates. I'm not quite sure where that leaves your argument but holed below the water line would be my thoughts. Unless you're going to insist thats a teensy ickle system compared to london too. a) compare Moscow workers' wages to London workers' wages (NB mean wage doesn't cut it - Moscow's plutocrats drive around in Mercedes so don't use the metro) b) compare historical and cultural traditions in the ex-USSR to those in the UK c) compare yourself to someone with a clue. Feel free to reflect on these comparisons and answer. Or preferably not. -- John Band john at johnband dot org www.johnband.org |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Quality reporting on Oyster PAYG | London Transport | |||
Boost your business with Quality Web & Design Services at BargainPrices! | London Transport | |||
'Dirtiest' tube line (air quality) | London Transport | |||
Quality Portuguese Translations | London Transport |