Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Have there been any examples in recent times of LU stations temporarily
becoming terminal points (e.g. because of engineering work) but which are virtually never used as potential terminal points at other times even when the timetabled service falls apart for whatever reason? Do train and platform destination signs just show "Special" or something similar when a really oddball terminal point comes briefly into operation? -- gordon |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote: Have there been any examples in recent times of LU stations temporarily becoming terminal points (e.g. because of engineering work) but which are virtually never used as potential terminal points at other times even when the timetabled service falls apart for whatever reason? Do train and platform destination signs just show "Special" or something similar when a really oddball terminal point comes briefly into operation? Hornchurch on the District is occasionally used in this fashion. I believe the train and platform destination indicators have continued to show Upminster (from the west), backed up by PA announcements to change at Hornchurch for alternative transport. IIRC, during a strike day several years ago, Hornchurch became a terminal point from the *east* - a truly token service! Chris |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Chris Read" wrote Hornchurch on the District is occasionally used in this fashion. I believe the train and platform destination indicators have continued to show Upminster (from the west), backed up by PA announcements to change at Hornchurch for alternative transport. IIRC, during a strike day several years ago, Hornchurch became a terminal point from the *east* - a truly token service! Is the crossover at Hornchurch still operational? I'm interested because it's one of a small(ish) number of crossovers on LU that I haven't managed to traverse. I seem to recall that it was refused for a railtour organised by the SEG, but that was several years ago. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
MIG wrote:
wrote: Have there been any examples in recent times of LU stations temporarily becoming terminal points (e.g. because of engineering work) but which are virtually never used as potential terminal points at other times even when the timetabled service falls apart for whatever reason? Do train and platform destination signs just show "Special" or something similar when a really oddball terminal point comes briefly into operation? Neasden on the Jubilee when there were works at Wembley Park. There was no problem with the display, but the word "Neasden" had to be recorded separately and inserted in the announcements. But it was recorded at a completely different volume and style, and came out as, eg "This is Canary Wharf. Change here for ... etc. This train terminates at NEEEEAS DEN." Maybe it was to indicate incredulity that trains were terminating there. The Jubilee Line uses two announcers. They improved the announcements about intermediate stations, but retained the original destination announcements which always sound like someone speaking to non-English-speaking 5-year-olds. Normally, it's most noticeable with "WILLesden GrEEEn". Your Neasden announcement was probably one of the original set, not one added for a non-standard destination. -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Richard J. wrote: MIG wrote: wrote: Have there been any examples in recent times of LU stations temporarily becoming terminal points (e.g. because of engineering work) but which are virtually never used as potential terminal points at other times even when the timetabled service falls apart for whatever reason? Do train and platform destination signs just show "Special" or something similar when a really oddball terminal point comes briefly into operation? Neasden on the Jubilee when there were works at Wembley Park. There was no problem with the display, but the word "Neasden" had to be recorded separately and inserted in the announcements. But it was recorded at a completely different volume and style, and came out as, eg "This is Canary Wharf. Change here for ... etc. This train terminates at NEEEEAS DEN." Maybe it was to indicate incredulity that trains were terminating there. The Jubilee Line uses two announcers. They improved the announcements about intermediate stations, but retained the original destination announcements which always sound like someone speaking to non-English-speaking 5-year-olds. Normally, it's most noticeable with "WILLesden GrEEEn". Your Neasden announcement was probably one of the original set, not one added for a non-standard destination. It's possible, but the only original desinations I remember were Stratford, North Greenwich, Willesden Green, Wembley Park and Stanmore. I think they only used Neasden as a destination during the works. Could be wrong. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
South Central franchise - key points | London Transport | |||
South Central franchise - key points | London Transport | |||
South Central franchise - key points | London Transport | |||
Service Distribution To Terminal Points | London Transport | |||
points Concorde! | London Transport |