Justa Lurker writes
| Might that not be simply because 'Angel is on a damn great hill'?

The hill on the surface is compensated for by putting the station
further underground. Surface terrain is not the same as the levels
they have chosen to place the rails at.

That was precisely my point. As was made perfectly clear in the part
that you snipped.

--
Dave

It was Thu, 31 Jul 2003 00:12:32 +0100, and Dave
wrote in uk.transport.london:
| The hill on the surface is compensated for by putting the station
| further underground. Surface terrain is not the same as the levels
| they have chosen to place the rails at.
|
| That was precisely my point. As was made perfectly clear in the part
| that you snipped.

I snipped no word that you authored.

JL


----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

Justa Lurker writes
| The hill on the surface is compensated for by putting the station
| further underground. Surface terrain is not the same as the levels
| they have chosen to place the rails at.
|
| That was precisely my point. As was made perfectly clear in the part
| that you snipped.

I snipped no word that you authored.

You snipped the context - as you well know. There's no need to try and
be a clever **** about it.

The previous poster said; "On the other hand, Angel station is very much
further underground."

I replied "Might that not be simply because 'Angel is on a damn great
hill'?"

And you added "The hill on the surface is compensated for by putting the
station further underground".

There you are.

--
Dave

It was Thu, 31 Jul 2003 10:18:45 +0100, and Dave
wrote in uk.transport.london:
| I snipped no word that you authored.
|
| You snipped the context - as you well know.
| There's no need to try and be a clever **** about it.

Sorry, your holiness. I didn't mean to offend your sensitivities.
Take a pill. Take several. It's only usenet. People respond to
clarify your posts. It happens. Get over it or get a life.

JL


----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

Justa Lurker writes
It was Thu, 31 Jul 2003 10:18:45 +0100, and Dave
wrote in uk.transport.london:
| I snipped no word that you authored.
|
| You snipped the context - as you well know.
| There's no need to try and be a clever **** about it.

Sorry, your holiness. I didn't mean to offend your sensitivities.

Oh don't worry, you didn't.

People respond to clarify your posts.

Oh right. You were just clarifying it were you? Jolly Good. It's such
a good thing that there are people round here to help out.

Have a gold star.

--
Dave