Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Paul Weaver wrote: Richard M Willis wrote: Why does routine payment of a PF constitute evidence for prosecution ? There's no law against deliberately paying a PF and doing so every journey. Indeed, you might decide that you usually get a seat in standard class, therfore have a standard ticket. Then one day there are no seats available, so you sit in first class and penalty-upgrade on train, as over the year it's cheaper than a first season, as you dont need it very often, but dont know in advance when you do. To constitute evidence, they'd have to observer the persun paying a PF "every so often", and then having covert cameras (with NO RPIs checking tickets), to prove that the persun was attempting to pay ONLY WHEN CHALLENGED. If there is no one to buy the ticket (at whatever fare) from on the train, or your end station, what should you do? Penalty fares are not applicable if there is no opportunity to pay in advance. If someone was routinely paying penalty fares, they must have been applicable*, and therefore he must have had the opportunity. This is the routine behaviour that I am talking about, ie the not paying at the ticket office. The authorities would reasonably question the likelihood of someone willingly paying a PF every day when there was an opportunity to pay less at the ticket office, unless they "got away with it" often enough to make it cheaper overall. *Actually this isn't quite true. The best chance of disputing a penalty fare is on the grounds that it was issued incorrectly. Given the rules about signage and so on, one would probably find that a large proportion of them were. |
#42
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard M Willis wrote:
I have been repeatedly and explicitly told by PF inspectors and the like that you can board a train purposely without purchasing a ticket as long as you have no INTENTION to defraud, and are prepared to pay the PF (which I am). http://www.arrivatrainswales.co.uk/u...ments/1263.pdf Section 17.1 should do it:- "17. Compulsory Ticket Areas (1) No person shall enter a compulsory ticket area on the railway unless he has with him a valid ticket." or 18.1:- "18. Ticketless travel in non-compulsory ticket areas (1) In any area not dedicated as a compulsory ticket area, no person shall enter any train for the purpose of travelling on the railway unless he has with him a valid ticket entitling him to travel." However, it seems there may be a mitigation, in that both sections contain a list of exceptions to the rule, in that... "No person shall be in breach of [either of these] if; - there were no facilities in order for the issue or validation of any[1] ticket at the time when, and at the station where, he began his journey; or - there was a notice at the station where he began his journey permitting journeys to be started without a valid ticket; or - an authorised person gave him permission to travel without a valid ticket". I suppose that the third point above would mean you could travel and pay the PF legally only if you asked permission to do so before either boarding or entering the Compulsory Ticket Area, as applicable. [1] I don't like the wording of this bit, as it implies that if there's a machine selling tickets in the opposite direction to the way you're going, or not selling Railcard tickets, or not accepting notes for a large fare etc, it isn't reasonable to pay on the train. This is rather silly, unless of course you are Nederlandse Spoorwegen. If what you say is true, then it is indeed a nonsense situation: we should not have the situation where someone has breached the law and they can escape prosecution simply by paying for a (more expensive) ticket. If you contravene the law, you should be prosecuted. There should not be two ways about it. Agreed. I would personally rather, however, that they decriminalised ticketless travel and enforced it in a similar way to parking offences. I wish they'd barrier the whole damn network and make ticket-purchasing universal. (i.e. you can get ANY ticket FROM any station TO any station, including all the weird combinations/addons/conditions you can get now. You should be able to get any ticket from any station that has a fares manual and an APTIS (or the more modern versions), give or take PTE-area tickets on dedicated manually-issued stock. Simplification would be better, though; there is no need for the hundreds of ticket types that exist at present. The trouble is unstaffed stations and paying on board, where this isn't necessarily the case. You couldn't feasibly barrier everywhere - what about Altnabreac in Scotland, that gets a passenger per week or so? Neil |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
fare evasion penalties | London Transport | |||
Bendy Buses & Fare Evasion | London Transport | |||
Oyster fare evasion | London Transport | |||
Thameslink Fare Evasion | London Transport | |||
Fare evasion | London Transport |