London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #41   Report Post  
Old June 21st 06, 08:57 PM posted to uk.transport.london
MIG MIG is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,154
Default New style barriers and fare evasion


Paul Weaver wrote:
Richard M Willis wrote:
Why does routine payment of a PF constitute evidence for prosecution ?
There's no law against deliberately paying a PF and doing so every journey.


Indeed, you might decide that you usually get a seat in standard class,
therfore have a standard ticket. Then one day there are no seats
available, so you sit in first class and penalty-upgrade on train, as
over the year it's cheaper than a first season, as you dont need it
very often, but dont know in advance when you do.

To constitute evidence, they'd have to observer the persun paying a
PF "every so often", and then having covert cameras (with NO RPIs checking
tickets), to prove that the persun was attempting to pay ONLY WHEN
CHALLENGED.


If there is no one to buy the ticket (at whatever fare) from on the
train, or your end station, what should you do?



Penalty fares are not applicable if there is no opportunity to pay in
advance. If someone was routinely paying penalty fares, they must have
been applicable*, and therefore he must have had the opportunity.

This is the routine behaviour that I am talking about, ie the not
paying at the ticket office. The authorities would reasonably question
the likelihood of someone willingly paying a PF every day when there
was an opportunity to pay less at the ticket office, unless they "got
away with it" often enough to make it cheaper overall.


*Actually this isn't quite true. The best chance of disputing a
penalty fare is on the grounds that it was issued incorrectly. Given
the rules about signage and so on, one would probably find that a large
proportion of them were.


  #42   Report Post  
Old June 21st 06, 09:14 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Nov 2005
Posts: 638
Default New style barriers and fare evasion

Richard M Willis wrote:

I have been repeatedly and explicitly told by PF inspectors and the
like that you can board a train purposely without purchasing a ticket
as long as you have no INTENTION to defraud, and are prepared to
pay the PF (which I am).


http://www.arrivatrainswales.co.uk/u...ments/1263.pdf

Section 17.1 should do it:-

"17. Compulsory Ticket Areas
(1) No person shall enter a compulsory ticket area on the railway
unless he has with him a valid ticket."

or 18.1:-

"18. Ticketless travel in non-compulsory ticket areas
(1) In any area not dedicated as a compulsory ticket area, no person
shall enter any train for the purpose of travelling on the railway
unless he has with him a valid ticket entitling him to travel."

However, it seems there may be a mitigation, in that both sections
contain a list of exceptions to the rule, in that...

"No person shall be in breach of [either of these] if;
- there were no facilities in order for the issue or validation of
any[1] ticket at the time when, and at the station where, he began his
journey; or
- there was a notice at the station where he began his journey
permitting journeys to be started without a valid ticket; or
- an authorised person gave him permission to travel without a valid
ticket".

I suppose that the third point above would mean you could travel and
pay the PF legally only if you asked permission to do so before either
boarding or entering the Compulsory Ticket Area, as applicable.

[1] I don't like the wording of this bit, as it implies that if there's
a machine selling tickets in the opposite direction to the way you're
going, or not selling Railcard tickets, or not accepting notes for a
large fare etc, it isn't reasonable to pay on the train. This is
rather silly, unless of course you are Nederlandse Spoorwegen.

If what you say is true, then it is indeed a nonsense situation: we should
not have the situation where someone has breached the law and they can
escape prosecution simply by paying for a (more expensive) ticket.
If you contravene the law, you should be prosecuted. There should not
be two ways about it.


Agreed. I would personally rather, however, that they decriminalised
ticketless travel and enforced it in a similar way to parking offences.

I wish they'd barrier the whole damn network and make ticket-purchasing
universal. (i.e. you can get ANY ticket FROM any station TO any station,
including all the weird combinations/addons/conditions you can get now.


You should be able to get any ticket from any station that has a fares
manual and an APTIS (or the more modern versions), give or take
PTE-area tickets on dedicated manually-issued stock. Simplification
would be better, though; there is no need for the hundreds of ticket
types that exist at present.

The trouble is unstaffed stations and paying on board, where this isn't
necessarily the case. You couldn't feasibly barrier everywhere - what
about Altnabreac in Scotland, that gets a passenger per week or so?

Neil



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
fare evasion penalties evan London Transport 33 March 19th 07 09:16 PM
Bendy Buses & Fare Evasion CJB London Transport 34 July 7th 06 09:48 AM
Oyster fare evasion Peter Smyth London Transport 41 June 23rd 06 04:56 PM
Thameslink Fare Evasion Zac London Transport 22 October 2nd 04 10:05 PM
Fare evasion Monnie London Transport 2 June 11th 04 05:14 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:11 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017