Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Arquati wrote:
No - it's not technically as Richard said. All that is certain is that for certain pairs of stations, journeys are defined as using Zone 1 even if a route avoiding Z1 would be possible. Earl's Court to Notting Hill Gate is certainly one of those cases. I have also tried Shepherd's Bush (Central) to Parsons Green, which is also defined as via Zone 1. But what if touch the platform validator at ealing broadway en-route? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Weaver wrote:
Dave Arquati wrote: No - it's not technically as Richard said. All that is certain is that for certain pairs of stations, journeys are defined as using Zone 1 even if a route avoiding Z1 would be possible. Earl's Court to Notting Hill Gate is certainly one of those cases. I have also tried Shepherd's Bush (Central) to Parsons Green, which is also defined as via Zone 1. But what if touch the platform validator at ealing broadway en-route? Good point - but since that is intended for passengers transferring to and from FGW, you might just end up with an unresolved journey (i.e. Earl's Court to Ealing Bdy plus Unresolved - NHG) and would be charged twice. -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 20:04:06 +0100, Dave Arquati wrote:
No - it's not technically as Richard said. All that is certain is that for certain pairs of stations, journeys are defined as using Zone 1 even if a route avoiding Z1 would be possible. Earl's Court to Notting Hill Gate is certainly one of those cases. I have also tried Shepherd's Bush (Central) to Parsons Green, which is also defined as via Zone 1. But what if touch the platform validator at ealing broadway en-route? Good point - but since that is intended for passengers transferring to and from FGW, you might just end up with an unresolved journey (i.e. Earl's Court to Ealing Bdy plus Unresolved - NHG) and would be charged twice. I'm not sure that's what would happen. The logic used by some validators is a bit more complicated - they can either act as entry, exit, or neither, depending on what's already on the card (and perhaps what validators, if any, you touch later on). The notice by the platform validators usually just asks all passing PAYG users to touch their card on the reader, regardless of whether or not they're starting/ending the journey, so it "ought" to do the right thing in all scenarios. But I'm not sure if this one will be catered for. My bet is that you'd simply end up with an Earl's Court to NHG journey at the usual (Z1) fare. But I think we'll only know for sure if someone actually goes out and tries it... |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Transport for London created a system that by its nature lends itself
to exploitation by opportunists, ie fare evaders! This isn't Japan or Singapore. People will have a go if they feel they can gain an advantage. The only advantage is that drivers carry less cash and much the money paid on the spot for a journey is left in a machine by the bus stop. Not too sure, but the amount of incidents of people being done for fare evasion is setting a mini record. Well done, TfL............ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
fare evasion penalties | London Transport | |||
Bendy Buses & Fare Evasion | London Transport | |||
New style barriers and fare evasion | London Transport | |||
Thameslink Fare Evasion | London Transport | |||
Fare evasion | London Transport |