Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kev wrote:
But then when do the train operators ever give a toss about the passengers. I suppose the hope is that people who use Kilburn High Rd and South Hampstead will get so ****ed off they will find other routes and then these two stations can be closed. So that will free up capacity at Euston, two sites that can be sold for development, two stations that don't have to be staffed or maintained and a bunch of passengers who have to find an alternative route to work. A success story all round. Now where I have I heard the one about running services down before. I'll give Queens Park to the NLL 2 or 3 years then that will go the way of Croxley ang the Graham Rd curve. I work near South Hampstead station. It's currently completely useless to me. The new service will make it useful to me. I don't know how many people like me there are compared to the number of people who work at Euston and commute from KHR or SH, but I suspect the latter number at least isn't large. And if they work elsewhere than Euston, the new service won't make life any harder for them. Remember in the 1980s when Broad St was closed? I'm sure you would have said "the new Richmond-North Woolwich link is just a case of running services down; I'll give it 2 years before the whole lot is closed; obviously everyone wants to go to the City not to the depths of the East End". -- john Band john at johnband dot org www.johnband.org |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard M Willis wrote:
If LUL really want to goto Watford Junction, they might do better than actually getting the Metro Line connected to the old Croxley Green spur (the one whose rails have been lifted, but which isn't officially closed) The plan is to do both. However, the Croxley link is dependent on Hertfordshire Country Council, who are arguably less PT-friendly than TfL. http://www.tfl.gov.uk/tube/company/p...ley-rail-link/ -- John Band john at johnband dot org www.johnband.org |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 23 Jun 2006 02:35:31 -0700, John B wrote:
If LUL really want to goto Watford Junction, they might do better than actually getting the Metro Line connected to the old Croxley Green spur (the one whose rails have been lifted, but which isn't officially closed) The plan is to do both. However, the Croxley link is dependent on Hertfordshire Country Council, who are arguably less PT-friendly than TfL. http://www.tfl.gov.uk/tube/company/p...ley-rail-link/ It's also dependent on the DfT, who are the ones holding things up at the moment. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
In the Oyster age, what does "Tickets valid on local buses" mean? | London Transport | |||
Oyster (and Travelcards) valid on Heathrow Express! | London Transport | |||
Marylebone (LU) - Marylebone (NR) : Valid OOS Oyster interchange ? | London Transport | |||
Using Oyster on Valid NR Services | London Transport | |||
Zone passes valid on Night Buses? | London Transport |