| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
 |
|
Menu
| London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
| Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
| London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
| Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
June 28th 06, 07:39 AM
posted to uk.transport.london
|
|||
|
|||
Stagecoach London Sale
"Ian Jelf" wrote in message On a slightly related note, does anyone know the rationale behind TfL proscribing the prefix "Sorry" before "Not in service"? It seems such a strange thing to remove (or to go to the bother of removing). Seems a very sensible thing to remove, to me. A computer can not be "sorry". I wish they'd do the same thing on the autoannouncers as well. Richard [in SG19] -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
|
#2
June 28th 06, 09:15 AM
posted to uk.transport.london
|
|||
|
|||
|
Stagecoach London Sale
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 08:39:25 +0100, "Richard M Willis"
wrote: "Ian Jelf" wrote in message On a slightly related note, does anyone know the rationale behind TfL proscribing the prefix "Sorry" before "Not in service"? It seems such a strange thing to remove (or to go to the bother of removing). Seems a very sensible thing to remove, to me. A computer can not be "sorry". I wish they'd do the same thing on the autoannouncers as well. Indeed. "We are sorry" or "Southern is sorry" is fine. "I am sorry" really ****es me off. Or did, when I still used Southern. -- James Farrar . @gmail.com |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Stagecoach Smart ITSO cards | London Transport | |||
| Stagecoach buys East London Bus Group | London Transport | |||
| Stagecoach win East Midlands franchise | London Transport | |||
| Stagecoach, bus piracy and TfL | London Transport | |||
| Top customer service from Stagecoach | London Transport | |||
Hybrid Mode
