Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Richard M Willis wrote: "Mizter T" wrote in message You need not touch in or out if you However if you're going to travel out-of-zone on the Underground - i.e. go beyond the zones that are covered by your Travelcard - then you'll need to ensure you touch-in at the beginning of your journey, and touch-out at the end. This is because you are combining the Travelcard with the Oyster Pre-Pay function (the Pre-Pay function provides the ticket extension for your out-of-zone travels). I wonder how this works for those situations where the "official" routing for a journey involves zone 1, but you want to do it without going through zone 1. I had someone from Oyster explain to me the other day that Oyster fares don't necessarily follow zonal conventions. She gave the example of traveling from Saint John's Wood to South Ealing, saying that "The System" assumed such a journey would be made through zone 1, even if you managed to do it without going through zone 1. First and obvious point - most people would not choose to go that way. I certainly wouldn't advise that as a route! But it's an interesting academic question. She said that if you have a Z2345 travelcard and you travel from SJW to SE via the Jub/Metro and Rayner's Lane lines, you need to pay for zone 1 even though you don't use it. I think it's fair enough for the system designers to assume that with this example the route taken would be via zone 1 on the Central Line. I guess if you did want to go via Rayner's Lane then you can ensure you don't pay for zone 1 by exiting and re-entering the station via the gates - thus ensuring the system knows what you're doing. This seems to throw up a contradiction: a) if you have a Z2345 TC, you don't have to touch in/out so if you go that route you have a valid ticket all the way. b) if you have a Z2345 TC and *do* touch in/out, Oyster will charge you for a zone 1 journey which you don't have on your TC, so will take it out of your PP balance. In reply to (a) at St John's Wood you'd be forced to touch-in most of the time as you'd have to go through the gates. If so, then exit and re-enter at Rayner's Lane. If the gates are open, you could *not* touch-in and continue to travel via Rayner's Lane legitimately. In reply to (b) - that's because of the assumption built into the system, which in the case of the example given is, as I've said already, fair enough! This doesn't seem right to me. Can anyone else explain how zones and Oyster PP interact ? It seems as if it hasn't been throught through properly. I think the system has been thought through in a very detailed way, and any assumptions it makes would be regarded as reasonable by most people. The potential complexity comes when Oyster Pre-Pay is implemented London-wide on National Rail (NR). The possible issues here would be similar to the above, where an A to B journey could go via C or D where changing at D might be a slower but cheaper route than changing at C - (similar to the 'route -not London' tickets that are already sold by NR). The solution I guess would be to have Oyster readers at the station that passengers must touch whilst they change trains. The difficulty comes in trying to communicate this simply to passengers. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Guerilla advertising hits the 'Barclays' hire bikes already... | London Transport | |||
New platform advertising panels | London Transport | |||
"The Big Freeze" - dodgy advertising? | London Transport | |||
email extractor , site , solutions , email based marketing , email marketing solution , email extractor , newsletter software , mass email , e-mail marketing , email marketing solutions , bulk email software , web advertising , email marketing , mark | London Transport | |||
False name & address on Oyster - any problems? | London Transport |