Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Rich Mackin wrote: "Paul Ebbens" wrote in message ... "Mark B" wrote in message ... Paul G wrote: I thought TOC's were free to call themselves what they like - without having to seek approval from Ken... Do wonder if he'd rather have the trains painted in London Rail Brown/Orange with roundels... First Neon City or London Turd?* *which would probably spread to all trains serving the capital, like all buses operating services classed as London must be red... I thought Thameslink was around before branding? or did the King's Cross TL station only appear after franchising? Nope, the route was branded 'Thameslink', including all the same stations as they are today, by NSE from opening in May 1987. Very sensitive about the name of the Franchise are First. People leaving FGW to go work there commonly refer to it as "Going to work for Barclaycard" (name sounds like a credit card). One person overheard saying this was taken aside and "advised". More power to Kens elbow I say. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Very sensitive about the name of the Franchise are First.
I don't know why so, the lack of a distinguished brand and plastering of "National Express" all over their bus & rail operations, along with the same for Stagecoach's rail operations & certain bus operations (MagicBus/MegaBus/et al.) hasn't really harmed the companies' share prices, has it? |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In uk.railway Joe Patrick wrote:
I don't know why so, the lack of a distinguished brand and plastering of "National Express" all over their bus & rail operations, along with the same for Stagecoach's rail operations & certain bus operations (MagicBus/MegaBus/et al.) hasn't really harmed the companies' share prices, has it? Stagecoach seem to be a bit confused about this one. They used to heavily brand 'Stagecoach SWT' but have dropped the 'Stagecoach' bit, but it's very definitely 'Stagecoach Island Line'. Any ideas why? Theo |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Theo Markettos wrote: In uk.railway Joe Patrick wrote: I don't know why so, the lack of a distinguished brand and plastering of "National Express" all over their bus & rail operations, along with the same for Stagecoach's rail operations & certain bus operations (MagicBus/MegaBus/et al.) hasn't really harmed the companies' share prices, has it? Stagecoach seem to be a bit confused about this one. They used to heavily brand 'Stagecoach SWT' but have dropped the 'Stagecoach' bit, but it's very definitely 'Stagecoach Island Line'. Any ideas why? Theo Virgin is much into branding though. The London and the South East diagram goes along with this to the extent of having only one colour for Virgin, even though there are two different franchises covered. I think the others are all one colour per franchise. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
MIG wrote:
Virgin is much into branding though. Not as much as FirstGroup, perhaps surprisingly. The relative lack of branding on the Voyagers (only on the outer ends) and Pendolinos (outer ends and frosted on the doors) is noticeable and pleasant compared with the F-in-circle appearing everywhere on anything to do with First. IMO, the way First overbrand makes them look shoddy and unprofessional. They'd do better to go lower-key. Neil |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4 Jul 2006 13:58:33 -0700 someone who may be "Neil Williams"
wrote this:- IMO, the way First overbrand makes them look shoddy and unprofessional. They'd do better to go lower-key. Indeed. In Scotland National Express were very low key, simply saying in a few places that the company was part of the National Express Group. Then Last came along and stuck their "F" on everything they can, as well as painting the trains pink. Given the state of some of their buses in Edinburgh I doubt if this approach has done the group any good. It has probably done the railways a little damage, though not much. -- David Hansen, Edinburgh I will *always* explain revoked encryption keys, unless RIP prevents me http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2000/00023--e.htm#54 |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message .com, at
13:58:33 on Tue, 4 Jul 2006, Neil Williams remarked: IMO, the way First overbrand makes them look shoddy and unprofessional. I took a party to York at the weekend, and they commented on how confusing it was to have five different (First-operated) Park-and-ride routes, all using identical looking buses. In other towns you have buses which are coloured to go along with the routes (Green, White, Red etc). The buses use different bus stops (for each colour), and they are not very easy to find; so being able to spot the relevant bus at a distance and "chase" it would be very useful. -- Roland Perry |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Roland Perry wrote: In message .com, at 13:58:33 on Tue, 4 Jul 2006, Neil Williams remarked: IMO, the way First overbrand makes them look shoddy and unprofessional. I took a party to York at the weekend, and they commented on how confusing it was to have five different (First-operated) Park-and-ride routes, all using identical looking buses. In other towns you have buses which are coloured to go along with the routes (Green, White, Red etc). The buses use different bus stops (for each colour), and they are not very easy to find; so being able to spot the relevant bus at a distance and "chase" it would be very useful. -- Roland Perry I wonder if that's a branding issue though? More likely they've got a bus garage with one fleet of buses in it which they put on the routes that they operate. It would be very restrictive to paint them according to a specific route, and very confusing when they inevitably had to use them on the wrong route. London famously always got by with one colour of bus (and each bus from a particular garage likely to turn up on any route operated by that garage). |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roland Perry wrote:
In message .com, at 13:58:33 on Tue, 4 Jul 2006, Neil Williams remarked: IMO, the way First overbrand makes them look shoddy and unprofessional. I took a party to York at the weekend, and they commented on how confusing it was to have five different (First-operated) Park-and-ride routes, all using identical looking buses. In other towns you have buses which are coloured to go along with the routes (Green, White, Red etc). The buses use different bus stops (for each colour), and they are not very easy to find; so being able to spot the relevant bus at a distance and "chase" it would be very useful. The Exeter ones are all yellow and blue.. - though each carries a largeish Sowton/Honiton Road/Matford name |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In uk.railway Roland Perry wrote:
: I took a party to York at the weekend, and they commented on how : confusing it was to have five different (First-operated) Park-and-ride : routes, all using identical looking buses. In other towns you have buses : which are coloured to go along with the routes (Green, White, Red etc). Most P&R schemes seem to be paid for by local authorities; York's is run without any real subsidy which is why the livery is so First-like. It would be almost impossible to keep 5 small fleets of different buses in service anyway, without lots of spare vehicles. The generic P&R livery gives some advertising advantage without confusing people if a non-P&R bus turns up. Geoff -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Given a choice, I would probably Geoff Short choose the life of a hobbit" - Mithrilian |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
An open letter regarding Croxley Rail link | London Transport | |||
Letter to London Buses | London Transport | |||
Southall CPZ - Open Letter | London Transport | |||
Ealing Council CPZ Scheme - Open Letter | London Transport |