Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message .com,
Mizter T writes I think Livingstone is just thinking aloud on this issue - which is fair enough, given that much of the Underground system wasn't built with the possibilities of sustained heatwaves in mind. Although average temperatures are now one degree higher than a century ago, there were several heatwaves in the Edwardian period - particularly 1911, which saw five months' of sustained high temperatures with a number of days exceeding 35C. But in those days much of the rolling stock was better designed for a through-flow of air, with relatively large "hopper" windows and, in a number of cases, open (but gated) platforms at the ends of carriages. I also suspect that staff were able to be much more pragmatic in dealing quickly with breakdowns. These days, H&S procedures often seem to endanger health and safety by causing long delays. As for all the reminders about carrying water (I was bombarded with them on the tube yesterday) - what next? Will nanny remind us to wrap up warm in cold weather and check that we have tied our shoelaces for fear that we might drip and fall down the gap? -- Paul Terry |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Terry writes:
I also suspect that staff were able to be much more pragmatic in dealing quickly with breakdowns. These days, H&S procedures often seem to endanger health and safety by causing long delays. I think that the HSE need reminding that the H is for 'health' and as it comes before 'safety' in their title should be a primary concern. Yet (at least the perception is that) they seem to concentrate almost entirely on safety. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Paul Terry
writes But in those days much of the rolling stock was better designed for a through-flow of air, with relatively large "hopper" windows and, in a number of cases, open (but gated) platforms at the ends of carriages. I may be mistaken but in January 1989 in Sydney I'm sure that the passenger doors were kept open - presumably for ventilation purposes - between stations on at least some of the older trains on the Cityrail system. This year the trains I travelled on there appeared to be newer and had air conditioning. -- congokid Eating out in London? Read my tips... http://congokid.com |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 5 Jul 2006 16:36:12 +0100 someone who may be congokid
wrote this:- I may be mistaken but in January 1989 in Sydney I'm sure that the passenger doors were kept open - presumably for ventilation purposes - between stations on at least some of the older trains on the Cityrail system. Some photographs of the old electric trains on Tyneside appear to show them moving with open sliding doors. I don't know if my eyes are deceiving me though. -- David Hansen, Edinburgh I will *always* explain revoked encryption keys, unless RIP prevents me http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2000/00023--e.htm#54 |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() David Hansen wrote: Some photographs of the old electric trains on Tyneside appear to show them moving with open sliding doors. I don't know if my eyes are deceiving me though. Yes, they did have manual sliding doors. When I lived in the North East, one particular colleague (now retired) recalled how, in those days, he would relieve himself in an open doorway while the train was moving! (Apparently it was common practice on late-night trains!) |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
congokid wrote:
I may be mistaken but in January 1989 in Sydney I'm sure that the passenger doors were kept open - presumably for ventilation purposes - between stations on at least some of the older trains on the Cityrail system. This year the trains I travelled on there appeared to be newer and had air conditioning. Open is the default setting on the Thai railways, at least on non-aircon stock... Neil |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 05 Jul 2006 16:36:12 +0100, congokid wrote:
In article , Paul Terry writes I may be mistaken but in January 1989 in Sydney I'm sure that the passenger doors were kept open - presumably for ventilation purposes Nope, the passengers were too lazy to close them. Around that time the last of the non power door carrages were withdrawn as people kept managing to fall out of moving trains and their relations kept going to the media about those 'unsafe trains'. between stations on at least some of the older trains on the Cityrail system. This year the trains I travelled on there appeared to be newer and had air conditioning. Nope. Probably only 2/3 of the fleet is actually air conditioned. All are power doors though. If it has opening windows it isn't air conditioned. There is no provision for opening the windows on Air conditioned stock. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article na.org.au,
Matthew Geier writes On Wed, 05 Jul 2006 16:36:12 +0100, congokid wrote: In article , Paul Terry writes I may be mistaken but in January 1989 in Sydney I'm sure that the passenger doors were kept open - presumably for ventilation purposes Nope, the passengers were too lazy to close them. I didn't realise it was up to passengers to close them. I probably expected them to be controlled by the driver, like on the London underground. Around that time the last of the non power door carrages were withdrawn as people kept managing to fall out of moving trains and their relations kept going to the media about those 'unsafe trains'. between stations on at least some of the older trains on the Cityrail system. This year the trains I travelled on there appeared to be newer and had air conditioning. Nope. Probably only 2/3 of the fleet is actually air conditioned. All are power doors though. If it has opening windows it isn't air conditioned. There is no provision for opening the windows on Air conditioned stock. I think I was on about three trains in total, so not at all a representative sample. Thanks for the clarification. -- congokid Eating out in London? Read my tips... http://congokid.com |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 07 Jul 2006 12:38:32 +0100, congokid wrote:
In article na.org.au, Matthew Geier writes between stations on at least some of the older trains on the Cityrail system. This year the trains I travelled on there appeared to be newer and had air conditioning. Nope. Probably only 2/3 of the fleet is actually air conditioned. All are power doors though. If it has opening windows it isn't air conditioned. There is no provision for opening the windows on Air conditioned stock. One thing I have noticed, and I could be imaging things (or just getting older :-), is that as the proportion of trains with air-conditioning has been increasing, the Sydney city tunnels are getting hotter. Presumably with each train dumping several kw extra of waste heat into the tunnels it's raising the average temperature. It's probably no so much an issue with the Sub-Surface lines with their larger tunnels and frequent 'smoke vents', but I could see this being a serious issue with the deep tube trains - if you fit air conditioning to any new build rolling stock, just where is the AC system going to dump it's waste heat ?. The tubes are already too hot. A serious amount of civil engineering would be needed to improve air-flows through the tubes to carry the waste heat off. (And probably electrical works to increase the capacity of the traction power network to take the extra electrical load of the air conditioning plant on each train). The tube tunnels themselves need some sort of cooling system fitted before even thinking about the trains. I seem to recall somewhere that pumping chilled water through pipes buried in the platform has been tried at at least one LU station. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 08 Jul 2006 09:42:34 +1000 someone who may be Matthew Geier
wrote this:- It's probably no so much an issue with the Sub-Surface lines with their larger tunnels and frequent 'smoke vents', but I could see this being a serious issue with the deep tube trains - if you fit air conditioning to any new build rolling stock, just where is the AC system going to dump it's waste heat ?. The tubes are already too hot. A serious amount of civil engineering would be needed to improve air-flows through the tubes to carry the waste heat off. (And probably electrical works to increase the capacity of the traction power network to take the extra electrical load of the air conditioning plant on each train). One of the reasons that rubber tyres have not replaced steel ones, as the proponents of the Paris Metro confidently predicted, is that the rubber wheels give off a lot of heat, which has to be dealt with in some way including beefing up ventilation and air-conditioning. -- David Hansen, Edinburgh I will *always* explain revoked encryption keys, unless RIP prevents me http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2000/00023--e.htm#54 |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Future Tube Map | London Transport | |||
Future Tube Map | London Transport | |||
Tube Lines Could Be Sponsored To Reduce Fares | London Transport | |||
Tube Plan To Axe 1,500 Jobs And Close All But 30 Ticket Offices | London Transport | |||
Plans to close Wembley Park tube ticket station | London Transport |