Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Adrian" wrote Ummm, lemme guess... No buffets on tube trains? Pullman cars Mayflower and Galatea ran on the Met between 1910 and 1939. Peter |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 4 Jul 2006 22:23:46 +0100, "Peter Masson"
wrote: "Adrian" wrote Ummm, lemme guess... No buffets on tube trains? Pullman cars Mayflower and Galatea ran on the Met between 1910 and 1939. Not quite tube trains in any sense. -- _______ +---------------------------------------------------+ |\\ //| | Charles Ellson: | | \\ // | +---------------------------------------------------+ | | | // \\ | Alba gu brath |//___\\| |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Charles Ellson ) gurgled happily, sounding much
like they were saying : Ummm, lemme guess... No buffets on tube trains? Pullman cars Mayflower and Galatea ran on the Met between 1910 and 1939. Not quite tube trains in any sense. The Met is certainly a tube line. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Adrian" wrote in message . 244.170... Charles Ellson ) gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying : Ummm, lemme guess... No buffets on tube trains? Pullman cars Mayflower and Galatea ran on the Met between 1910 and 1939. Not quite tube trains in any sense. The Met is certainly a tube line. It is not. It is entirely surface (or subsurface in some places), but never tube. That line is run entirely by A stock, which is surface stock, and would not fit in tube tunnels. Even if you consider the Metropolitan to include the Circle,H+C,ELL, it still isn't tube. Richard [in SG19] -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard M Willis ) gurgled happily,
sounding much like they were saying : Ummm, lemme guess... No buffets on tube trains? Pullman cars Mayflower and Galatea ran on the Met between 1910 and 1939. Not quite tube trains in any sense. The Met is certainly a tube line. It is not. It is entirely surface (or subsurface in some places), but never tube. That line is run entirely by A stock, which is surface stock, and would not fit in tube tunnels. Even if you consider the Metropolitan to include the Circle,H+C,ELL, it still isn't tube. sigh Tube in the sense of "London Underground", rather than tube in the sense of the actual engineering behind the line itself. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 05 Jul 2006 08:09:17 GMT, Adrian wrote:
Richard M Willis ) gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying : Ummm, lemme guess... No buffets on tube trains? Pullman cars Mayflower and Galatea ran on the Met between 1910 and 1939. Not quite tube trains in any sense. The Met is certainly a tube line. It is not. It is entirely surface (or subsurface in some places), but never tube. That line is run entirely by A stock, which is surface stock, and would not fit in tube tunnels. Even if you consider the Metropolitan to include the Circle,H+C,ELL, it still isn't tube. sigh Tube in the sense of "London Underground", rather than tube in the sense of the actual engineering behind the line itself. "Tube" in the sense of a buzz-word slavishly copied without bothering to recognise the correct meaning ? -- _______ +---------------------------------------------------+ |\\ //| | Charles Ellson: | | \\ // | +---------------------------------------------------+ | | | // \\ | Alba gu brath |//___\\| |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Charles Ellson ) gurgled happily, sounding
much like they were saying : The Met is certainly a tube line. It is not. It is entirely surface (or subsurface in some places), but never tube. That line is run entirely by A stock, which is surface stock, and would not fit in tube tunnels. Even if you consider the Metropolitan to include the Circle,H+C,ELL, it still isn't tube. sigh Tube in the sense of "London Underground", rather than tube in the sense of the actual engineering behind the line itself. "Tube" in the sense of a buzz-word slavishly copied without bothering to recognise the correct meaning ? Yes, that'll be it. Otherwise known as "in the sense that several million Londoners use it every day, rather than the sense that a handful of railway anoraks insist on it being used when they're feeling *really* pedantic and trying to score points..." |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 05 Jul 2006 07:19:57 GMT, Adrian wrote:
Ummm, lemme guess... No buffets on tube trains? Pullman cars Mayflower and Galatea ran on the Met between 1910 and 1939. Not quite tube trains in any sense. The Met is certainly a tube line. It's not a tube line, though it is a Tube line. ;-) |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
asdf wrote:
On 05 Jul 2006 07:19:57 GMT, Adrian wrote: Ummm, lemme guess... No buffets on tube trains? Pullman cars Mayflower and Galatea ran on the Met between 1910 and 1939. Not quite tube trains in any sense. The Met is certainly a tube line. It's not a tube line, though it is a Tube line. ;-) I find that distinction very useful when I'm trying to avoid misinterpretation. LU also always capitalise "Tube" when they're talking about themselves. -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Future Tube Map | London Transport | |||
Future Tube Map | London Transport | |||
Tube Lines Could Be Sponsored To Reduce Fares | London Transport | |||
Tube Plan To Axe 1,500 Jobs And Close All But 30 Ticket Offices | London Transport | |||
Plans to close Wembley Park tube ticket station | London Transport |