London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #5   Report Post  
Old July 13th 06, 03:45 PM posted to uk.transport.london
Kev Kev is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Nov 2005
Posts: 221
Default Higher congestion charge for thirsty cars


wrote:
John B wrote:
Greg Hennessy wrote:
Reported last night that Ken proposes to charge £25 a day for the most
polluting cars.


Thinly disguised class warfare to divert away from other more pressing
matters.


Voluntary progressive taxation is not the same as class warfare.

Is he now acknowledging the folly of extending the zone instead of
creating a separate zone for the western extension?

Unlikely.


Agreed.

If zone inhabitants pay 10%, the £2.50 a day charge might be a slight
incentive for them to use lighter vehicles.

Even more unlikely. Yummy mummies driving 'Chelsea tractors' in the zone,
are not going to be inconvenienced in the slightest.


True. However, the fact that they'll contribute an extra £650-ish each
a year to TfL coffers is no bad thing - it partially addresses the
outrageous anomaly that Council Tax stops at Band H...

--
John Band
john at johnband dot org
www.johnband.org

Although I do not normally subscribe to class-warfare type causes,
something our Deputy Prime Minister does adequately for all of us put
together, I do agree that Chelsea tractors ought to pay more for the
following reasons:

1. Their drivers are so often appallingly bad at driving, which results
in
(a) road-hogging
and (b) poor parking, both causing much inconvenience for others;
2. Their journey (e.g. 200 yards to take Annabelle to prep school) is
so often totally unnecessary
3. They do use more fuel and cause more pollution

But, I also agree that £600-odd will be unlikely to be much felt by
those who can afford to drive such monstrosities in the first place.

Marc.


It seems a bit hypocritical of mayor Ken to do this. If he is so anti
pollution why is he bringing the Olympics to London. Does anybody know
how much extra carbon the construction and the games will pump into the
atmosphere or is he working on the basis that whether the games went to
Paris or London the same amount of carbon is produced.

Kevin



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Prepare for higher rates canadianhomemortgages.com London Transport 0 June 12th 06 03:03 PM
Congestion Charge extension ITMA London Transport 3 April 29th 04 08:15 PM
Congestion Charge appeal question Sqwiggle London Transport 9 January 26th 04 09:47 PM
Congestion charge cheat Robin May London Transport 55 October 25th 03 09:54 AM
Extending the congestion charge zone Dave London Transport 13 July 29th 03 10:47 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:39 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017