Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I posted a few weeks ago about my pre-pay Oyster being unreliable
on the local buses. In fact I've barely used it since so I haven't pursued a replacement. Today I fronted up to a U3 to bring my shopping back from Uxbridge. After a good fraction of a second, the reader beeped and the LED changed from orange to green. Just as well, because at the stop outside RAF Uxbridge an inspector got on... He had a little hand-held scanner (I'd mistaken it for a mobile phone at first glance) which didn't want to scan my card, until he rotated it 180-degrees and then he finally grunted an OK. I've been wondering if advances in the usage of wireless technology since Oyster was originally specified -- especially mobile, bluetooth, and WiFi -- have led to higher interference rates than expected. PC, any comment? -- Ivan Reid, Electronic & Computer Engineering, ___ CMS Collaboration, Brunel University. ] Room 40-1-B12, CERN KotPT -- "for stupidity above and beyond the call of duty". |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 16 Jul 2006 19:14:24 +0000 (UTC), "Dr Ivan D. Reid"
wrote: I posted a few weeks ago about my pre-pay Oyster being unreliable on the local buses. In fact I've barely used it since so I haven't pursued a replacement. Today I fronted up to a U3 to bring my shopping back from Uxbridge. After a good fraction of a second, the reader beeped and the LED changed from orange to green. Just as well, because at the stop outside RAF Uxbridge an inspector got on... He had a little hand-held scanner (I'd mistaken it for a mobile phone at first glance) which didn't want to scan my card, until he rotated it 180-degrees and then he finally grunted an OK. I've been wondering if advances in the usage of wireless technology since Oyster was originally specified -- especially mobile, bluetooth, and WiFi -- have led to higher interference rates than expected. PC, any comment? No idea to be honest Ivan. The performance of card readers (both bus and on ticket gates) seems to vary enormously. There are times when my card shows as not being read while at others it beeps straight away. My card is in a ticket wallet stuffed with other things (not wireless in nature) and those extra millimetres seem to make a difference if a reader is not functioning correctly. If there is a problem I open out the wallet and place the card itself flat on the reader - that should ensure an accurate read. I do wonder just how frequently faults are reported or preventative maintenance is carried out on the on bus equipment in particular. I have not had to replace my card but I know others on group have had differing experiences. -- Paul C Admits to working for London Underground! |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dr Ivan D. Reid" typed
I posted a few weeks ago about my pre-pay Oyster being unreliable on the local buses. In fact I've barely used it since so I haven't pursued a replacement. Today I fronted up to a U3 to bring my shopping back from Uxbridge. After a good fraction of a second, the reader beeped and the LED changed from orange to green. Just as well, because at the stop outside RAF Uxbridge an inspector got on... He had a little hand-held scanner (I'd mistaken it for a mobile phone at first glance) which didn't want to scan my card, until he rotated it 180-degrees and then he finally grunted an OK. I've been wondering if advances in the usage of wireless technology since Oyster was originally specified -- especially mobile, bluetooth, and WiFi -- have led to higher interference rates than expected. PC, any comment? I had a mobile phone before I had an Oyster. My Oyster became unreliable after a while and was replaced. You are lucky in that I've never seen Uxbridge station ticket office unstaffed. I was traipsing to Burnt Oak (usually unstaffed) and Edgware (nobody in ticket office on a weekday at 3pm) to try and sort my Oyster replacement. Do not expect Oyster replacement to be quick and simple; just be pleasantly surprised if it is... -- Helen D. Vecht: Edgware. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 16 Jul 2006 21:16:56 +0100,
Helen Deborah Vecht wrote in : You are lucky in that I've never seen Uxbridge station ticket office unstaffed. I was traipsing to Burnt Oak (usually unstaffed) and Edgware (nobody in ticket office on a weekday at 3pm) to try and sort my Oyster replacement. It's often unstaffed, especially at weekends and late at night. Several times I've seen signs to board the train and pay at the destination (the gates are left open and the ticket machines out of use). Do not expect Oyster replacement to be quick and simple; just be pleasantly surprised if it is... -- Ivan Reid, Electronic & Computer Engineering, ___ CMS Collaboration, Brunel University. ] Room 40-1-B12, CERN KotPT -- "for stupidity above and beyond the call of duty". |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Oyster: still an unreliable rip-off | London Transport | |||
"Oyster Card barrier blunders cost passengers £60m a year" | London Transport | |||
Travel Card vs. Oyster Card | London Transport | |||
Oyster Card And Travel Card Question | London Transport | |||
Travel card month card cheaper than Oyster ? | London Transport |