Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I posted a few weeks ago about my pre-pay Oyster being unreliable
on the local buses. In fact I've barely used it since so I haven't pursued a replacement. Today I fronted up to a U3 to bring my shopping back from Uxbridge. After a good fraction of a second, the reader beeped and the LED changed from orange to green. Just as well, because at the stop outside RAF Uxbridge an inspector got on... He had a little hand-held scanner (I'd mistaken it for a mobile phone at first glance) which didn't want to scan my card, until he rotated it 180-degrees and then he finally grunted an OK. I've been wondering if advances in the usage of wireless technology since Oyster was originally specified -- especially mobile, bluetooth, and WiFi -- have led to higher interference rates than expected. PC, any comment? -- Ivan Reid, Electronic & Computer Engineering, ___ CMS Collaboration, Brunel University. ] Room 40-1-B12, CERN KotPT -- "for stupidity above and beyond the call of duty". |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Oyster: still an unreliable rip-off | London Transport | |||
"Oyster Card barrier blunders cost passengers £60m a year" | London Transport | |||
Travel Card vs. Oyster Card | London Transport | |||
Oyster Card And Travel Card Question | London Transport | |||
Travel card month card cheaper than Oyster ? | London Transport |