London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old August 11th 06, 08:39 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jan 2006
Posts: 942
Default reliability of NNL and district line richmond branch

Neil Williams wrote:
How reliable is the Richmond branch of the NNL and district line?


My limited experience of a week's use of the NLL (and observation of it
at Euston) suggested that reliability was a sick joke. A lot of it was
down to train failures; they'd do well to talk to Merseyrail to see how
they manage to avoid this being as much of an issue.


I've not been on Merseyrail in years, but I suspect that running
DC-only trains on a DC-only line presents fewer complications than
running 1970s AC/DC (let there be rock!) trains with regular
changeovers. Certainly, the 313s tend to break down at Drayton Park on
the FCC GN route far more than they do anywhere else along the line...

The NLL is a third-world disgrace to a capital city.


Wouldn't disagree, although arguably train length and frequency are
even more of a problem than reliability.

--
John Band
john at johnband dot org
www.johnband.org

  #2   Report Post  
Old August 11th 06, 09:09 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Nov 2005
Posts: 638
Default reliability of NNL and district line richmond branch

John B wrote:

I've not been on Merseyrail in years, but I suspect that running
DC-only trains on a DC-only line presents fewer complications than
running 1970s AC/DC (let there be rock!) trains with regular
changeovers. Certainly, the 313s tend to break down at Drayton Park on
the FCC GN route far more than they do anywhere else along the line...


Good point.

Would there, then, perhaps be some merit in doing a swap for some
diesel units that are running services under the wires in places like
Greater Manchester, one wonders, until reliability on changeover can be
increased?

Eurostars do the changeover daily at speed, so it isn't impossible with
10-year-old technology.

Neil

  #4   Report Post  
Old August 12th 06, 06:56 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Nov 2005
Posts: 638
Default reliability of NNL and district line richmond branch

Colin Rosenstiel wrote:

The 313s are 35 year old technology.


The units themselves are only about 30 years old though... (the 507s
and the 508s are the same age as me, 27).

They were also designed for a
maximum speed of 30MPH on DC (series only motors).


Really? Do they differ substantially from 507s and 508s? I always
assumed they were the same but with a 25kVAC-750VDC transformer on the
middle coach. The Merseyrail units are top speed 70mph, though I don't
know if they ever reach that, perhaps they do on the bit out to
Chester.

Neil

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Silverlink / District Line Richmond Ticket validity question Mystery Flyer London Transport 3 May 14th 07 10:50 PM
Worst line for reliability and best line for reliability? London Transport 6 March 15th 07 09:10 AM
reliability of NNL and district line richmond branch Colin Rosenstiel London Transport 5 August 12th 06 01:43 PM
reliability of NNL and district line richmond branch Colin Rosenstiel London Transport 0 August 12th 06 10:47 AM
Resignalling the Richmond branch? TheOneKEA London Transport 9 April 12th 06 12:23 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:20 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017