Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Solario wrote:
Dave Arquati wrote: Tom Anderson wrote: On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Dave Arquati wrote: Bob wrote: to turn round of half the trains at Paddington which seems a wasted opportunity - taking over the Hammersmith end of the H&C removes a busy junction on the Circle Line with knock on effects for that lines reliability would seem a low cost no brainer. I agree, but I think ensuring the central tunnel gets built is most important - adding on too many extra bits here and there could kill the whole project. Hammersmith could come later... Except Hammersmith involves noodling about quite near the Paddington portal (if you want to have a station at Royal Oak, or if you want to use the existing H&C fly-under, at any rate), so if you don't at least build in the possibility at the start, you might not be able to do it later. I'm not sure it would be worth keeping Royal Oak in this scenario (gasp). Its catchment area overlaps a lot with Bayswater, Warwick Avenue and Paddington H&C; a western entrance for Paddington Crossrail would also be close by. If CrossRail takes over the Hammersmith Branch, and I think there is a case for it, then there should be considerable rationalization of stations. It might be necessary, given the length of the trains (up to 245m). Westbourne Park should stay if Royal Oak were to go; Ladbroke Grove is an important station, and could be moved so that there were two entrances; one on Ladbroke Grove itself and the other on Portobello Road. A similar arrangement could see a long White City station replace both White City and Latimer Road; it could have a western entrance on Freston Road and an eastern one on Wood Lane (the platform would not be quite as long; it would not need to straddle the WLL & West Cross Route, but a pedestrian bridge could do so). Finally, a Shepherd's Bush station would be just the right length to run the length of the market between Uxbridge Road and Goldhawk Road with entrances at each. However, I'm not sure what impact this would have on the market itself. If it were too bad, then instead the arrangement might have to be to get rid of Goldhawk Road station altogether, extend Shepherd's Bush up towards Wood Lane for White City, ditch Latimer Road and have Ladbroke Grove run westwards with an entrance north of the sports centre. -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Green light for Woolwich Crossrail station | London Transport | |||
Is Woolwich really necessary - Crossrail | London Transport | |||
Crossrail Select Committee adds Woolwich station to scheme | London Transport News | |||
Canning Town - North Woolwich | London Transport | |||
DLR extension to woolwich | London Transport |