Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob wrote:
Dave Arquati wrote: What's wrong with Bayswater for the City? The Circle line has the same frequency as the H&C, and if Wimblewares were extended eastwards to compensate for the loss of the H&C, it would see a doubling of frequency. (The configuration I'm imagining is as now but with no H&C and with Wimblewares extended from Edgware Road to Whitechapel/Barking... call it the Wimblebark if you will!) Building on from the H&C Circle line tea cup ideas - how about two interposed reverse loops. How about existing H&C trains (to and) from Barking continuing from Edware Road via Bayswater and Victoria to rejoin the original route at Aldgate East - whilst Wimbleware continues to and from Liverpool Street, Aldgate and Victoria to join its original route at Earls Court. Nice idea, but I think you have too many trains on the Barking and Wimbledon arms, as well as the southern Circle. For example, you'd have 16tph between Gloucester Road and Tower Hill before you even added any Districts from Ealing / Richmond. I imagine you could eliminate all other Wimbledon services, leaving 16tph on the loop service (8tph via Paddington, 8tph via Victoria) -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Green light for Woolwich Crossrail station | London Transport | |||
Is Woolwich really necessary - Crossrail | London Transport | |||
Crossrail Select Committee adds Woolwich station to scheme | London Transport News | |||
Canning Town - North Woolwich | London Transport | |||
DLR extension to woolwich | London Transport |