Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mizter T" wrote in message
oups.com... Paul Weaver wrote: Kev wrote: How come Ken Livingstone, the great environmentalist is allowed to get away with dumping tons of CO2 into the atmosphere. Couldn't he have linked into this by video conferencing. That is what we are encouraged to do . Ken often delivers the opposite of what he preaches, hence massive congestion as he throws more and more buses into London, and they end up nose-to-tail for miles on end. I fundamentally disagree with that. The bus service has improved dramatically since his reforms, services are now far more reliable and frequent. What reforms? Piles and piles of cash have been thrown at TfL bus services thanks to chunky government grants (so they can persuade everyone the whole Mayoral/GLA thing is working) and debts run up by TfL themselves. Unless you're saying he's such a strong personality he can extract more money out of central Govt than anyone else? I suppose the Kengestion Charge has helped with additional funds for public transport, but I believe they are small in comparison to the overall spend. Anyone who has been given such a large amount of cash for spending on buses would've made them more reliable and frequent, I wager. For many people going by bus is now a good alternative to taking the car, not least as good bus services open up the rest of the public transport network to those not in the immediate proximity to a station. Maybe in some parts of the TfL network but I wouldn't agree with that in Bexley. The only time I use a bus is when I take my car in for servicing and have to get home and, although reliable and fairly frequent, they are in an absolutely appalling state; smelly, dirty, defaced, graffiti over the windows and other interior services. A really squalid form of transport thanks to rampant teenage vandalism that TfL quite clearly do not care too much about or they'd be doing a hell of a lot more about it. I am sick and tired of the operators bleating "we haven't got the money to add a conductor or replace the windows when they've been scratched" and then reveal profits of millions every year. Occasionally there are bus jams - but the increase in buses on the streets is IMO a very good thing - and it hasn't created "massive congestion". Road congestion existed beforehand, and is probably inevitable at certain pinch points. I would say, however, that I see loads of busses traversing Bexley at night that are in-service but completey empty (while chucking out loads of combusted diesel fumes). This is a complete waste - for such small numbers in the evenings it would probably be less polluting and cheaper to run a taxi service and actually take people to their door ;-) Ken deliveres on what he preaches far more than most other politicians. Quite possibly. He'll get my vote again next time. If he stands... Nick |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Crossrail could bankrupt London - says Ken Livingstone | London Transport | |||
KEN LIVINGSTONE: RACIST | London Transport | |||
A big Thank You to Ken Livingstone | London Transport | |||
Livingstone's latest wheeze | London Transport | |||
Independent article: Livingstone may run London rail network | London Transport |