Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Paul Weaver wrote: Mizter T wrote: I fundamentally disagree with that. The bus service has improved dramatically since his reforms Perhaps, it's must have been really bad before in that case. services are now far more reliable and I see half a dozen broken down buses a day. frequent. For many people going by bus is now a good alternative to taking the car, not least as good bus services open up the rest of the public transport network to those not in the immediate proximity to a station. I've caught a bus a few times from Ealing to Shepherds Bush when the central line has been on the blink. It took forever, almost faster to walk, and this was on a saturday! Occasionally there are bus jams - but the increase in buses on the If by "occasionally" you mean "permanently" from Marble Arch, along Oxford Circus, down to Piccadilly circus and trafalger square, then yes. Because buses are so large and opaque, it's hard to filter through on a bike, where filtering through stationary cars and taxis is easy. streets is IMO a very good thing - and it hasn't created "massive congestion". Road congestion existed beforehand, and is probably inevitable at certain pinch points. Buses go where the routes are, and they are the only traffic on oxford street, congestion is designed by the people who design the routes. The new killer buses (the massive 17m long ones that jut out in the centre, mount kerbs, and take forever making manouvers) are even worse, frequently blocking junctions causing even more traffic problems (one inconsiderate driver -- not hard to find -- can bring trafalger square to a halt for 2 minutes easilly) I think I have to agree with you on querying the improved reliability. I accept that according to very specific criteria, eg the number of buses arriving at their destination on time, reliability may have improved. But in terms of the overall likelihood of arriving where you want to go, and the level of comfort in doing it, I am not so sure. Much of the reliability has been achieved by cutting short the bus routes, often short of a popular destination, requiring more changes etc (and extra fares if on PAYG). Much of the rest of it has been achieved by making all bus stops into request stops. You certainly don't get where you want to go if you can't get on, or if you get whisked off beyond where you are going. As for bendy buses, what can I say? Monstrous, ludicrous vehicles, creating traffic chaos and a huge hazard to pedestrians, cyclists etc (I know some people on the group think all cyclists should be killed, and would think this was a good thing). I've tried to cross the roads in the Trafalgar Square and Whitehall area, and repeatedly found a pedestrian crossing on green, with a bendy bus parked across it, so that people have to walk around and sometimes find themselves trapped in the middle of the road when the traffic starts again. And how many times does a 29 park across the entire width of Whitehall when trying to get out of the side road they drive round? What insanity led to buses designed for wide open boulevards and airport terminals being crammed into the windy streets of London? On the other hand, night buses really are improved and are a major contribution to a "24-hour city". I never worry about lateness of getting home now. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Crossrail could bankrupt London - says Ken Livingstone | London Transport | |||
KEN LIVINGSTONE: RACIST | London Transport | |||
A big Thank You to Ken Livingstone | London Transport | |||
Livingstone's latest wheeze | London Transport | |||
Independent article: Livingstone may run London rail network | London Transport |