Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Iain wrote: "Orienteer" wrote in k: There used to be, but no longer! Central bus routes were 1 - 199, single deck routes 200-299, country buses north of the Thames 300-399, south 400-499, trolleybuses 500-699, Greenline routes 700 - 799. What about the W-prefixed buses? I've variously heard that the W stands for Walthamstow, Woodford, and even West (which seems unlikely seeing as they're mostly based around northeast London). Is there any official reason why (a) the W prefix was brought in, and (b) why they still use it? Iain I am sure that there hasn't been a W based on Woodford, at least for many decades. I think there were two versions of W relatively recently. Mainly it was routes around, and based at, Wood Green. There was one W route based in Walthamstow, which was the W21 circular route, but this was replaced by the 212 and various kinds of 97 around 1979ish I think. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Stratford paltform numbering | London Transport | |||
Bus Route Numbering | London Transport | |||
Bus route numbering | London Transport |