Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
John Rowland wrote: Dave Arquati wrote: Camden Town to Camden Road (an additional exit from the northern ends of the platforms at Camden Town to a second ticket office closer to Camden Road was floated as a potential congestion-relief measure). Floated by whom? When I phoned up the woman in charge of the public consultation for the rebuiding of Camden Town, she clearly regarded improving interchange with the NLL to be a bizarre and inexplicable aim. But of course. If it doesn't add to the property redevlopment "take" then there's no need for it in Camden Town. Nick |
#52
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Also, as a longer term idea, it strikes me that the idea some locals
have proposed for a Clapham Junction-South East London route could be a good addition to the network. A route that ran Clapham Junction-Peckham Rye-Lewisham-Woolwich-Abbey Wood would provide a link from Crossrail and City Airport to south London. Be even better if they built those extra platforms at Brockley. I've heard about the Clapham Junction to Sidcup idea, but this in my opinion seems mad. Clapham Junction to Plumstead service seems a far better idea, with an extension to Abbey Wood if the extra platforms could be built. Although I am not quite sure where the room to build the Crossrail platforms is coming from, let alone any additional platforms. If they ran the service to Plumstead/Abbey Wood throughout the course of the day/evening, they could scrap the little used Cannon Street - Lewisham - Plumstead trains and it would allow the Medway - Charing Cross semi-fast service to continue to travel via Greenwich instead of the IKF plan to go back to travelling via Lewisham. -- Keith Spink InfoTransport (http://www.infotransport.co.uk) Transport Images (http://www.transportimages.com) -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com Warning: Do not use Ultimate-Anonymity They are worthless spamers that are running a scam. |
#53
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 23:20:19 +0100, Thomas Covenant
wrote: South Tottenham - I think that has ramps I'm fairly sure it is steps only. Following this, I can confirm that at South Tottenham, it is steps up to the platforms. The ramp is from the main road to the bottom of the steps. |
#54
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 05 Sep 2006 16:20:05 +0100, Dave Arquati
wrote: Rather than opting for the brown "Rail" roundel, the branding scheme is an orange (!) "Overground" scheme - not to be confused with South London's "Overground Network" branding. http://i6.tinypic.com/47btbbq.jpg http://i8.tinypic.com/2dr9g5u.jpg http://i7.tinypic.com/402ntxj.jpg Charlie -- Remove NO-SPOO-PLEASE from my email address to reply Please send no unsolicited email or foodstuffs |
#55
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John B wrote:
Side note - a couple of interesting pics on the TfL press centre, including mock-ups of the London Overground Electrostars: http://www.tfl.gov.uk/tfl/press-cent...ry/gallery.asp Lots of nice glass waiting to be etched.. ![]() Jonathan |
#56
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Keith Spink wrote: Also, as a longer term idea, it strikes me that the idea some locals have proposed for a Clapham Junction-South East London route could be a good addition to the network. A route that ran Clapham Junction-Peckham Rye-Lewisham-Woolwich-Abbey Wood would provide a link from Crossrail and City Airport to south London. Be even better if they built those extra platforms at Brockley. I've heard about the Clapham Junction to Sidcup idea, but this in my opinion seems mad. Clapham Junction to Plumstead service seems a far better idea, with an extension to Abbey Wood if the extra platforms could be built. Although I am not quite sure where the room to build the Crossrail platforms is coming from, let alone any additional platforms. If they ran the service to Plumstead/Abbey Wood throughout the course of the day/evening, they could scrap the little used Cannon Street - Lewisham - Plumstead trains and it would allow the Medway - Charing Cross semi-fast service to continue to travel via Greenwich instead of the IKF plan to go back to travelling via Lewisham. Yeah, that was my thinking - it would, as much as such a performance polluting route can, simply the service pattern rather than complicate it, and hit quite a lot of interchanges. The platform thing could be an issue though. Jonn |
#57
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 5 Sep 2006 19:14:31 +0100, Andy wrote:
WATFORD RAIL USERS GROUP AN OPEN MEETING IS TO BE HELD ON MONDAY 11th SEPTEMBER 2006 7pm at WATFORD TOWN HALL, RICKMANSWORTH ROAD, WATFORD Entry to the Town Hall is via the Customers Service Centre entrance next to the Hempstead Road car park. Representatives from your local Train Operators will be in attendance. There will also be a presentation from Transport for London on their proposed plans to bring "BAKERLOO LINE TRAINS TO WATFORD JUNCTION" ALL WELCOME Did anyone go to this? If so, did anything new or interesting surface? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
London Overground from 11 Nov 2007 | London Transport | |||
London Overground - lack of engineering works information | London Transport | |||
New signs on London Overground | London Transport | |||
London Overground Ticketing - t&c's | London Transport | |||
London Overground Concession Award | London Transport |