Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 05:08:09 GMT, David of Broadway
wrote: On my two brief visits to London since Oyster was launched, I managed to thoroughly confuse the Oyster system several times. And, although I really shouldn't be looking over random strangers' shoulders while they use the ticket machines, I couldn't help but notice that many of their cards triggered the unresolved journey warning. I agree with Tristán that this is a problem. I think Oyster is an excellent system, which would have been very easy to use except for a few exceptions that let it down and make things more complicated, usually at the interface between different modes, and sometimes made worse by the physical layout of the stations. Pre-pay users seem to get the worst of it, especially with the £4 charge for not Doing the Right Thing - IMHO it's far too early to introduce this charge while there are so many special rules around. I'm talking mainly of National Rail stations, London Bridge and Wimbledon, where I think I paid 3 times for a tram journey (long story), and all the various validators around with special instructions - for instance the Entry Only at Bank onto the DLR, of course I touched it there anyway on the way out as like most people I didn't read the instructions but it was all OK in the end. Perhaps the system is more forgiving than I think? Also, I might be over-stating it: most people will be making "simple" Underground journeys where you can't go far wrong, from an Oyster point of view. Perhaps these special cases will go away with proper fare integration, leaving the system that it should have been all along. As usual, thanks to the politicians for that. I'm still a bit concerned about arrangements for stations that need to be evacuated. Will people still try to validate their cards on the way out? (A comparison with Couronnes might be stretching it a bit, but there's a potential problem, I think.) How is a £4 charge or unresolved journey cancelled, if the user rarely travels on the Underground? Richard. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Great points, and nice to see people agreeing with me for a change :-))
One quick question (on behalf of my wife, who has a 1-3 annual ticket on her Oyster, but with £20 on top for whenever she may go out of zone... What happens if she forgets to touch out at Plaistow (the gates are always open) under the new rules? Will she be charged £4 from her contingency pre-pay for not ending the journey? Or are people with season tickets not charged in this way? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
TfL 2007 fares now on the web | London Transport | |||
London Fares and Product Changes from 2nd January 2005 (LONG) | London Transport | |||
Interesting changes to NR Fares | London Transport | |||
Interesting changes to NR Fares | London Transport | |||
Interesting changes to NR Fares | London Transport |