"Richard J." wrote in message
.uk...
MaxB wrote:
"Peter Frimberley" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 18:56:32 +0100, "MaxB"
wrote:

I had planned to pop up to London to see the fireworks on the
Thames tonight, and just discovered the brilliant planning which
has shut down the
main line over the river and reduced my local service to hourly.

Well done Network Rail!

MaxB

They can't plan for every event. Whatever weekend they pick to do
the engineering work, there's always going to be some fairly large
gathering of people somewhere in the capital.

Having had to plan engineering works in the past, one of the first
things you do is to check what else is happening! And it's a damn
site easier these days with the internet.

And this wasn't just Thames festival day, it was also Open House
weekend plus some ITV event - not just your average weekend and
certainly not the day to close down the most conveniently situated
London terminal.

Well, it might be the most convenient for you, but it's useless for me.
Depends where you live, surely? Anyway, the tube was still running, so
there was no lack of transport connections across the river in central
London.

What's your local station that had it's service reduced to hourly
yesterday?
--
Richard J.
(to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address)




Elmstead Woods - and Charing Cross is still the best situated main line
station for central London, not terminating somewhere in the suburbs as so
many do!

MaxB




---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 0637-2, 15/09/2006
Tested on: 18/09/2006 10:13:09
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software.
http://www.avast.com

"MaxB" wrote:
Well, it might be the most convenient for you, but it's useless for me.
Depends where you live, surely? Anyway, the tube was still running, so
there was no lack of transport connections across the river in central
London.

What's your local station that had it's service reduced to hourly
yesterday?

Elmstead Woods - and Charing Cross is still the best situated main line
station for central London, not terminating somewhere in the suburbs as so
many do!

Terminating somewhere in the suburbs? Sorry, but you're talking ****e.
Granted, Charing Cross is the closest mainline terminus to Central London,
being pretty much smack bang in the middle of the West End and all that, but
the other terminii are hardly out in the suburbs.

They're all within around 10 minutes of somewhere right in the centre -
Kings Cross, Euston, Marylebone, Paddington, Victoria, Waterloo,
Blackfriars, Cannon Street, Fenchurch Street, Liverpool Street and Moorgate
all fit that description. Paddington and Marylebone are vaguely far out
compared to the rest, but still nothing close to anything matching the
description of "somewhere in the suburbs".

And yes, for a night out in the West End, Charing Cross is the best placed
mainline station, but that's only any good if you live the South-East of the
centre (i.e. on a line that goes in to Charing Cross). For people coming in
from the West, East, North, North-West, South and South-West, train to
another London Terminus and then the tube is a much better bet. Well, with
the possible exception of the South, where a change at London Bridge will
get you straight to Charing Cross.

I can't see what you're moaning about though - surely you could have just
changed at London Bridge for Blackfriars and got you just as close as
Charing Cross would have done?

--
"For want of the price of tea and a slice, the old man died."

On Sat, 23 Sep 2006 17:25:05 GMT, AstraVanMan wrote:

I can't see what you're moaning about though - surely you could have just
changed at London Bridge for Blackfriars and got you just as close as
Charing Cross would have done?

Charing Cross trains were being diverted to Cannon Street. Cannon
Street Tube station was kept open all weekend, and tickets to London
Terminals were being accepted on the Tube between Cannon Street and
Embankment. For a one-off leisure journey, the inconvenience seems
minor to say the least. Compared to what people usually have to put up
with when their desired route is closed for engineering works, it
barely seems worth a mention.

Having the service to your local station reduced to hourly is, I
admit, far more of an inconvenience.

"asdf" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 23 Sep 2006 17:25:05 GMT, AstraVanMan wrote:

I can't see what you're moaning about though - surely you could have just
changed at London Bridge for Blackfriars and got you just as close as
Charing Cross would have done?

Charing Cross trains were being diverted to Cannon Street. Cannon
Street Tube station was kept open all weekend, and tickets to London
Terminals were being accepted on the Tube between Cannon Street and
Embankment. For a one-off leisure journey, the inconvenience seems
minor to say the least. Compared to what people usually have to put up
with when their desired route is closed for engineering works, it
barely seems worth a mention.

Having the service to your local station reduced to hourly is, I
admit, far more of an inconvenience.

Having read all the comments on my original posting, I will just say I
sincerely hope none of you are in charge of arranging engineering works!
This was a stupidly timed closure and none of the Network Rail apologists
for it have convinced me otherwise.

MaxB




---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 0638-1, 22/09/2006
Tested on: 23/09/2006 22:57:09
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software.
http://www.avast.com

On Sat, 23 Sep 2006 22:57:01 +0100, "MaxB"
wrote:

"asdf" wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 23 Sep 2006 17:25:05 GMT, AstraVanMan wrote:

I can't see what you're moaning about though - surely you could have just
changed at London Bridge for Blackfriars and got you just as close as
Charing Cross would have done?

Charing Cross trains were being diverted to Cannon Street. Cannon
Street Tube station was kept open all weekend, and tickets to London
Terminals were being accepted on the Tube between Cannon Street and
Embankment. For a one-off leisure journey, the inconvenience seems
minor to say the least. Compared to what people usually have to put up
with when their desired route is closed for engineering works, it
barely seems worth a mention.

Having the service to your local station reduced to hourly is, I
admit, far more of an inconvenience.

Having read all the comments on my original posting, I will just say I
sincerely hope none of you are in charge of arranging engineering works!
This was a stupidly timed closure and none of the Network Rail apologists
for it have convinced me otherwise.

It's impossible for them toarrange a closure that affects nobody.

The people it affects will always think it is stupidly timed.

--
James Farrar
. @gmail.com

James Farrar wrote:
On Sat, 23 Sep 2006 22:57:01 +0100, "MaxB"
wrote:

"asdf" wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 23 Sep 2006 17:25:05 GMT, AstraVanMan wrote:

I can't see what you're moaning about though - surely you could have just
changed at London Bridge for Blackfriars and got you just as close as
Charing Cross would have done?

Charing Cross trains were being diverted to Cannon Street. Cannon
Street Tube station was kept open all weekend, and tickets to London
Terminals were being accepted on the Tube between Cannon Street and
Embankment. For a one-off leisure journey, the inconvenience seems
minor to say the least. Compared to what people usually have to put up
with when their desired route is closed for engineering works, it
barely seems worth a mention.

Having the service to your local station reduced to hourly is, I
admit, far more of an inconvenience.

Having read all the comments on my original posting, I will just say I
sincerely hope none of you are in charge of arranging engineering works!
This was a stupidly timed closure and none of the Network Rail apologists
for it have convinced me otherwise.

It's impossible for them toarrange a closure that affects nobody.

The people it affects will always think it is stupidly timed.



And given some of the appallingly timed engineering works that have
taken place over the years, I don't really understand the reason for
picking out this one. It would have been badly timed if closures
prevented people from reaching the Thames Festival, but this particular
closure hardly affected access to the Festival at all.