Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 00:57:38 +0100, Tim Roll-Pickering
wrote: Mizter T wrote: I can't recall all the details about the messy extended closure of the line in the 90's, Wasn't it a combination of upgrading the tunnel under the Thames, combined with building Canada Water? Well it was primarily to deal with the tunnel, but during that time various parties involved got into a number of arguments about the best way to deal with it, I can't now remember precisely who it was, but we all (ie us users and interested observers) came to the conclusion that Brunel obviously knew a great deal more about tunneling than they did. Canada Water came later, or was opened to the public some time after the line reopened. The replacement bus service was comprised of the now no longer seen Hoppers with their very bouncy suspension, and those of us who had previously used NXG had to make our own way to Surrey Quays to get one. Still I am hopeful that now we have TfL it may work out somewhat better. -- Martin Smith |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Broad Street station | London Transport | |||
Access to the Broad Street route | London Transport | |||
Waterloo Int future uses | London Transport | |||
Question about Broad Street | London Transport | |||
Question about Broad Street | London Transport |