Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 17:40:28 +0100, "Tim Roll-Pickering"
wrote: wrote: A bit of advance warning for those who haven't heard - from November, if you use pre-pay Oyster, and you fail to touch in or out at any point of your travels where you're supposed to do so, you will find yourself being charged £4.00 for the incomplete journey. All the signs up say this came in on October 10th. consults briefing material The date of introduction is Sunday 19th November 2006. -- Paul C Admits to working for London Underground! |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Corfield wrote:
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 17:40:28 +0100, "Tim Roll-Pickering" wrote: wrote: A bit of advance warning for those who haven't heard - from November, if you use pre-pay Oyster, and you fail to touch in or out at any point of your travels where you're supposed to do so, you will find yourself being charged £4.00 for the incomplete journey. All the signs up say this came in on October 10th. consults briefing material The date of introduction is Sunday 19th November 2006. Is it going to be a _requirement_ for holders of Travelcard seasons loaded on Oyster who are only travelling within their zones (i.e. the zonal validity of their Travelcard)? Logic would suggest they don't need to, but ticket office staff have in the past advised me to always touch-in and out whether using PAYG or a Travelcard , so I wonder if it will be made a rule just for the sake of clarity (though for the inconvenience of knowledgeable passengers). Sorry if I haven't been paying attention at the back if this has been discussed before! |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
For stations are currently being "trialed"
"Mizter T" wrote in message ups.com... Tim Roll-Pickering wrote: wrote: A bit of advance warning for those who haven't heard - from November, if you use pre-pay Oyster, and you fail to touch in or out at any point of your travels where you're supposed to do so, you will find yourself being charged £4.00 for the incomplete journey. All the signs up say this came in on October 10th. I also saw one of these posters today - I took particular note of it given the previous discussions here on utl had suggested this change wasn't coming until November. I'll try and take a snap of one of the posters tomorrow and post a link here. |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 17 Oct 2006 13:32:00 -0700, "Mizter T" wrote:
Paul Corfield wrote: On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 17:40:28 +0100, "Tim Roll-Pickering" wrote: wrote: A bit of advance warning for those who haven't heard - from November, if you use pre-pay Oyster, and you fail to touch in or out at any point of your travels where you're supposed to do so, you will find yourself being charged £4.00 for the incomplete journey. All the signs up say this came in on October 10th. consults briefing material The date of introduction is Sunday 19th November 2006. Is it going to be a _requirement_ for holders of Travelcard seasons loaded on Oyster who are only travelling within their zones (i.e. the zonal validity of their Travelcard)? Logic would suggest they don't need to, but ticket office staff have in the past advised me to always touch-in and out whether using PAYG or a Travelcard , so I wonder if it will be made a rule just for the sake of clarity (though for the inconvenience of knowledgeable passengers). There is nothing I have read that says that travelcard holders travelling within their zonal validity must touch in and out. The obvious reason for this is that there is no requirement on such journeys to activate a claim against the pre-pay purse on the card. However I think you are correct in saying that the message is being kept as simple as possible - all Oyster card holders touch in and out on every trip. If everyone does this then there should be no issues with respect to Pre-Pay or Capping or auto extension using a combination of zonal validity on the Oyster card and the pre-pay value. If people tried to construct a poster message, a sign or a PA script that dealt with all the ins and outs I imagine we would have passengers throwing themselves lemming like off platforms as they struggled to unravel the complexity of what works and what does not. I imagine this change is going to be controversial. Given recent issues about collection of tickets via gates when people don't wish to actually travel on the tube I think that issue is going to become even more heated. In principle the idea is great and seamless *if* you travel on the tube. Where people have different travel patterns then a different, more flexible solution is required. -- Paul C Admits to working for London Underground! |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 21:44:24 +0100, Paul Corfield
wrote: On 17 Oct 2006 13:32:00 -0700, "Mizter T" wrote: Paul Corfield wrote: On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 17:40:28 +0100, "Tim Roll-Pickering" wrote: wrote: A bit of advance warning for those who haven't heard - from November, if you use pre-pay Oyster, and you fail to touch in or out at any point There is nothing I have read that says that travelcard holders travelling within their zonal validity must touch in and out. The obvious reason for this is that there is no requirement on such journeys to activate a claim against the pre-pay purse on the card. Until all National Rail stations within the TfL area have gates or validators, it will always be necessary to allow incomplete journeys within the validity of a travelcard. However I think you are correct in saying that the message is being kept as simple as possible - all Oyster card holders touch in and out on every trip. If everyone does this then there should be no issues with respect to Pre-Pay or Capping or auto extension using a combination of zonal validity on the Oyster card and the pre-pay value. If people tried to construct a poster message, a sign or a PA script that dealt with all the ins and outs I imagine we would have passengers throwing themselves lemming like off platforms as they struggled to unravel the complexity of what works and what does not. The simplest would be: "If you are using PAYG for any part of your journey, you must touch in and touch out. If you are using PAYG for any part of your journey and a paper ticket from National Rail, you must touch any validators at the interchange point." I imagine this change is going to be controversial. Given recent issues about collection of tickets via gates when people don't wish to actually travel on the tube I think that issue is going to become even more heated. In principle the idea is great and seamless *if* you travel on the tube. Where people have different travel patterns then a different, more flexible solution is required. |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Corfield wrote:
On 17 Oct 2006 13:32:00 -0700, "Mizter T" wrote: Paul Corfield wrote: On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 17:40:28 +0100, "Tim Roll-Pickering" wrote: wrote: A bit of advance warning for those who haven't heard - from November, if you use pre-pay Oyster, and you fail to touch in or out at any point of your travels where you're supposed to do so, you will find yourself being charged £4.00 for the incomplete journey. All the signs up say this came in on October 10th. consults briefing material The date of introduction is Sunday 19th November 2006. Is it going to be a _requirement_ for holders of Travelcard seasons loaded on Oyster who are only travelling within their zones (i.e. the zonal validity of their Travelcard)? Logic would suggest they don't need to, but ticket office staff have in the past advised me to always touch-in and out whether using PAYG or a Travelcard , so I wonder if it will be made a rule just for the sake of clarity (though for the inconvenience of knowledgeable passengers). There is nothing I have read that says that travelcard holders travelling within their zonal validity must touch in and out. The obvious reason for this is that there is no requirement on such journeys to activate a claim against the pre-pay purse on the card. However I think you are correct in saying that the message is being kept as simple as possible - all Oyster card holders touch in and out on every trip. If everyone does this then there should be no issues with respect to Pre-Pay or Capping or auto extension using a combination of zonal validity on the Oyster card and the pre-pay value. If people tried to construct a poster message, a sign or a PA script that dealt with all the ins and outs I imagine we would have passengers throwing themselves lemming like off platforms as they struggled to unravel the complexity of what works and what does not. Thanks for the prompt reply Paul and for clearing that up - it's what I had guessed, but not what the Oyster _always_ touch-in/touch-out publicity states. However, as you rightly say, the message should be kept as simple as possible. Explaining that Travelcard holders don't need to touch-in unless they're going out of their zonal validity when in fact they should touch-in is not a simple message to convey - always touch in/out however is crystal clear. Nonetheless there is one new poster I've seen that must confuse the hell out of people - I took a note of what it said on my mobile to share with fellow utl-ers: ~~~~~ To pay the correct fare, touch your Oyster card flat on the yellow reader. You must do this at the start and end of your Tube, DLR and some NR journeys. And at the start of your bus or tram journey. Failure to do so may result in a penalty fare or prosecution. [Small print at bottom of poster] NR only allow Oyster customers to use PAYG on some journeys. Ask your train operator for details. ~~~~~ It's the "must" touch-in/out at the start/end of "some NR journeys" bit that caught my eye - obviously the NR journeys in question are on routes where PAYG is accepted (and no harm will arise for those who have Travelcards on Oyster if they touch-in on any reader - even if they don't have to - as long as they're "in zone"), but I'm sure it's clear as mud to most people. Being told you "must" do something "sometimes" without specifying the conditions of that "sometimes" is less than ideal. This relates to a thread of about a week ago where I argued the case _against_ a TOC-by-TOC acceptance of Oyster PAYG because IMO most people would find it very confusing - I think there's a strong argument _for_ the whole NR network in London to go live at the same time (obviously apart from the bits that already accept PAYG, which is mostly in order to honour interavailability) as it would provide clarity. I imagine this change is going to be controversial. Given recent issues about collection of tickets via gates when people don't wish to actually travel on the tube I think that issue is going to become even more heated. In principle the idea is great and seamless *if* you travel on the tube. Where people have different travel patterns then a different, more flexible solution is required. If I was front-line LU staff member I wouldn't be looking forward to the next few months. I can already see the frustrated faces of passengers who think that TfL has stolen money from their Oyster, and the frustrated faces of LU staff trying to explain why this has happened to them. And I suspect this ng will be piled high with complaints too :-( |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Colin Rosenstiel wrote:
In article . com, (Mizter T) wrote: Nor (again AFAIA) will it cause any problems if you touch-in a second time, say if you weren't sure if you're first attempt was successful. The problem is when you touch in when you should have been using a paper ticket for the particular journey. There appears to be no way to undo that mistake at the time. It's easily done if you have to use a combination of tickets. I'm not quite sure what you've done but I've certainly touched-in with an Oyster when I should've used the paper Day Travelcard I'd bought for that days travels. Probably did that a couple of times but I've learnt my lesson now - I put my Oyster out of harms way deep in my wallet, which counter-acts my absent mindedness when I come across an automatic barrier that wants a ticket - the only ticket to hand is the right ticket!. By the by, I didn't 'undo' those mistakes, they just continued to be displayed as unresolved journeys for x number of months afterwards. Of course such a mistake will cost one a lot more now - which is exactly your point. My point, I guess, is just don't make those kind of mistakes. |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
BBC discovers that Oyster users can be overcharged for incomplete journeys | London Transport | |||
BBC discovers that Oyster users can be overcharged for incomplete journeys | London Transport | |||
Oyster incomplete journeys - further info | London Transport | |||
No cap applied to Oyster prepay with incomplete journeys? | London Transport | |||
No cap applied to Oyster prepay with incomplete journeys? | London Transport |