Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#71
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#72
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#74
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#75
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#76
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Oter wrote:
wrote: Well today the posters went up all over the place about the changes coming to how incomplete journeys are charged on pre-pay Oyster cards, and most staff should by now have had some training on what's happening. The whole thing starts from 19th November 2006 (apart from the few stations who've had it already for a couple weeks, as a test) and will affect anyone using pre-pay Oyster who doesn't touch in or out correctly. Basically for any journey that is not validated at start AND finish (by touching on the yellow readers) you will be charged £4 (which is the maximum cash price for a 1-6 single). I have yet another prepay question, about the procedure for touching out: Some stations (e.g. New Cross) have Oyster touchpads on the platforms and no ticket gates or touchpads in the ticket hall. Other stations (e.g. Farringdon) have Oyster validators on the platforms as well as ticket gates with touchpads in the ticket hall. When I arrive at an unfamiliar destination station by tube (having touched in at the start of my journey) and spot Oyster touchpads on the platform, is there anyway of telling whether I am expected to touch out there? Or am I expected to walk upstairs, discover that there aren't any ticket gates, and then return to the platform to touch out? I would say that in general, platform validators are for interchange only - unless you can actually see an exit with no gates. Therefore at places like New Cross and Olympia, when you arrive at the platform validator you can see that there is no Oyster reader at the exit. Elsewhere, there are either gates or validators provided at the station exit for those leaving (e.g. Farringdon, Highbury & Islington, King's Cross Thameslink). I'm not sure whether this holds true across the system. I think there is a distinct lack of useful signing next to Oyster validators (just a simple instruction would be enough - "touch here only if changing to or from National Rail services" or "Underground users, touch here if entering or leaving the station". Paddington H&C is a particularly idiotic example. There is a validator on the platform for those interchanging to/from FGW local services on particular platforms - but if you are interchanging to services on any of the other platforms, you need to pass through the proper gate line on the footbridge instead. There is no information next to the platform validators to show that this is the case, and you can't see the ticket gates from the platforms. IMHO, it would have made more sense to put a validator on the footbridge so you could see that it was an either/or situation. If I took the tube to Farringdon and touched out on the platform and again at the ticket gates, would I have a problem? Not entirely sure. I would guess no - so long as you used the pads on the proper gates and not the validator at the side gate (along the lines of Wimbledon). Someone else might know... -- Dave Arquati www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London |
#77
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 12:50 +0000 (GMT Standard Time),
(Colin Rosenstiel) wrote: Oh dear! You'll be telling us that London is divided into 0207 and 0208 next! Of course not - it's divided into 0207, 0208 and 0203 these days. :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) (Is 5 smileys enough to show that I don't mean it?) -- Philip [Don't top post. Quote selectively. Don't use HTML. Enjoy Usenet] |
#78
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Philip K
writes On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 12:50 +0000 (GMT Standard Time), (Colin Rosenstiel) wrote: Oh dear! You'll be telling us that London is divided into 0207 and 0208 next! Of course not - it's divided into 0207, 0208 and 0203 these days. :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) (Is 5 smileys enough to show that I don't mean it?) Don't laugh. The newsletter we official guides get actually had an article some months ago saying that London was about to get a new "extra" code in the form of 0203. I could have screamed. (Although everyone I've moaned to about it can't see my point of view and genuinely believes it to be simply a new extra code.) -- Ian Jelf, MITG Birmingham, UK Registered Blue Badge Tourist Guide for London and the Heart of England http://www.bluebadge.demon.co.uk |
#79
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 22:19:32 +0000, Ian Jelf
wrote: In message , Philip K writes On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 12:50 +0000 (GMT Standard Time), (Colin Rosenstiel) wrote: Oh dear! You'll be telling us that London is divided into 0207 and 0208 next! Of course not - it's divided into 0207, 0208 and 0203 these days. :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) (Is 5 smileys enough to show that I don't mean it?) Don't laugh. The newsletter we official guides get actually had an article some months ago saying that London was about to get a new "extra" code in the form of 0203. So did the Evening Standard, FFS! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Oyster Card Users - info on incomplete journeys | London Transport | |||
Oyster pre-pay penalty for incomplete journeys at NR terminals | London Transport | |||
No cap applied to Oyster prepay with incomplete journeys? | London Transport | |||
No cap applied to Oyster prepay with incomplete journeys? | London Transport | |||
No cap applied to Oyster prepay with incomplete journeys? | London Transport |