Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
If an LU train fails between stations and comes to a stand do following
trains successively apply the "stop and proceed" rule leading to an enormous queue of trains with minimal distance between each one? Does the train immediately behind the failed train shunt the failed train to the next station and subsequently to the depot? Is it feasible that the train behind the failure could be incompatible with the failed train in which case what happens then? -- gordon |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ups.com... If an LU train fails between stations and comes to a stand do following trains successively apply the "stop and proceed" rule leading to an enormous queue of trains with minimal distance between each one? Does the train immediately behind the failed train shunt the failed train to the next station and subsequently to the depot? Is it feasible that the train behind the failure could be incompatible with the failed train in which case what happens then? -- gordon If memory serves me correct: A 6 car LU train actually has 3 or 4 motor cars, and at least 3 conductors, and a similar number of redundant pneumatic braking systems. So given that the most likely cause of failure would be 1 out of 3 or 4 parts of the system, I understand a driver can simply toggle off a failed motor or compressor, and hence limp back to a depot. I was once on a District line train where the motor in the second last car (in front of me) caught fire bellowing out toxic black smoke. I decided to wait until we got to the station before pressing the alarm. (I didn't fancy being stranded between stations with smoke heading my way.) The driver simply turned off the burnt out motor by opening a service hatch and turning a lever, and then drove back to the depot. I would think the most likely scenario to jam up the tube would be "signal failure", power grid problems (given our third world approach to power continuity), or broken track. I would think a driver would know by feel and by gauges if there were compressor / brake pressure leakages or voltage problems and go out of service as soon as he suspected the merest problem. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ahh yes Steve, Fitters who know "everything about their stock" they
ALWAYS know how to get the train moving! As a last resort, the following train could be used to 'push out' the failed train but that is very unlikely to happen as a fitter will be brought down from a depot to deal with it where it is. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
And if that don't work hit it with an hammer......
"www.waspies.net" wrote in message ... Ahh yes Steve, Fitters who know "everything about their stock" they ALWAYS know how to get the train moving! As a last resort, the following train could be used to 'push out' the failed train but that is very unlikely to happen as a fitter will be brought down from a depot to deal with it where it is. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Heracles Pollux wrote: I was once on a District line train where the motor in the second last car (in front of me) caught fire bellowing out toxic black smoke. I decided to wait until we got to the station before pressing the alarm. (I didn't fancy being stranded between stations with smoke heading my way.) I thought it was policy to always continue to the next station ("where help can be more easily given") if the alarm cord was pulled. Patrick |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Failed Oyster card | London Transport | |||
Failed Oyster auto top-up - why? | London Transport | |||
Poor management failed Tube firm Metronet | London Transport | |||
Your Auto top-up payment has failed | London Transport | |||
Plan for dealing with obnoxious phone calls on trains? | London Transport |