Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Boltar wrote: Anyone know why the Southeastern DC only class 465s sometimes continue on to City Thameslink in the rush hour but not all the way to Farringdon? SET continues to run a handful of trains to City to meet legal obligations of service replacement after closure of Holborn Viaduct. Thats the only reason they run trains there at all. 465s are not and never have been cleared to Farringdon. There is almost certainly a signals and telecomms interference issue with LUL lines that is probably too expensive to resolve for the gain. The only reason useful period to run such trains through for connections would be in the peaks - and turning back trains in Farringdon would gobble up too much (of the present day) capcity that is better used by through trains. (Of course ... 365s might have fitted the bill ... ) In answer to another comment, DC *have* run to Farringdon - with 455s. In the very early days of the through route, 455s had to early morning workings to Farringdon and back - one was a Sanderstead train, the other was also from a plce being with S but I can't recall with one. I've done one of those 455 moves myself - so I know it took place. -- Nick |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
465s finally get CCTV (and new displays) | London Transport | |||
Thameslink Train Kentish Town to Farringdon | London Transport | |||
Serious arcing at Farringdon | London Transport | |||
Farringdon Tickets | London Transport | |||
Eighteen LU trains damaged at Farringdon... | London Transport |