C wrote:
"THC" wrote in message
oups.com...
C wrote:
I take it thats a mainline train station - North London line.

It was. The clue is given in the URL for the link - "disused
stations". Wake up at the back.

THC


Yeah but its not a tube station.

You didn't say you were only interested in tube stations. This group
covers all transport in London.

Quietest tube station: according to the latest official figures (for
2005), Heathrow Terminal 4.
http://www.tfl.gov.uk/tube/company/p...18&agekey=2005

--
Richard J.
(to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address)

"Richard J." wrote in message
. uk...
C wrote:
"THC" wrote in message
oups.com...
C wrote:
I take it thats a mainline train station - North London line.

It was. The clue is given in the URL for the link - "disused
stations". Wake up at the back.

THC


Yeah but its not a tube station.

You didn't say you were only interested in tube stations. This group
covers all transport in London.

Quietest tube station: according to the latest official figures (for
2005), Heathrow Terminal 4.
http://www.tfl.gov.uk/tube/company/p...18&agekey=2005

--
Richard J.
(to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address)


Sorry I should of made it clear.

On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 12:07:21 GMT, "C"
wrote:


"Richard J." wrote in message
.uk...
C wrote:
"THC" wrote in message
oups.com...
C wrote:
I take it thats a mainline train station - North London line.

It was. The clue is given in the URL for the link - "disused
stations". Wake up at the back.

THC


Yeah but its not a tube station.

You didn't say you were only interested in tube stations. This group
covers all transport in London.

Quietest tube station: according to the latest official figures (for
2005), Heathrow Terminal 4.
http://www.tfl.gov.uk/tube/company/p...18&agekey=2005

Ha! Yes, i can see that

Sorry I should of made it clear.

No, you should *have* made it clear.

C wrote in message
:

Sorry I should of made it clear.

And you should *have* said "should have", not "should of" ;-)


I'm surprised that Heathrow T4 is the quietest Underground station. Given
the volume of people who travel to/from Heathrow, I wonder if a lot of them
are using Heathrow Express, either all the way to Paddington or else between
T4 and T123 where they change to Picadilly line.

Presumably the quietest Underground station in all senses of the word
"quietest" is Alwdych: not only is it disused but (unlike Museum, Down
Street, Marlborough Road etc) it is also on a closed line so it doesn't even
have any trains passing through it.

Martin Underwood wrote:
C wrote in message
:

Sorry I should of made it clear.

And you should *have* said "should have", not "should of" ;-)


I'm surprised that Heathrow T4 is the quietest Underground station.

Read my post again. It *was* the quietest station in 2005.

Remember this? ....
http://www.tuberelief.co.uk/images/heathrow.jpg

--
Richard J.
(to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address)

Richard J. wrote in message
:

Martin Underwood wrote:
C wrote in message
:

Sorry I should of made it clear.

And you should *have* said "should have", not "should of" ;-)


I'm surprised that Heathrow T4 is the quietest Underground station.

Read my post again. It *was* the quietest station in 2005.

Remember this? ....
http://www.tuberelief.co.uk/images/heathrow.jpg

Ah. Sorry. Your posting just referred to "latest official figures (for
2005)", without drawing attention to 2005 being a special year for T4
station. Now I understand ;-)


PS: I've corrected "quiestest" to "quietest" in the thread title - can't
believe I didn't spot that till now!

"Martin Underwood" a@b wrote in message
...
Richard J. wrote in message
:

Martin Underwood wrote:
C wrote in message
:

Sorry I should of made it clear.

And you should *have* said "should have", not "should of" ;-)


I'm surprised that Heathrow T4 is the quietest Underground station.

Read my post again. It *was* the quietest station in 2005.

Remember this? ....
http://www.tuberelief.co.uk/images/heathrow.jpg

Ah. Sorry. Your posting just referred to "latest official figures (for
2005)", without drawing attention to 2005 being a special year for T4
station. Now I understand ;-)


PS: I've corrected "quiestest" to "quietest" in the thread title - can't
believe I didn't spot that till now!


So Heathrow Terminal 4 gets less passengers than Rodney Valley?

C wrote:
"Martin Underwood" a@b wrote in message
...
Richard J. wrote in message
:

Martin Underwood wrote:
C wrote in message
:

Sorry I should of made it clear.

And you should *have* said "should have", not "should of" ;-)


I'm surprised that Heathrow T4 is the quietest Underground
station.

Read my post again. It *was* the quietest station in 2005.

Remember this? ....
http://www.tuberelief.co.uk/images/heathrow.jpg

Ah. Sorry. Your posting just referred to "latest official figures
(for 2005)", without drawing attention to 2005 being a special
year for T4 station. Now I understand ;-)


PS: I've corrected "quiestest" to "quietest" in the thread title -
can't believe I didn't spot that till now!


So Heathrow Terminal 4 gets less passengers than Rodney Valley?

[sigh] I suppose I have to spell this out to you. In the last set of
official stats from LU, which were for the year 2005, Terminal 4 was
listed as having NO passengers (which you would have realised if you had
followed the links I provided) because it was closed all year while the
junction to the new Terminal 5 station was constructed. (Actually I
think it operated for the first week of January 2005, but that doesn't
seem to have registered in the stats.)

Now that Terminal 4 is open again, and based on other station stats for
2005, it is likely that Roding Valley (NOT Rodney Valley) currently has
the fewest passengers.

You need to be more precise in wording questions of this sort in this
group if you are to avoid being misled by correct but misleading
answers!

Happy New Year.

--
Richard J.
(to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address)

"Richard J." wrote in message
k...
C wrote:
"Martin Underwood" a@b wrote in message
...
Richard J. wrote in message
:

Martin Underwood wrote:
C wrote in message
:

Sorry I should of made it clear.

And you should *have* said "should have", not "should of" ;-)


I'm surprised that Heathrow T4 is the quietest Underground
station.

Read my post again. It *was* the quietest station in 2005.

Remember this? ....
http://www.tuberelief.co.uk/images/heathrow.jpg

Ah. Sorry. Your posting just referred to "latest official figures
(for 2005)", without drawing attention to 2005 being a special
year for T4 station. Now I understand ;-)


PS: I've corrected "quiestest" to "quietest" in the thread title -
can't believe I didn't spot that till now!


So Heathrow Terminal 4 gets less passengers than Rodney Valley?

[sigh] I suppose I have to spell this out to you. In the last set of
official stats from LU, which were for the year 2005, Terminal 4 was
listed as having NO passengers (which you would have realised if you had
followed the links I provided) because it was closed all year while the
junction to the new Terminal 5 station was constructed. (Actually I think
it operated for the first week of January 2005, but that doesn't seem to
have registered in the stats.)

Now that Terminal 4 is open again, and based on other station stats for
2005, it is likely that Roding Valley (NOT Rodney Valley) currently has
the fewest passengers.

You need to be more precise in wording questions of this sort in this
group if you are to avoid being misled by correct but misleading answers!

Happy New Year.

--
Richard J.
(to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address)


Sorry for being so vague.......am I forgiven?

C wrote:
"Richard J." wrote in message
k...
C wrote:
"Martin Underwood" a@b wrote in message
...
Richard J. wrote in message
:

Martin Underwood wrote:
C wrote in message
:

Sorry I should of made it clear.

And you should *have* said "should have", not "should of" ;-)


I'm surprised that Heathrow T4 is the quietest Underground
station.

Read my post again. It *was* the quietest station in 2005.

Remember this? ....
http://www.tuberelief.co.uk/images/heathrow.jpg

Ah. Sorry. Your posting just referred to "latest official figures
(for 2005)", without drawing attention to 2005 being a special
year for T4 station. Now I understand ;-)


PS: I've corrected "quiestest" to "quietest" in the thread title
- can't believe I didn't spot that till now!


So Heathrow Terminal 4 gets less passengers than Rodney Valley?

[sigh] I suppose I have to spell this out to you. In the last
set of official stats from LU, which were for the year 2005,
Terminal 4 was listed as having NO passengers (which you would
have realised if you had followed the links I provided) because it
was closed all year while the junction to the new Terminal 5
station was constructed. (Actually I think it operated for the
first week of January 2005, but that doesn't seem to have
registered in the stats.)

Now that Terminal 4 is open again, and based on other station
stats for 2005, it is likely that Roding Valley (NOT Rodney
Valley) currently has the fewest passengers.

You need to be more precise in wording questions of this sort in
this group if you are to avoid being misled by correct but
misleading answers!

Happy New Year.

Sorry for being so vague.......am I forgiven?

It's still (just) the festive season, so, yes!
--
Richard J.
(to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address)