Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
No Flipping writes
It's people like who you drive up the cost of council tax. Wanting compensation when a quick phone call will probably sort it all out. No - actually it is the di**head overzealous parking attendents who issued a PCN when (allegedly) one should not have been issued which causes shedload of extra admin for the council. And asking the council for compensation is going to help is it? -- Dave |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 11:14:04 +0100, Dave wrote:
No Flipping writes It's people like who you drive up the cost of council tax. Wanting compensation when a quick phone call will probably sort it all out. No - actually it is the di**head overzealous parking attendents who issued a PCN when (allegedly) one should not have been issued which causes shedload of extra admin for the council. And asking the council for compensation is going to help is it? ....well it might make them take more care not to issue illegal tickets in future, so yes, it could. If everyone who received an illegal ticket took action for costs, it wouldn't take long for them to sort it out, saving money in the long term. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Harrison writes
And asking the council for compensation is going to help is it? ...well it might make them take more care not to issue illegal tickets in future, so yes, it could. But the council don't issue the ticket directly. If everyone who received an illegal ticket took action for costs, it wouldn't take long for them to sort it out, saving money in the long term. ********. People will always make mistakes. Parking attendant mis-reads parking restriction plate as Mon-Sat instead of Mon-Fri; simple phone call or letter resolves problem. Are you going to sue for emotional distress as well? Wanting compensation for such things is, quite simply, pathetic. -- Dave |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 12:51:49 +0100, Dave wrote:
Mike Harrison writes And asking the council for compensation is going to help is it? ...well it might make them take more care not to issue illegal tickets in future, so yes, it could. But the council don't issue the ticket directly. But they employ the people who do. If everyone who received an illegal ticket took action for costs, it wouldn't take long for them to sort it out, saving money in the long term. ********. People will always make mistakes. If they know they will get into trouble for issuing bad tickets, they will be more careful Parking attendant mis-reads parking restriction plate as Mon-Sat instead of Mon-Fri; simple phone call or letter resolves problem. Are you going to sue for emotional distress as well? Wanting compensation for such things is, quite simply, pathetic. IF a simple letter or call resolves it, I totally agree but there are no end of stories where councils do not act reasonably/competently and cause significant hassle and cost for the victim. At present they can issue truckloads of bad tickets in the knowledge that some will pay up anyway, and if they don't the worst outcome is that the ticket gets cancelled. If it has to go to the adjudictor and the appeal is upheld then it's usually because the council has failed in its duty to deal fairly & reasonably I think the system should be changed so that when a ticket is overturned by the adjudictor, the appellant should AUTOMATICALLY be awarded the amount of the fine as compensation (i.e. higher award if clamped, towed etc.) , and more at the discretion of the adjudicator if the council have acted unreasonably or incompetently. This policy would vastly reduce the abuses of the system by councils and their contractors. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Harrison writes
I think the system should be changed so that when a ticket is overturned by the adjudictor, the appellant should AUTOMATICALLY be awarded the amount of the fine as compensation (i.e. higher award if clamped, towed etc.) , and more at the discretion of the adjudicator if the council have acted unreasonably or incompetently. Just so long as the system also means that anybody making a frivolous claim for compensation has to pay for the associated costs. -- Dave |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 14:06:52 +0100, Mike Harrison
wrote: On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 12:51:49 +0100, Dave wrote: Mike Harrison writes And asking the council for compensation is going to help is it? ...well it might make them take more care not to issue illegal tickets in future, so yes, it could. But the council don't issue the ticket directly. But they employ the people who do. If everyone who received an illegal ticket took action for costs, it wouldn't take long for them to sort it out, saving money in the long term. ********. People will always make mistakes. If they know they will get into trouble for issuing bad tickets, they will be more careful Parking attendant mis-reads parking restriction plate as Mon-Sat instead of Mon-Fri; simple phone call or letter resolves problem. Are you going to sue for emotional distress as well? Wanting compensation for such things is, quite simply, pathetic. IF a simple letter or call resolves it, I totally agree but there are no end of stories where councils do not act reasonably/competently and cause significant hassle and cost for the victim. At present they can issue truckloads of bad tickets in the knowledge that some will pay up anyway, and if they don't the worst outcome is that the ticket gets cancelled. If it has to go to the adjudictor and the appeal is upheld then it's usually because the council has failed in its duty to deal fairly & reasonably I think the system should be changed so that when a ticket is overturned by the adjudictor, the appellant should AUTOMATICALLY be awarded the amount of the fine as compensation (i.e. higher award if clamped, towed etc.) , and more at the discretion of the adjudicator if the council have acted unreasonably or incompetently. This policy would vastly reduce the abuses of the system by councils and their contractors. If the council hires contractors to do this work then any compensation paid out by the council is a direct result of failure on the part of the contractor. The councils should simply charge the ticketing contractors penalties for each wrongfully issued ticket. That would soon put a stop to the over zealous ticket issuer. Contractor performance penalties have many many precidents in the UK so setting this up shouldn't be too difficult. Andrew |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Tube advice for a transvestite please? | London Transport | |||
Parking ticket - advice, please? | London Transport | |||
Parking ticket - advice, please? | London Transport | |||
Parking ticket - advice, please? | London Transport | |||
Parking ticket - advice, please? | London Transport |