Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() TheOneKEA wrote: Colin Rosenstiel wrote: In article , (TheOneKEA) wrote: Mizter T wrote: Thanks to Matthew, a poster on another thread, my attention has been drawn to the following announcement by Chiltern Railways - I will copy and paste for the sake of the record: From http://www.chilternrailways.co.uk/content.php?nID=4&ID=237 snip What I want to know is why the opportunity to equip Wembley Stadium with Oyster validators and ticket machines was not taken during that station's reconstruction. It seems like such an obvious thing to do that there must be some reason why it was not done. The ITSO standards problem? The agreement that Oyster can co-exist with ITSO-standard smartcards is quite recent. I doubt it - Chiltern's services are so entangled with Oyster now that it seems strange for them to hold out in such a fashion. At the very least, I would suspect that there would be problems expanding the current ad-hoc PAYG agreement for West/South Ruislip-Marylebone to include Wembley Stadium, as AFAIK LU paper tickets comparable to PAYG fares are NOT valid for that journey. LU paper tickets are *not* valid for any journey on Chiltern from West/South Ruislip - whether it be to Marylebone, Wembley Stadium, the Sudbury's or Northolt Park. The fact that Oyster PAYG is valid from West/South Ruislip to Marylebone (only) is because it's a special arrangement between Chiltern and LU, though obviously it is one that offers a fairly easy accounting proceedure as the exact number of people making that journey can be determined from the Oyster database. Bringing Wembley Stadium into the Oyster PAYG fold would be good, but if it was only Wembley that was PAYG enabled and not the Sudburys and Northolt Park I suggest it would be a cause of considerable passenger confusion; also TfL would be keen on the whole line being PAYG enabled rather than having it done in a patchy fashion; plus it would make more sense for the revenue recouperation agreement between Chiltern and TfL to include the whole line. I think it's far better, and indeed more logical, to bring the whole line into Oyster PAYG rather than do it on a station by station basis. Anyway installing Oyster readers is hardly a big proceedure, so it's no big deal it wasn't done when Wembley Stadium was being rebuilt. If Chiltern has wanted to make Wembely a gated station then it would have been sensible for them to have done so during the redevelopment, but they haven't, so adding Oyster readers now is no big deal. |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mizter T wrote:
LU paper tickets are *not* valid for any journey on Chiltern from West/South Ruislip - whether it be to Marylebone, Wembley Stadium, the Sudbury's or Northolt Park. Actually, LU paper tickets *are* valid on Chiltern...but only between the Ruislips, and Amersham to Marylebone. Admittedly, being valid between the Ruislips isn't *that* much use most of the time, given that there aren't that many trains stopping at both during the week. Cheers, Barry |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Barry Salter wrote:
Mizter T wrote: LU paper tickets are *not* valid for any journey on Chiltern from West/South Ruislip - whether it be to Marylebone, Wembley Stadium, the Sudbury's or Northolt Park. Actually, LU paper tickets *are* valid on Chiltern...but only between the Ruislips, and Amersham to Marylebone. Admittedly, being valid between the Ruislips isn't *that* much use most of the time, given that there aren't that many trains stopping at both during the week. Cheers, Barry It's probably more handy in the inbound direction than the outbound - if you're at a Ruislip, you can hop on a Chiltern if one is imminent. -- Dave Arquati www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave A wrote:
Barry Salter wrote: Mizter T wrote: LU paper tickets are *not* valid for any journey on Chiltern from West/South Ruislip - whether it be to Marylebone, Wembley Stadium, the Sudbury's or Northolt Park. Actually, LU paper tickets *are* valid on Chiltern...but only between the Ruislips, and Amersham to Marylebone. Admittedly, being valid between the Ruislips isn't *that* much use most of the time, given that there aren't that many trains stopping at both during the week. Cheers, Barry It's probably more handy in the inbound direction than the outbound - if you're at a Ruislip, you can hop on a Chiltern if one is imminent. You've not ever been to the Ruslips then have you Dave?! IIRC at both the Central line calls at an island platform, whilst the Chiltern platforms (which aren't island platforms at either station) can only be reached by going over the bridge (at West Ruislip) or under the subway (at South Ruislip) from the Central line island platform. It's the kind of mad dash that I'd relish but most wouldn't! Plus, most importantly, many Chiltern trains don't stop at both the Ruislips, making them pretty useless for conveying yourself between them, whilst Central line trains depart most frequently. Of course if you're at a Ruislip heading into town, then - dependent on your ultimate destination of course - a Chiltern train into Marylebone might be just the thing. But only if you're using Oyster PAYG - and not if you've got a printed LU ticket, as it ain't valid for anything other than a Ruislip to Ruislip journey. And AFAICR there's no Chiltern PIS displays in the concourse of either station (though I think there may be a few posters) which I think makes it less likely that people would go by Chiltern on the spur of the moment. By the by, you usenet self seems to have transmogrified into Dave A - I wonder if there's any particular reasoning for your rather late and lacklustre bid at online anonymity? Perhaps I shouldn't ask! ;-) |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mizter T wrote:
Dave A wrote: Barry Salter wrote: Mizter T wrote: LU paper tickets are *not* valid for any journey on Chiltern from West/South Ruislip - whether it be to Marylebone, Wembley Stadium, the Sudbury's or Northolt Park. Actually, LU paper tickets *are* valid on Chiltern...but only between the Ruislips, and Amersham to Marylebone. Admittedly, being valid between the Ruislips isn't *that* much use most of the time, given that there aren't that many trains stopping at both during the week. Cheers, Barry It's probably more handy in the inbound direction than the outbound - if you're at a Ruislip, you can hop on a Chiltern if one is imminent. You've not ever been to the Ruslips then have you Dave?! IIRC at both the Central line calls at an island platform, whilst the Chiltern platforms (which aren't island platforms at either station) can only be reached by going over the bridge (at West Ruislip) or under the subway (at South Ruislip) from the Central line island platform. It's the kind of mad dash that I'd relish but most wouldn't! Plus, most importantly, many Chiltern trains don't stop at both the Ruislips, making them pretty useless for conveying yourself between them, whilst Central line trains depart most frequently. I certainly have been to the Ruislips a number of times, to make connections from the Central line to Chiltern to High Wycombe and vice versa. I was thinking more of being aware upon arrival at the station that a Chiltern train was about to arrive, rather than a mad dash. Of course if you're at a Ruislip heading into town, then - dependent on your ultimate destination of course - a Chiltern train into Marylebone might be just the thing. But only if you're using Oyster PAYG - and not if you've got a printed LU ticket, as it ain't valid for anything other than a Ruislip to Ruislip journey. And AFAICR there's no Chiltern PIS displays in the concourse of either station (though I think there may be a few posters) which I think makes it less likely that people would go by Chiltern on the spur of the moment. Quite likely. I was really thinking of people familiar with the timetable or with the excellent WAP Live Departures service (which I swear by). By the by, you usenet self seems to have transmogrified into Dave A - I wonder if there's any particular reasoning for your rather late and lacklustre bid at online anonymity? Perhaps I shouldn't ask! ;-) My computer celebrated the new year with a complete hard disk failure in which I lost everything I hadn't backed up (which seems to be quite a lot of stuff, including email settings)... I'm still fiddling around bringing everything back to its pre-death state! -- Dave Arquati www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Dave A
writes My computer celebrated the new year with a complete hard disk failure in which I lost everything I hadn't backed up (which seems to be quite a lot of stuff, including email settings)... I'm still fiddling around bringing everything back to its pre-death state! You're not alone, Dave. :-) Mine went down on 12 December. After a *lot* of work, most stuff is restored now but it was an *anguishing* process. (Demon's "Helpdesk" managed to cause my only e-mail loss in the affair, though, showing me how to reconnect and download three weeks' worth of e-mails and then talking me through the reinstallation of the backed up files.......which promptly over-wrote the newly downloaded stuff!) -- Ian Jelf, MITG Birmingham, UK Registered Blue Badge Tourist Guide for London and the Heart of England http://www.bluebadge.demon.co.uk |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave A wrote:
My computer celebrated the new year with a complete hard disk failure in which I lost everything I hadn't backed up (which seems to be quite a lot of stuff, including email settings)... I'm still fiddling around bringing everything back to its pre-death state! Sympathies, Dave. Mine suffered a RAM failure last October. Luckily all I've not got backed up is a few photographs and some odds and sods. It takes an age to get a machine set up to your own preferences doesn't it? Sodde's law: the new drive bays are a different size, so I can't even drop the old hard drive into the new machine. Life's never easy! |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() TfL have aspirations to introduce Oyster PAYG as far as High Wycombe, and possibly Princes Risborough / Aylesbury: http://www.tfl.gov.uk/rail/downloads...dary_May06.pdf Interesting. For me such a feature would avoid the curious hard-coded route I'm sold the occasional times I take the train that way - Central line "via S [or W] Ruislip" which can involve 50min wait in the relevant Ruislip if the sales office has miscalculated arrival times in the transfer station onto a Chiltern. PAYG would be an improvement, and would be a welcome reversal of the TOCs' bad habits of selling inflexible tickets for high prices. Not sure letting Livingstone loose beyond is a good idea though... -- Old anti-spam address cmylod at despammed dot com appears broke So back to cmylod at bigfoot dot com Just noticed this: http://www.chilternrailways.co.uk/up...ations/342.pdf On the second page, under Major improvements for 2007: Chiltern Railways state "Amongst the changes you can look forward to in 2007 a Oystercards extended to Aylesbury and High Wycombe Ticket gates at Gerrards Cross, Beaconsfield and Leamington Spa". On a related note, I see that ticket gates are being installed at City Thameslink and Blackfriars. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Oyster good on chiltern? | London Transport | |||
Chiltern and Virgin on Great Western. | London Transport | |||
Reduction in Chiltern Services and Funding of Shared Met Line | London Transport | |||
Chiltern line at Marylebone this Evening | London Transport | |||
Chiltern plans for West Hampstead | London Transport |