Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks to Matthew, a poster on another thread, my attention has been
drawn to the following announcement by Chiltern Railways - I will copy and paste for the sake of the record: From http://www.chilternrailways.co.uk/content.php?nID=4&ID=237 -------------------- We are the first to sell the complete TfL Oyster range Date: 09 Jan 2007 16:12 Award-winning Chiltern Railways is the first train company in the United Kingdom to sell the complete range of Transport for London smartcard products at their main London Marylebone station. Passengers can now purchase all products including Pay As You go Oyster for the London Underground and has sold their first annual Oyster card on Fastis, new booking office ticket machines. Commercial Director Neil Micklethwaite said: "We have worked very closely with Transport for London, ATOC and our ticket machine suppliers, Cubic Transportation Systems to bring this facility to London Marylebone station. "Previously passengers could wait up to 15 minutes to purchase an annual season ticket from booking offices but through making our new machines Oyster compatible we have increased this service dramatically. "It has cost us an additional £120,000 to make our Fastis machines at London Marylebone compatible with Oyster and we can even sell Pay As You Go to London Underground passengers. "Fastis machines, located in all of our booking offices, speeds up face-to-face ticket sales by 50%. Chiltern Railways has recently upgraded their booking office ticket machines to Fastis with an £800,000 investment, and were the first to to sell an annual season ticket. "We are also happy to announce that we are working very hard with Transport for London on being the first train company to sell Oyster Smartcards outside London. We will be launching this to our passengers in 2007," he said. Brian Cooke, Chairman of London TravelWatch said "We are delighted that passengers at Marylebone station will be able to purchase and recharge their Oyster cards there. We hope other train operators will soon follow the excellent lead set by Chiltern Railways." -------------------- This is basically two separate bits of news about Chiltern and Oyster. In the main it concerns the fact that Chiltern can now retail the full range of Oyster ticketing products at their Marylebone ticket office (1) - apparently the first TOC to be able to do so. It also states that Chiltern will sell Oyster outside London (2). Whilst these two things are to an extent interconnected I'll deal with them separately. (1) Chiltern's claim to be the first TOC selling the complete range of Oyster ticketing products does seem like a bit odd. I thought that certain National Rail (NR) stations already sold Oyster - specifically stations that were served by LU, such as the many Silverlink stations served by the Bakerloo line, plus others such as Richmond (managed by SWT), New Cross Gate (Southern) and New Cross (Southeastern). Ticket offices at these stations are able to top-up Oyster PAYG credit, and I presumed they could also sell the whole range of Travelcard season tickets - at Kensington Olympia, when buying a weekly Travelcard fairly recently I was certainly asked whether I would like it on Oyster or on a printed ticket. Perhaps these stations aren't able to issue monthly and/or annual Travelcards on Oyster? Or perhaps the way they issue/recharge Oyster cards is through the use of separate equipment, similar to that used by a newsagent, so this is the first time that Oyster issuing functions have been fully integrated into the ticket issuing equipment. That said, it doesn't look like any of the stations that already issue/recharge Oyster have the same green Oyster ticket machine kit as used by newsagents; also, at Kensington Olmypia, the Oyster pad appears to have been attached to the old APTIS ticket machine (something like this one [1] - BTW it's still in use this past week, I'm sure it'll be replaced very soon). Perhaps when these stations sell Travelcards on Oyster it is merely as if they're an agent for TfL (akin to a newsagent) rather than selling the ticket directly 'themselves', if you see what I mean - i.e. when they sell a monthly/annual Travelcard on Oyster the sale is credited directly to Chiltern and the passengers details appear in Chiltern's database. I don't know. All in all, as you can probably gather, I'm unconvinced by Chiltern's claim to be "the first train company in the UK to sell the complete range of TfL smartcard [i.e. Oyster] products". (2) Chiltern are "working hard" with TfL to sell Oyster outside London. I'm sure I've also read here on utl that 'one' have similar plans. I'm intrigued as to what this will actually mean. I see two possibilities... * Chiltern will merely sell season tickets on Oyster (whether they be season tickets with inclusive Travelcards to London, or indeed a season ticket for any journey on their route). This would not really be any different to the present situation, the only change being the medium on which the ticket is held - i.e. electronically on Oyster as opposed to on paper. Given that there's no benefit in doing such a thing (apart from making it a bit easier to get through the gates) this seems unlikely, though still possible. * The second and far more revolutionary change would involve Oyster being implemented for Pay-as-you-go use _outside_ the London zones. How this might work is a fascinating prospect... ~ How many Chiltern stations would it cover, all of them, or just those closer to London? ~ How would it work in relation to daily price capping - would journeys outside of the zonal area merely be charged separately whilst normal capping would apply within the zones, or would there be a special 'Chiltern daily cap' that might apply if several out-of-zone Chiltern journeys were made? ~ Would Chiltern operate their own zonal system, a bit like zones A-D on the Metropolitan line? ~ How would any Chiltern implementation of Oyster work with that implemented on other TOCs such as 'one', or would they retain totally separate Oyster fare regimes? If anyone does know anything more specific about this development I'd be most interested to hear it. ----- [1] http://therailticketgallery.fotopic.net/p2224852.html |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mizter T ) gurgled happily, sounding much like they were
saying : ~ Would Chiltern operate their own zonal system, a bit like zones A-D on the Metropolitan line? And there you touch on one possible reason they've done this... that they already accept Oyster PAYG on the gates at Marylebone, because PAYG is valid on the Aylesbury via Amersham route as far as Amersham. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Adrian wrote:
Mizter T ) gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying : ~ Would Chiltern operate their own zonal system, a bit like zones A-D on the Metropolitan line? And there you touch on one possible reason they've done this... that they already accept Oyster PAYG on the gates at Marylebone, because PAYG is valid on the Aylesbury via Amersham route as far as Amersham. I forgot to mention that Chiltern does indeed accept Oyster PAYG from Amersham (zone D) into Marylebone. However I'd suggest that this is because it shares the route with the LU Metropolitan line, and British Rail / Chiltern Railways and LU tickets have always (well, not always, but for a good while) been interavailable between Amersham and Marylebone/Baker Street - i.e. you can use the ticket of one company on the services of the other. I should add that I don't know the detailed history of this ticketing interavailability! Therefore, if Oyster PAYG is a form of LU ticketing it is thus available for use on Chiltern. All that said, Oyster PAYG is available from West and South Ruislip to Marylebone, whilst printed LU tickets _do_not_ have interavailable validity on this route. So Chiltern have obviously come to some sort of deal with LU here. Indeed I guess that Chiltern have a more extensive deal with LU regarding Oyster PAYG. AIUI the way revenue sharing works under printed tickets on the shared Chiltern/Met section is that whoever sells the ticket keeps the cash. I suspect that there's a slightly more sophisticated formula when it comes to revenue sharing from Oyster PAYG journeys, as such a scheme wouldn't really make sense. But I agree with your underlying point - Chiltern are already familiar with Oyster PAYG, and already have a close working relationship with LU, which has meant they are more amenable, enthusiastic even, about the prospect of extending the Oyster system to work elsewhere on their routes than other TOCs are. That said, I await to see whether they are actually interested in using Oyster PAYG outside the zones, or whether they just wish to issue their season tickets in the form of Oyster - which wouldn't count as any great shakes in my book. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() ~ How many Chiltern stations would it cover, all of them, or just those closer to London? TfL have aspirations to introduce Oyster PAYG as far as High Wycombe, and possibly Princes Risborough / Aylesbury: http://www.tfl.gov.uk/rail/downloads...dary_May06.pdf Dorridge to Stourbridge will be covered by Centro's smartcard: http://www.centro.org.uk/source/WMPT...March_2006.htm Chiltern's aims for London - Birmingham journeys seem to be focusing on e-tickets and mobile tickets, which just leaves Dorridge/Stratford - High Wycombe, which i can't see much effort being devoted to. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12 Jan 2007 13:20:16 -0800, "Matthew Dickinson"
wrote: TfL have aspirations to introduce Oyster PAYG as far as High Wycombe, and possibly Princes Risborough / Aylesbury: http://www.tfl.gov.uk/rail/downloads...dary_May06.pdf Interesting. For me such a feature would avoid the curious hard-coded route I'm sold the occasional times I take the train that way - Central line "via S [or W] Ruislip" which can involve 50min wait in the relevant Ruislip if the sales office has miscalculated arrival times in the transfer station onto a Chiltern. PAYG would be an improvement, and would be a welcome reversal of the TOCs' bad habits of selling inflexible tickets for high prices. Not sure letting Livingstone loose beyond is a good idea though... -- Old anti-spam address cmylod at despammed dot com appears broke So back to cmylod at bigfoot dot com |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mizter T wrote:
Thanks to Matthew, a poster on another thread, my attention has been drawn to the following announcement by Chiltern Railways - I will copy and paste for the sake of the record: From http://www.chilternrailways.co.uk/content.php?nID=4&ID=237 snip What I want to know is why the opportunity to equip Wembley Stadium with Oyster validators and ticket machines was not taken during that station's reconstruction. It seems like such an obvious thing to do that there must be some reason why it was not done. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In reply to news post, which Mizter T wrote on Fri,
12 Jan 2007 - Adrian wrote: I forgot to mention that Chiltern does indeed accept Oyster PAYG from Amersham (zone D) into Marylebone. However I'd suggest that this is because it shares the route with the LU Metropolitan line, and British Rail / Chiltern Railways and LU tickets have always (well, not always, but for a good while) been interavailable between Amersham and Marylebone/Baker Street - i.e. you can use the ticket of one company on the services of the other. I should add that I don't know the detailed history of this ticketing interavailability! From the early 20th century the line from just past Finchley Road to beyond Aylesbury was a joint line original operated by the Metropolitan Railway and Great Central Railway. This joint arrangement has existed in one form or another since then and the various organisations / companies that succeeded the original joint operators have taken part. Tickets have always been inter changeable. The pricing of tickets out to Amersham follows the LU zonal structure, I would suggest the prices of tickets out to Wycombe are not comparable, they seem more expensive to me! -- Matthew P Jones www.ThisIsAmersham.com www.amersham.org.uk www.metroland.org.uk Don't reply directly it will not be read. You can reply to knap AT Nildram then dot co then dot uk |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matthew P Jones wrote:
The pricing of tickets out to Amersham follows the LU zonal structure, I would suggest the prices of tickets out to Wycombe are not comparable, they seem more expensive to me! Absolutely. It was only about fifteen years ago that the Aylesbury to Marylebone fare was standardised for both routes. Prior to that, tickets between Aylesbury and Marylebone via Wycombe were dearer than via Amersham (although, IIRC, monthly or longer seasons were accepted on both routes). |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Colin Rosenstiel wrote:
In article , (TheOneKEA) wrote: Mizter T wrote: Thanks to Matthew, a poster on another thread, my attention has been drawn to the following announcement by Chiltern Railways - I will copy and paste for the sake of the record: From http://www.chilternrailways.co.uk/content.php?nID=4&ID=237 snip What I want to know is why the opportunity to equip Wembley Stadium with Oyster validators and ticket machines was not taken during that station's reconstruction. It seems like such an obvious thing to do that there must be some reason why it was not done. The ITSO standards problem? The agreement that Oyster can co-exist with ITSO-standard smartcards is quite recent. I doubt it - Chiltern's services are so entangled with Oyster now that it seems strange for them to hold out in such a fashion. At the very least, I would suspect that there would be problems expanding the current ad-hoc PAYG agreement for West/South Ruislip-Marylebone to include Wembley Stadium, as AFAIK LU paper tickets comparable to PAYG fares are NOT valid for that journey. Considering the earbashing Chiltern gets about their lack of trains at the Sudbury stations, making up for it by allowing Oyster PAYG travel to and from Wembley Stadium (and later, maybe Northolt Park) would have helped somewhat. Besides, the PR opportunity would surely be useful ("Chiltern Railways is first TOC to fully embrace Oyster"). |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Oyster good on chiltern? | London Transport | |||
Chiltern and Virgin on Great Western. | London Transport | |||
Reduction in Chiltern Services and Funding of Shared Met Line | London Transport | |||
Chiltern line at Marylebone this Evening | London Transport | |||
Chiltern plans for West Hampstead | London Transport |