eastender wrote:

John B wrote:

Boltar wrote:

Y0 br0, u 15 54d gr4nd4d h4ng1ng wit d4 1ee7 p055y , 5af3 y34h? 0r 15 u
ju57
t4lk1ng 5h1t?


I think EE's point may have just been proven.

I think he had fun trying to put himself in the shoes of a 13 year old.

Just following your example.

Sadly, he hasn't half his knickers in a text.

Though 13 year olds would have somewhat better grammar than the above.

B2003

On 18 Jan 2007 01:37:35 -0800, "Boltar"
wrote:


eastender wrote:

John B wrote:

Boltar wrote:

Y0 br0, u 15 54d gr4nd4d h4ng1ng wit d4 1ee7 p055y , 5af3 y34h? 0r 15 u
ju57
t4lk1ng 5h1t?


I think EE's point may have just been proven.

I think he had fun trying to put himself in the shoes of a 13 year old.

Just following your example.

Sadly, he hasn't half his knickers in a text.

Though 13 year olds would have somewhat better grammar than the above.

And where might they have learnt that from?

John B wrote:
Jonathan Morris wrote:
Perhaps it's time we started to think the same way about these things
(it doesn't mean you don't have sympathy for the family, especially if
they didn't know what their kids were doing). You just know that over
here, there will be an inquiry and a family will possibly end up suing,
and winning, compensation from LUL, the driver or maybe the security
guard/s for scaring them and making them panic...

You think that the UK is *more* nannyish and litigious than the US?
That's an impressive disconnect from reality.

In real life, there will not be an enquiry, nobody will sue anyone and
no compensation will be awarded - I'd happily bet £500 on that, if
anyone's up for it.

Despite occasional Political Correctness Gone Mad rants in the Daily
Wail, it is simply not the case in the UK that criminals are awarded
compensation for the injuries they acquire during their crimes.

I do wonder why these Daily Mail eternely bitter souls knowingly make
things up for their rants, are they just simply deluded, is their life
so crap that making things up to complain about means they shift blame
for their situation onto non-existant others rather than themselves.

Interesting that he uses the term "do good" as an insult, perhaps
starting to "do good" themself would cheer them up and mean they can
stop being so miserable.