Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 15:14:00 +0000, Tony Polson wrote:
On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 13:11:11 GMT, Sky Rider wrote: Recently I've noticed that a mixture of automatic and manual ticket gates are being installed at City Thameslink. What I'd like to know is: 1 - why the gates at the Holborn Viaduct end are installed in a position such that one of the ticket office windows is subsequently located in the 'paid-area' of the station (once the gateline goes live), For payment of excess fares? Such windows are common. The one at Leeds usually has a long queue in front of it. This is principally due to it being physically impossible for a guard to cope adequately with ticket sales on heavily-laden suburban trains with frequent stops. -- Regards Mike mikedotroebuckatgmxdotnet |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Roland Perry" wrote: Peter Masson remarked: The passenger may have started at a station where the ticket office was not open. If he had purchased a PTT he will not be liable for a penalty fare, but will have to exchange the PTT for the appropriate ticket. Trains which serve City Thameslink are DOO, so it is not normally possible to exchange a PTT for a ticket on the train. Yes, that's a possibility, but for a tiny minority of passengers. I expect the rest will be asked to pay a penalty fare. Really? The excess fare window at my local station (Barking) does a brisk trade in ticket sales, and it is evident that few questions are asked, despite both c2c and London Underground operating a Penalty Fare scheme in this area. Chris |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sky Rider wrote:
Visiting the British Museum? It was a visit to the University of London (near SOAS) as part of a Modern Languauges A-Level course. Erm... SOAS *is* part of the University of London! Was it Senate House? |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chris Read wrote:
Yes, that's a possibility, but for a tiny minority of passengers. I expect the rest will be asked to pay a penalty fare. Really? The excess fare window at my local station (Barking) does a brisk trade in ticket sales, and it is evident that few questions are asked, despite both c2c and London Underground operating a Penalty Fare scheme in this area. But Silverlink doesn't - few if any of the Gospel Oak-Barking stations have ticket machines and at peak hours the trains are too packed for sellers/inspectors to make their way along. |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 17:31:51 -0000, Roland Perry
wrote: In message , at 16:38:42 on Sat, 27 Jan 2007, Peter Masson remarked: It is usual, these days, to have a ticket office window on the "wrong" side of the barriers... it allows people who don't have tickets for the journey they've just made to buy one so they can leave the station. Really? I thought the practice was to demand a penalty fare from such individuals (as Cherie discovered). The passenger may have started at a station where the ticket office was not open. If he had purchased a PTT he will not be liable for a penalty fare, but will have to exchange the PTT for the appropriate ticket. Trains which serve City Thameslink are DOO, so it is not normally possible to exchange a PTT for a ticket on the train. Yes, that's a possibility, but for a tiny minority of passengers. I expect the rest will be asked to pay a penalty fare. You are a Doubting Thomas aren't you! When me and my mate visited our girlfriends in Radlett, we would ALWAYS buy a 5p PTT on the way home. And we were the shyest of shysters going. Unfortunately, the ticket office at West Hampstead was always shut as well. C'est la vie! 5p or the risk of a PF? Your choice. -- Fig |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tim Roll-Pickering wrote:
Erm... SOAS *is* part of the University of London! I know that, except that I didn't know whether the particular building I went to was SOAS territory or not. Was it Senate House? Yes - that's the one. |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 19:22:33 on
Sat, 27 Jan 2007, Chris Read remarked: Yes, that's a possibility, but for a tiny minority of passengers. I expect the rest will be asked to pay a penalty fare. Really? Yes, the "possibility" referred to above is the passenger boarding at a station with the need to get a PTT and then needing to exit at a FCC/Thameslink station (and therefore needing an excess fares window inside the barrier line). Compared to people who deliberately boarded somewhere without a ticket (or bought short) and then try to buy a ticket at the destination when they discover a barrier line. The excess fare window at my local station (Barking) does a brisk trade in ticket sales, and it is evident that few questions are asked, despite both c2c and London Underground operating a Penalty Fare scheme in this area. So they have a less aggressive policy than FCC (probably due to the different culture at a joint LUL/NR station). -- Roland Perry |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message op.tmt5t6tvm4iaeb@dell, at 23:21:32 on Sat, 27 Jan 2007,
Fig remarked: You are a Doubting Thomas aren't you! When me and my mate visited our girlfriends in Radlett, we would ALWAYS buy a 5p PTT on the way home. And we were the shyest of shysters going. Unfortunately, the ticket office at West Hampstead was always shut as well. C'est la vie! 5p or the risk of a PF? Your choice. I agree that some stations on the Thameslink line have been very lightly policed in the past. I regularly used City Thameslink (during the working day) and maybe had a ticket check (manual, obviously) at most one time in ten. However, the discussion here has arisen because the Thameslink is now under FCC's control and they are adding gatelines at several stations, and have a much stronger reputation for revenue protection. I went through Luton Airport Parkway earlier this week, and it had several staff manning the barriers, including well after the evening rush (I had to ask one to retrieve my ticket after the barrier ate it, and I needed it for my expenses). -- Roland Perry |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sky Rider wrote:
Erm... SOAS *is* part of the University of London! I know that, except that I didn't know whether the particular building I went to was SOAS territory or not. Was it Senate House? Yes - that's the one. Senate House isn't really "SOAS territory" any more than Birkbeck is. It's owned by the central university, with several central institutes based in it. |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 01:11:11PM +0000, Sky Rider wrote:
2 - have they installed enough gates at both ends of the station (available space permitting) to avoid a repeat of the peak-hour crush at Farringdon? At least when I've used City Thameslink it's not been particularly busy. This is normally at the end of the morning peak, at a time when London Bridge (for example) is heaving. -- David Cantrell | top google result for "topless karaoke murders" If you have received this email in error, please add some nutmeg and egg whites, whisk, and place in a warm oven for 40 minutes. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Oyster PAYG gateline experiment | London Transport | |||
UTS Gateline codes | London Transport | |||
Stratford Jubilee gateline defunct | London Transport | |||
Wandsworth Town station gateline | London Transport | |||
Waterloo gateline | London Transport |