Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
A recent post on uk.railway offers the latest passenger satisfaction
survey, sampling 25,000 rail users. http://www.passengerfocus.org.uk/new...e.asp?dsid=845 The overall picture is pretty upbeat - 81% of passengers nationally were satisfied with the service, although this hides variations at the level of TOC and of the aspect of service. In London and the south east, the report shows a marked uplift over the least four years in overall satisfaction for many of our operators - most notably Southern, Southeastern, Silverlink and South West Trains, and to a lesser extent c2c (where they started at a higher level anyway). First Capital Connect (incl. predecessors, I believe) satisfaction levels have risen but are now tailing off, and One, First Great Western and Chiltern are all fluctuating around the same levels (Chiltern's level being somewhat higher). Opinions on punctuality and reliability have shot up since 2002 for Southern, Southeastern, Silverlink, South West Trains, First Capital Connect and c2c. However, customers have been and remain fairly poorly satisfied by the TOC's methods of dealing with delays. Satisfaction with information provision has risen slowly for most, but with a clearer rise for SWT and a drop over the last couple of years for Chiltern. Satisfaction with connections to other public transport has increased pretty well for all London TOCs - I find this interesting as I'm not sure why - perhaps better buses in London, or better integration using PlusBus outside. Despite overall high satisfaction levels, London rail users are unsurprisingly poorly satisfied by value for money (more so than anywhere else). Chiltern appears to consistently stand ahead of the pack on this at around 50% satisfied. The low is One with only about 30% satisfied. Opinion on crowding is (surprisingly to me) mixed, with the high being Chiltern at around 70% satisfied, and the low being Southeastern at just over 50% satisfied. The stand out operator is Heathrow Express, with 96% of customers satisfied (and 0% actually dissatisfied). Its weaknesses were pparently car parking (although I'm not sure why anyone would expect to park and ride on Heathrow Express) and value for money. Strengths were speed (scheudled) and "the ease of being able to get on and off". Chiltern is pretty high at 90% satisfied, weaknesses being availability of staff and value for money, strengths being punctuality/reliability and "the ease of being able to get on and off". The low is One, with 10% dissatisfied (75% satisfied), top weaknesses being availability of staff and toilet facilities. Strengths were connections to other public transport and speed. -- Dave Arquati www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Ken to TOCs - end of January deadline to sign up for Oyster PAYG | London Transport | |||
Revenue sharing between TfL and TOCs | London Transport | |||
Mile End Passenger Incident | London Transport | |||
Trivia: Declining passenger numbers | London Transport | |||
Passenger charter vouchers and Oystercard | London Transport |