Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Boltar wrote:
On Jan 30, 10:30 pm, Stuart wrote: Boltar wrote: I've noticed the victoria line seems to be much warmer than the other lines these days (or maybe it always has been but I've not noticed). Is this because the trains are more frequent , or they use up more energy on ATO , or the tunnel ventilation isn't so good , or is there some other reason? Always has been hotter (well as long as i've been travelling on it). I've asked this before on here, the answer i got was that it's to do with the fact that the Vic line is completely underground and so the trains don't have any fresh air to cool off in except when they go to the depot. I'm not convinced its because its completely underground. After all the northern line is underground all the way from mordon to east finchley and golders green. Quite long enough for the tunnels to build up huge amounts of heat but its not as hot as the victoria line , which does have the surface exit to the depot near seven sisters anyway. Northern Line stations strike me as being generally bigger, maybe that helps with airflow. Also, Victoria line is the busiest (isn't it) - people are hot (en masse). -- Larry Lard The address is real, but unread - please reply to the group |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 31, 9:39 am, "Boltar" wrote:
On Jan 30, 10:30 pm, Stuart wrote: Boltar wrote: I've noticed the victoria line seems to be much warmer than the other lines these days (or maybe it always has been but I've not noticed). Is this because the trains are more frequent , or they use up more energy on ATO , or the tunnel ventilation isn't so good , or is there some other reason? Always has been hotter (well as long as i've been travelling on it). I've asked this before on here, the answer i got was that it's to do with the fact that the Vic line is completely underground and so the trains don't have any fresh air to cool off in except when they go to the depot. I'm not convinced its because its completely underground. After all the northern line is underground all the way from mordon to east finchley and golders green. Quite long enough for the tunnels to build up huge amounts of heat but its not as hot as the victoria line , which does have the surface exit to the depot near seven sisters anyway. B2003 Yes, but I think that the longest that a Northern line train will be below ground is less than 1 hour (from Morden to East Finchley via Bank is 56-57 mins according to the journey planner) and trains can have a slightly longer turn around time at Morden as there are three platforms in the open. On the Victoria line though, end to end time is 35 mins and the turn around time is taken underground. I think the important difference is the addition of cold air into the hot trains, which only happens on the Victoria line when they goto the depot at Northumberland Park and even then this assumes that the trains open their doors whilst the driver changes ends. On the Northern line, trains will stand for a few mins with their doors open at each terminal. It is not that the tunnels that are particularly warmer; I commute through Stockwell and I don't think the Victoria line platforms are generally any warmer than the Northern lines ones at the stations I use, but the trains on the Victoria are definately warmer. On the other hand, I think that the coolest stations (when it is hot outside) are those on the Jubilee line extension, where there is much more space for the heat generated by passengers to dissapate. I don't know whther the ages of the trains on the Victoria has anything to do with the temperature, but I would hope that the new trains on the Victoria will be better designed for their underground lifestyle. |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Andy" wrote in message
oups.com I don't know whther the ages of the trains on the Victoria has anything to do with the temperature, but I would hope that the new trains on the Victoria will be better designed for their underground lifestyle. The Victoria Line trains are of similar vintage (ie, similar traction packages) to the Piccadilly Line, but being driven automatically probably means that they are driven harder (ie, fiercer acceleration and braking). But I think that the 'all underground' theory is almost certainly the right one. |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 31, 9:40 am, "Boltar" wrote:
On Jan 30, 8:28 pm, "Andy" wrote: "Boltar" wrote in message oups.com... I've noticed the victoria line seems to be much warmer than the other lines these days (or maybe it always has been but I've not noticed). Is this because the trains are more frequent , or they use up more energy on ATO , or the tunnel ventilation isn't so good , or is there some other reason? B2003 The CCO (Coasting Control Override) trial might have some effect. Whats this then? B2003 I'm not sure if the CCO would be an issue - it's only enabled on three stretches: Seven Sisters - Finsbury Park (southbound only) Oxford Circus - Green Park (southbound only) Green Park - Victoria (southbound only) For anyone interested this features keeps the motor going rather than coasting once the train's reached its maximum speed. I think the heat issue is more likely to be caused by people not opening the end of car windows on a stock that, otherwise, has quite limited air circulation. When the end-car windows are open at both ends I think the trains are pretty reasonable temperature-wise Tom |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 1, 1:38 pm, "Tom Page" wrote:
For anyone interested this features keeps the motor going rather than coasting once the train's reached its maximum speed. I think the heat Whats the advantage of that? Wouldn't it just waste electricity and cause excess heat as mentioned? B2003 |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1 Feb, 14:03, "Boltar" wrote:
On Feb 1, 1:38 pm, "Tom Page" wrote: For anyone interested this features keeps the motor going rather than coasting once the train's reached its maximum speed. I think the heat Whats the advantage of that? Wouldn't it just waste electricity and cause excess heat as mentioned? B2003 It's not exactly rocket science that if one coasts one loses speed due to friction, so keeping the motor going allows faster journey speeds. Of course, the benefit of this has to be weighed up against energy use and maintenance requirements. Tom |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 1, 2:59 pm, "Tom Page" wrote:
On 1 Feb, 14:03, "Boltar" wrote: On Feb 1, 1:38 pm, "Tom Page" wrote: For anyone interested this features keeps the motor going rather than coasting once the train's reached its maximum speed. I think the heat Whats the advantage of that? Wouldn't it just waste electricity and cause excess heat as mentioned? B2003 It's not exactly rocket science that if one coasts one loses speed due to friction, so keeping the motor going allows faster journey speeds. Because of their weight and lack of rolling resistence trains tend to lose speed far less quickly than other sorts of wheeled vehicles so it would be interesting to see just how much speed a vic train would loose when coasting. Of course if the track has a gradient that will make a big difference. Surely though the logical thing would be to have the motors cut back in when the speed had dropped by a few mph rather than having them on constantly? B2003 |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Andy" wrote in message oups.com... On Jan 31, 9:39 am, "Boltar" wrote: On Jan 30, 10:30 pm, Stuart wrote: Boltar wrote: I've noticed the victoria line seems to be much warmer than the other lines these days (or maybe it always has been but I've not noticed). Is this because the trains are more frequent , or they use up more energy on ATO , or the tunnel ventilation isn't so good , or is there some other reason? Always has been hotter (well as long as i've been travelling on it). I've asked this before on here, the answer i got was that it's to do with the fact that the Vic line is completely underground and so the trains don't have any fresh air to cool off in except when they go to the depot. I'm not convinced its because its completely underground. After all the northern line is underground all the way from mordon to east finchley and golders green. Quite long enough for the tunnels to build up huge amounts of heat but its not as hot as the victoria line , which does have the surface exit to the depot near seven sisters anyway. B2003 Yes, but I think that the longest that a Northern line train will be below ground is less than 1 hour (from Morden to East Finchley via Bank is 56-57 mins according to the journey planner) and trains can have a slightly longer turn around time at Morden as there are three platforms in the open. On the Victoria line though, end to end time is 35 mins and the turn around time is taken underground. I think the important difference is the addition of cold air into the hot trains, which only happens on the Victoria line when they goto the depot at Northumberland Park and even then this assumes that the trains open their doors whilst the driver changes ends. On the Northern line, trains will stand for a few mins with their doors open at each terminal. It is not that the tunnels that are particularly warmer; I commute through Stockwell and I don't think the Victoria line platforms are generally any warmer than the Northern lines ones at the stations I use, but the trains on the Victoria are definately warmer. On the other hand, I think that the coolest stations (when it is hot outside) are those on the Jubilee line extension, where there is much more space for the heat generated by passengers to dissapate. I don't know whther the ages of the trains on the Victoria has anything to do with the temperature, but I would hope that the new trains on the Victoria will be better designed for their underground lifestyle. The Central, Northern and Jubilee lines use stock with more modern control and braking systems, which do not generate so much heat. When the Vic stock is replaced in 2009, it should run cooler. The Bakerloo is also notably hot, and the Picc is at times. |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Boltar wrote: On Jan 30, 10:30 pm, Stuart wrote: Boltar wrote: I've noticed the victoria line seems to be much warmer than the other lines these days (or maybe it always has been but I've not noticed). Is this because the trains are more frequent , or they use up more energy on ATO , or the tunnel ventilation isn't so good , or is there some other reason? Always has been hotter (well as long as i've been travelling on it). I've asked this before on here, the answer i got was that it's to do with the fact that the Vic line is completely underground and so the trains don't have any fresh air to cool off in except when they go to the depot. I'm not convinced its because its completely underground. After all the northern line is underground all the way from mordon to east finchley and golders green. Quite long enough for the tunnels to build up huge amounts of heat On a cold winter's morning, the southbound Picc trains arriving at Finsbury Park are often still really cold to the touch, even though they've been below ground a few stops, so I think just having ANY amount of open air section would have a significant effect on lowering the temperature. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Do any southbound DLR trains terminate at Mudchute these days? | London Transport | |||
Whats up with the Met line these days? | London Transport | |||
Met line reliability these days | London Transport | |||
Whats happening on the Aldgate branch these days? | London Transport | |||
Are We Too Politically Correct These Days? | London Transport |