Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Roland Perry" wrote In the depot. The first thing you'd have done is cleared the running tracks. Without traction power? And who would clear the rolling stock, precisely? The Royal Household? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Andrew Clark
writes Without traction power? And who would clear the rolling stock, precisely? The Royal Household? It used to be a sackable offence to leave any train standing on a line BR or LT, so unless rules have changed, all trains will have a driver on board and the depot is most likely to be where their car is to get home. -- Clive. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Clive Coleman." wrote It used to be a sackable offence to leave any train standing on a line BR or LT, so unless rules have changed, all trains will have a driver on board and the depot is most likely to be where their car is to get home. But an electric train stranded out the line with no power is not going to go anywhere, whatever the signals say. Peter |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Masson" wrote in message ... "Clive Coleman." wrote It used to be a sackable offence to leave any train standing on a line BR or LT, so unless rules have changed, all trains will have a driver on board and the depot is most likely to be where their car is to get home. But an electric train stranded out the line with no power is not going to go anywhere, whatever the signals say. Peter And quite probably because there is no traction supply there will be no supply for the signals either. Also most underground lines also rely on compressed air to operate the trainstops and point machines. All these supplies come from substations dotted along the line. No supply in = no supply out. Most if not all stations now have a UPS back up system to supply lighting CCTV and PA systems for about 1 hour. After that runs down, complete and utter blackness. Bruce |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Peter Masson
writes But an electric train stranded out the line with no power is not going to go anywhere, whatever the signals say. Why should it have no power? If all the electrical staff deserted, as long as they didn't throw any switches, juice would still be on throughout the network. -- Clive. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 14:38:21 on Sat,
24 Feb 2007, Andrew Clark remarked: In the depot. The first thing you'd have done is cleared the running tracks. Without traction power? Can you explain why the many references to battery locos have escaped your attention? And who would clear the rolling stock, precisely? The Royal Household? That would have been done long before, when the lines were shut to the public. -- Roland Perry |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Roland Perry" wrote Can you explain why the many references to battery locos have escaped your attention? Not all the rolling stock is battery operated, is it? I was referring to the everyday clutter of hundreds of trains using the system. That would have been done long before, when the lines were shut to the public. You see, I think you have in mind some sort of orderly gradual transition from normality to emergency, when the government announces a problem and TfL responds by ordering all the LT staff to clear the system of rolling stock, and generally closes it all down neatly. I on the other hand don't think that any emergency likely to cause it necessary to make an emergency covert evacuation of VIPS from London is going to happen in such a way. Whether a missile strike, a dirty bomb or a germ scare, the transition time is likely to be extremely short, either minutes or a couple of hours, and tidying all the trains away to their depots is simply not going to be a priority either for TfL or LT staff - most of the latter will have other priorities. It might happen, of course, but the strong likelihood is that it won't, and the system will be abandoned in some state of disorder. This being the case, no sensible planner is going to choose the Tube as a route for VIP emergency evacuation: there is only a slim possibility that it could be so used, and there are far more reliable methods available. Incidentally, while LT is rightly proud of the transport continuity provided in some areas of London during the Blitz, in the East End a very large number of station staff, bus and train drivers and conductors abandoned their posts under fire. That sort of precedent suggests continuity of public transport service in London in an sudden-onset acute emergency cannot be expected. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Andrew Clark
writes That would have been done long before, when the lines were shut to the public. You see, I think you have in mind some sort of orderly gradual transition from normality to emergency, when the government announces a problem and TfL responds by ordering all the LT staff to clear the system of rolling stock, and generally closes it all down neatly. A good example of this was 7/7. Trains were abandoned all over the network. It was a day or two before they'd all been rounded up and put in their respective depots. -- Steve Fitzgerald has now left the building. You will find him in London's Docklands, E16, UK (please use the reply to address for email) |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 17:20:39 on Sat,
24 Feb 2007, Andrew Clark remarked: Can you explain why the many references to battery locos have escaped your attention? Not all the rolling stock is battery operated, is it? I was referring to the everyday clutter of hundreds of trains using the system. And I the special evacuation train. That would have been done long before, when the lines were shut to the public. You see, I think you have in mind some sort of orderly gradual transition from normality to emergency, Gradual enough, yes. -- Roland Perry |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Roland Perry" wrote in message ... In message , at 14:38:21 on Sat, 24 Feb 2007, Andrew Clark remarked: In the depot. The first thing you'd have done is cleared the running tracks. Without traction power? Can you explain why the many references to battery locos have escaped your attention? Not much use in using battery loco's or any other type of loco's if you have passenger trains on the main line that cannot move because of no power being available. How long will it take for a small number of battery loco's to drag thesse abandond trains out of the way? And who would clear the rolling stock, precisely? The Royal Household? That would have been done long before, when the lines were shut to the public. How? Roland Perry |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Plans approved to open Mail Rail 'secret Tube' as ride | London Transport | |||
Mail Rail: What is it like on the 'secret' Tube? | London Transport | |||
Secret tube station | London Transport | |||
LONDON BOMBS COVER-UP: BOMBS WERE UNDER TRAINS | London Transport | |||
LONDON BOMBS COVER-UP: BOMBS WERE UNDER TRAINS | London Transport |