Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
A friend went to Goodmayes station on Friday morning and asked for a single
to Southall, for which he was charged £5.10. He set off via Liverpool Street and Paddington but when he got to Southall he was told his ticket was invalid and he would have to pay again - £3.10. He explained that he had asked for a ticket to Southall and pointed out that the ticket included zone 4 (both Goodmayes and Southall being in zone 4.) No, he was told, it was only valid on the underground and he would have to pay again - £3.10 please! In that case, he asked, could he just pay from Ealing Broadway and was told that, as he had already admitted travelling from Paddington, the suggestion could trigger a £20 penalty charge! £20 or £3.10 - take your pick, he was told! He elected for the £3.10 option and, to add insult to injury, a comment from another passenger as he left the station made it clear that, in that person's eyes at least, he had been caught for fraudulently evading his fare! He is understandably livid and, when he told me about it, was going to take it up with 'one', who issued the ticket. However, I am not sure that this is the right way to go. His ticket is a Standard Day Single to U1234, valid by any available route and, on checking the NR website for details of the new zonal fare structure, I note that £5.10 is the correct fare for his journey, including the underground. I am assuming that the U in U1234 means that the ticket is also valid on the underground (to differentiate it from the £3.10 ticket which isn't) but, presumably, at Southall it is taken to mean that it is ONLY valid on the underground! Unless there is a way that he could have been sold the wrong ticket for the correct fare at Goodmayes, I feel he has been the victim of First Great Western incompetence and that it is to FGW that he should complain. Is my assumption correct? Terry |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 25, 2:20 pm, "Terry Casey" wrote:
I am assuming that the U in U1234 means that the ticket is also valid on the underground (to differentiate it from the £3.10 ticket which isn't) but, presumably, at Southall it is taken to mean that it is ONLY valid on the underground! Unless there is a way that he could have been sold the wrong ticket for the correct fare at Goodmayes, I feel he has been the victim of First Great Western incompetence and that it is to FGW that he should complain. Is my assumption correct? Terry But you can't get to Southall by underground! So unless the inspector was saying your friend should have taken the bus from Ealing Broadway he seems to have been spouting nonsense. I don't think it's 'one's' fault. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 14:20:00 GMT, "Terry Casey"
wrote: A friend went to Goodmayes station on Friday morning and asked for a single to Southall, for which he was charged £5.10. He set off via Liverpool Street and Paddington but when he got to Southall he was told his ticket was invalid and he would have to pay again - £3.10. He explained that he had asked for a ticket to Southall and pointed out that the ticket included zone 4 (both Goodmayes and Southall being in zone 4.) No, he was told, it was only valid on the underground and he would have to pay again - £3.10 please! In that case, he asked, could he just pay from Ealing Broadway and was told that, as he had already admitted travelling from Paddington, the suggestion could trigger a £20 penalty charge! £20 or £3.10 - take your pick, he was told! He elected for the £3.10 option and, to add insult to injury, a comment from another passenger as he left the station made it clear that, in that person's eyes at least, he had been caught for fraudulently evading his fare! He is understandably livid and, when he told me about it, was going to take it up with 'one', who issued the ticket. However, I am not sure that this is the right way to go. His ticket is a Standard Day Single to U1234, valid by any available route and, on checking the NR website for details of the new zonal fare structure, I note that £5.10 is the correct fare for his journey, including the underground. I am assuming that the U in U1234 means that the ticket is also valid on the underground (to differentiate it from the £3.10 ticket which isn't) but, presumably, at Southall it is taken to mean that it is ONLY valid on the underground! Unless there is a way that he could have been sold the wrong ticket for the correct fare at Goodmayes, I feel he has been the victim of First Great Western incompetence and that it is to FGW that he should complain. Is my assumption correct? Not 100% certain but from the details given and what I've read I would say he's been charged the right fare by "one" but issued the wrong ticket. At present prices are zonal but tickets are issued from "a to b" which means it should have said Goodmayes to Southall on it and not U1234. This ticket only gives validity to Liv St and then onto the LU network as far as zone 4. I think the FGW ticket person did the right thing (in terms of challenging the incorrectly issued ticket) based on the ticket description but was obviously not prepared to listen or show any discretion or even call up Goodmayes to ask if they had issued the ticket in question. I think the complaint goes to "one" re ticket issuing error and possibly to FGW if your friend considers his treatment to be rude or ill mannered. I'm not sure either company comes out of this very well. I also suspect the training on how to issue these revised tickets is not what it should be but then the whole thing is a complex nightmare - I could never do the job of a NR booking clerk. -- Paul C Admits to working for London Underground! |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Terry Casey" wrote in message ... A friend went to Goodmayes station on Friday morning and asked for a single to Southall, for which he was charged £5.10. He set off via Liverpool Street and Paddington but when he got to Southall he was told his ticket was invalid and he would have to pay again - £3.10. He explained that he had asked for a ticket to Southall and pointed out that the ticket included zone 4 (both Goodmayes and Southall being in zone 4.) No, he was told, it was only valid on the underground and he would have to pay again - £3.10 please! In that case, he asked, could he just pay from Ealing Broadway and was told that, as he had already admitted travelling from Paddington, the suggestion could trigger a £20 penalty charge! £20 or £3.10 - take your pick, he was told! He elected for the £3.10 option and, to add insult to injury, a comment from another passenger as he left the station made it clear that, in that person's eyes at least, he had been caught for fraudulently evading his fare! He is understandably livid and, when he told me about it, was going to take it up with 'one', who issued the ticket. However, I am not sure that this is the right way to go. His ticket is a Standard Day Single to U1234, valid by any available route and, on checking the NR website for details of the new zonal fare structure, I note that £5.10 is the correct fare for his journey, including the underground. I am assuming that the U in U1234 means that the ticket is also valid on the underground (to differentiate it from the £3.10 ticket which isn't) but, presumably, at Southall it is taken to mean that it is ONLY valid on the underground! Unless there is a way that he could have been sold the wrong ticket for the correct fare at Goodmayes, I feel he has been the victim of First Great Western incompetence and that it is to FGW that he should complain. Is my assumption correct? The correct ticket is a SDS Goodmayes - Southall for £5.10. A SDS Goodmayes - Zone U1234 is £4.40 and would only be valid at Underground stations in zone 4. So it seems that One sold the cheaper ticket at the more expensive price for some reason and they are at fault (although FGW probably should have given your friend the benefit of the doubt). Peter Smyth |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Terry Casey" wrote in message ... A friend went to Goodmayes station on Friday morning and asked for a single to Southall, for which he was charged £5.10. He set off via Liverpool Street and Paddington but when he got to Southall he was told his ticket was invalid and he would have to pay again - £3.10. He explained that he had asked for a ticket to Southall and pointed out that the ticket included zone 4 (both Goodmayes and Southall being in zone 4.) No, he was told, it was only valid on the underground and he would have to pay again - £3.10 please! In that case, he asked, could he just pay from Ealing Broadway and was told that, as he had already admitted travelling from Paddington, the suggestion could trigger a £20 penalty charge! £20 or £3.10 - take your pick, he was told! He elected for the £3.10 option and, to add insult to injury, a comment from another passenger as he left the station made it clear that, in that person's eyes at least, he had been caught for fraudulently evading his fare! He is understandably livid and, when he told me about it, was going to take it up with 'one', who issued the ticket. However, I am not sure that this is the right way to go. His ticket is a Standard Day Single to U1234, valid by any available route and, on checking the NR website for details of the new zonal fare structure, I note that £5.10 is the correct fare for his journey, including the underground. I am assuming that the U in U1234 means that the ticket is also valid on the underground (to differentiate it from the £3.10 ticket which isn't) but, presumably, at Southall it is taken to mean that it is ONLY valid on the underground! Unless there is a way that he could have been sold the wrong ticket for the correct fare at Goodmayes, I feel he has been the victim of First Great Western incompetence and that it is to FGW that he should complain. Is my assumption correct? IMHO the fault lies with 'one'. The Goodmayes ticket office sold him the wrong ticket, though at the right fare. His ticket should have been a Goodmayes to Southall single, priced as including LUL, and should have had the maltese cross to show LUL validity (and encoded to work LUL ticket gates). Perhaps the ticket clerk thought Sothall was an LUL station, or perhaps he had not been trained as to how to issue a zonal fare ticket to a specified National Rail station where the journey also involved LUL travel. The information about zonal fares is he http://www.nationalrail.co.uk/times_...onalFares.html Peter |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 25, 2:34�pm, wrote:
On Feb 25, 2:20 pm, "Terry Casey" wrote: I am assuming that the U in U1234 means that the ticket is also valid on the underground (to differentiate it from the £3.10 ticket which isn't) but, presumably, at Southall it is taken to mean that it is ONLY valid on the underground! Unless there is a way that he could have been sold the wrong ticket for the correct fare at Goodmayes, I feel he has been the victim of First Great Western incompetence and that it is to FGW that he should complain. Is my assumption correct? Terry But you can't get to Southall by underground! So unless the inspector was saying your friend should have taken the bus from Ealing Broadway he seems to have been spouting nonsense. I don't think it's 'one's' fault. It depends what was asked for. If he asked for "a single to Southall" at Goodmayes, the ticket should have said "From GOODMAYES To SOUTHALL Route + Any Permitted", and would have cost �5.10. If the final destination is an NR station then the actual station (or, occasionally station group, eg Croydon) must be shown on the ticket. What the purchaser was sold was a ticket to U1234, ie from Goodmayes to a final destination on the Underground in zone 4, involving an Underground journey through zones 1-4, for example Goodmayes to Perivale. Since the introduction of Zonal fares, the cost is the same, but the validity is different. FGW do not get any money from the U1234 ticket, so, quite rightly, they refused the ticket. As I don't know what exactly was asked for, although the OP did say the words "Underground" and "Zone 4" were mentioned, it's difficult to know who was at fault. I suspect, however, that the booking clerk, on hearing the words "Southall in Zone 4", assumed that Southall was on the Underground and sold that ticket. Incidentally, if it was after 0930, a zone 1-4 ODTC at �5.70 may have been a better value option. Moral of the story: Keep it simple. If you want a single to Southall, say so. Don't confuse matters by mentioning zones or the Underground. If an Underground transfer is required, the ticket issuing system will know this. Ken |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Smyth" wrote in message ... "Terry Casey" wrote in message ... A friend went to Goodmayes station on Friday morning and asked for a single to Southall, for which he was charged £5.10. He set off via Liverpool Street and Paddington but when he got to Southall he was told his ticket was invalid and he would have to pay again - £3.10. He explained that he had asked for a ticket to Southall and pointed out that the ticket included zone 4 (both Goodmayes and Southall being in zone 4.) No, he was told, it was only valid on the underground and he would have to pay again - £3.10 please! In that case, he asked, could he just pay from Ealing Broadway and was told that, as he had already admitted travelling from Paddington, the suggestion could trigger a £20 penalty charge! £20 or £3.10 - take your pick, he was told! He elected for the £3.10 option and, to add insult to injury, a comment from another passenger as he left the station made it clear that, in that person's eyes at least, he had been caught for fraudulently evading his fare! He is understandably livid and, when he told me about it, was going to take it up with 'one', who issued the ticket. However, I am not sure that this is the right way to go. His ticket is a Standard Day Single to U1234, valid by any available route and, on checking the NR website for details of the new zonal fare structure, I note that £5.10 is the correct fare for his journey, including the underground. I am assuming that the U in U1234 means that the ticket is also valid on the underground (to differentiate it from the £3.10 ticket which isn't) but, presumably, at Southall it is taken to mean that it is ONLY valid on the underground! Unless there is a way that he could have been sold the wrong ticket for the correct fare at Goodmayes, I feel he has been the victim of First Great Western incompetence and that it is to FGW that he should complain. Is my assumption correct? The correct ticket is a SDS Goodmayes - Southall for £5.10. A SDS Goodmayes - Zone U1234 is £4.40 and would only be valid at Underground stations in zone 4. So it seems that One sold the cheaper ticket at the more expensive price for some reason and they are at fault (although FGW probably should have given your friend the benefit of the doubt). Peter Smyth I took the details off the ticket itself and it definitely shows the price as £5.10 - surely it would be impossible to issue the wrong ticket at the correct price (unless there is a software problem or programming error.) Terry |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 14:20:00 GMT, "Terry Casey"
wrote: A friend went to Goodmayes station on Friday morning and asked for a single to Southall, for which he was charged £5.10. He set off via Liverpool Street and Paddington but when he got to Southall he was told his ticket was invalid and he would have to pay again - £3.10. He explained that he had asked for a ticket to Southall and pointed out that the ticket included zone 4 (both Goodmayes and Southall being in zone 4.) No, he was told, it was only valid on the underground and he would have to pay again - £3.10 please! In that case, he asked, could he just pay from Ealing Broadway and was told that, as he had already admitted travelling from Paddington, the suggestion could trigger a £20 penalty charge! £20 or £3.10 - take your pick, he was told! He elected for the £3.10 option and, to add insult to injury, a comment from another passenger as he left the station made it clear that, in that person's eyes at least, he had been caught for fraudulently evading his fare! He should have refused. If any action was taken he should have sued. He is understandably livid and, when he told me about it, was going to take it up with 'one', who issued the ticket. However, I am not sure that this is the right way to go. His ticket is a Standard Day Single to U1234, valid by any available route and, on checking the NR website for details of the new zonal fare structure, I note that £5.10 is the correct fare for his journey, including the underground. I am assuming that the U in U1234 means that the ticket is also valid on the underground (to differentiate it from the £3.10 ticket which isn't) but, presumably, at Southall it is taken to mean that it is ONLY valid on the underground! Unless there is a way that he could have been sold the wrong ticket for the correct fare at Goodmayes, I feel he has been the victim of First Great Western incompetence and that it is to FGW that he should complain. Is my assumption correct? I would think so. Which is why he would have won his case - with costs. Terry |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ken" wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 25, 2:34?pm, wrote: As I don't know what exactly was asked for, although the OP did say the words "Underground" and "Zone 4" were mentioned, it's difficult to know who was at fault. I suspect, however, that the booking clerk, on hearing the words "Southall in Zone 4", assumed that Southall was on the Underground and sold that ticket. Incidentally, if it was after 0930, a zone 1-4 ODTC at ?5.70 may have been a better value option. Moral of the story: Keep it simple. If you want a single to Southall, say so. Don't confuse matters by mentioning zones or the Underground. If an Underground transfer is required, the ticket issuing system will know this. Ken ------------------------------ My friend asked for a single to Southall, nothing more (at 0720). It was the inspector at Southall who first used the word "Underground" and only then did my friend refer to the zones printed on the ticket, so there was no customer confusion at the Goodmayes end! Terry |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Terry Casey wrote:
A friend went to Goodmayes station on Friday morning and asked for a single to Southall, for which he was charged £5.10. He set off via Liverpool Street and Paddington but when he got to Southall he was told his ticket was invalid and he would have to pay again - £3.10. snip Unless there is a way that he could have been sold the wrong ticket for the correct fare at Goodmayes, I feel he has been the victim of First Great Western incompetence and that it is to FGW that he should complain. Is my assumption correct? The trouble here is the introduction of zonal ticketing within the Travelcard Area and an associated lack of training. There are two different types of zonal fares that apply now. First up, you have the "rail only" zonal fares, and then there are the "Train-Tube" fares. The latter are the only variety valid on the tube and are issued from the origin station to the appropriate zonal combination (or vice versa). So, in this example, your friend was issued precisely the correct ticket (namely Goodmayes to U1234), and the member of staff at Southall was talking through his backside. Other examples: Surbiton to Maryland would be issued as Surbiton to U1256 Selhurst to Holborn as Selhurst to U1234 Victoria to Morden via Balham as London Terminals to U1234 It's covered in Section L of the National Fares Manual, which can be downloaded via the ATOC site. [1] HTH, Barry [1] https://www.atoc.org/retail/_downloads/NFM95/NFM95_Common_L.pdf |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Another Oyster Rip-off | London Transport | |||
2for1 Ticket Rip-off | London Transport | |||
Zonal Fare Exceptions | London Transport | |||
Microsoft's rip-off of Google Earth | London Transport | |||
Southern "Fare Pal" / zonal fares | London Transport |