Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() John B wrote: On Mar 6, 1:00 pm, "Andrea" wrote: I have travelled several times on the Silverlink Gospel Oak to Barking service in the past fortnight. What has shocked me is the apparent large-scale fare evasion on this route. I imagine most legitimate travellers will have period tickets, and therefore it will be pretty hard to judge whether or not they are evading fares. There is always a guard present on the train but he/she never materialises to check tickets. It isn't feasible for guards to do ticket inspections on lines like the NLL/Goblin, where loadings are tight and stops are only a few minutes apart - indeed AIUI Silverlink Metro guards aren't even revenue trained. I'm hoping London Overground will adopt the DOO route and redeploy surplus guards into revenue protection (given that LO trains have much the same passenger characteristics as LU, where DOO works just fine). But RPIs aren't much use when a train is full-and- standing. Goblin is different though John. Unless things have changed very recently it is not part of Silverlink's penalty fare scheme. I'm not sure what the current situation is regarding ticket issuing facilities at Goblin stations, which are largely unmanned, but I believe in the past some stations didn't have ticket machines. I'm no expert on Gospel Oak - Barking line, but I have used it a number of times - there are conductors/guards on board who check and sell tickets, but I think I've been on board Goblin trains where there hasn't been a conductor. I don't know if the line is capable of DOO or not though. I have heard dozens of people say that they never buy tickets as there is no deterrent factor (many stations are open and unstaffed, e.g. Leytonstone High Road). Dozens? Did you carry out a survey or something? Access from the overground to the underground at Blackhorse Road os open, so anybody can access the underground without a ticket. ...which is useful if they want to go to Finsbury Park, but otherwise not much help, since every other plausible destination is barriered during the day (OK, possibly you could go to Chigwell or Chesham). It really annoys me when Silverlink seems to be doing nothing about this. Talking to several fare-paying regulars on this line, ticketless travel is rife. Silverlink recently imposed a penalty fare scheme, which sounds rather unlike "doing nothing about this". Silverlink Metro bizarrely didn't even operate a Penalty Fares scheme until January or February 2006! I think I've read that perhaps they used to operate one, perhaps in their previous guise as North London Railways (the immediate post-privatisation franchise), but stopped for some reason. Anyway Silverlink Metro's idea of revenue protection is pretty shabby. I use the NLL fairly often and I've never had my ticket checked on board, nor at any ungated station. Willesden Junction is the one exception - there's often a team of RPIs in the passage checking tickets of those interchanging between the high level (NLL and WLL) platforms and the low level DC (Bakerloo and Euston-Watford) platforms. Northbound trains in the morning also tend to be cancelled, leaving many customers unable to board at imtermediate stations, such as Leytonstone, due to the 2 carriage train being full. Northbound? I'd tend to say "westbound" myself... anyway, yes, this sucks [both the short trains and the relative unreliability] and is a common problem on NLL/GOBLIN services. I'm deeply sceptical that better revenue protection would make much of a difference to # of pax though - how many people genuinely travel in the peak just for the hell of it? TfL hopes to provide more trains on Goblin, and longer term plans include electrifying the line, though as this would require loot from central government I'd advise you not to hold your breath! I hope tFL will take a hard line on the revenut side of things when they take over this line later this year. I hope they take a hard line on the revenue issue off-peak, because of the knock-on security implications (ie antisocialists tend to travel without tickets, and there are too many of them on the GOBLIN and NLL - although they wisely avoid peak services). If it's cost-effective to provide gates etc to enforce payment on-peak, I hope they do that too; if it isn't then I'd rather they spent our money on improving the service... Antisocialists - what a word! Yes I broadly agree with your notions above. Gates aren't going to be practical anyway at a good number of locations where there isn't a station building. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mizter T wrote:
Goblin is different though John. Unless things have changed very recently it is not part of Silverlink's penalty fare scheme. I'm not sure what the current situation is regarding ticket issuing facilities at Goblin stations, which are largely unmanned, but I believe in the past some stations didn't have ticket machines. I believe this is still the case - there certainly wasn't one at Wanstead Park or Woodgrange Park when I last looked. Antisocialists - what a word! Yes I broadly agree with your notions above. Gates aren't going to be practical anyway at a good number of locations where there isn't a station building. Or even then - most of the stations have steps up or down to street level from each platform. I can't imagine where you could put a barrier there - especially since if the line is to get longer trains the entire platforms will be needed. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Barking - Gospel Oak line | London Transport | |||
Barking - Gospel Oak line | London Transport | |||
Gospel Oak - Barking | London Transport | |||
Gospel Oak - Barking | London Transport |