Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Were they "real" police or "plastic" community support officers? What do you mean by "plastic"? IMHO they had usual police hats and clothes, then again - I'm ignorant immigrant who had never have any contact with the police before... The main issue is to check with the station supervisor so they know you are there and can provide any requisite local knowledge. Seems a bit unreasonable - if all anoraks will start contacting station supervisors, when would they do their work? |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
alex_t wrote:
Were they "real" police or "plastic" community support officers? What do you mean by "plastic"? IMHO they had usual police hats and clothes, then again - I'm ignorant immigrant who had never have any contact with the police before... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Police_...upport_Officer -- Michael Hoffman |
#33
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Police_...upport_Officer Thank you for the link, now I can see that they were (most likely) PCSOs... at least colours were as described in the article + high visibility clothing... :-/ |
#34
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
alex_t wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Police_...upport_Officer Thank you for the link, now I can see that they were (most likely) PCSOs... at least colours were as described in the article + high visibility clothing... :-/ But constables also wear high-vis clothing and similar colors. You can tell a PCSO because their clothing will be labeled COMMUNITY SUPPORT OFFICER in addition or instead of POLICE. -- Michael Hoffman |
#35
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12 Mar 2007 09:49:59 -0700, "alex_t"
wrote: Were they "real" police or "plastic" community support officers? What do you mean by "plastic"? IMHO they had usual police hats and clothes, then again - I'm ignorant immigrant who had never have any contact with the police before... Yes they look like policemen and we're supposed to believe that they are policemen but they aren't. In my experience they are probably well meaning people trying to do their bit for society but some are a bit too stupid or arrogant for their own good. They therefore like to believe they have "power" over individuals going about their business and the stupid ones then believe they are doing their job by making treating the public, who they are to serve, like morons. My own encounter with such an idiot has soured my view of community support officers. Stories from a range of other people simply confirm my worst suspicions. I say this despite being fully aware of the current security issues and concerns. Almost all properly trained policemen and women are capable of exercising appropriate discretion, judgement and civility in their dealings with the public. This way they get the respect they deserve in return. If I had the choice of 1,000 properly trained policemen vs 2,500 community support officers I'd go for the 1,000 policemen every time. The main issue is to check with the station supervisor so they know you are there and can provide any requisite local knowledge. Seems a bit unreasonable - if all anoraks will start contacting station supervisors, when would they do their work? It is not at all unreasonable - it is the minimum sensible thing to do. Most supervisors will be perfectly amenable and will be pleased that someone has taken the trouble to identify themselves and to ask the right questions/ obtain permission. It saves a lot of work and hassle compared to having to deal with someone wandering around but obviously not catching a train. Some of our better supervisors would probably point out the best things to take a picture of if they are at one of our more photogenic stations. -- Paul C Admits to working for London Underground! |
#36
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() But constables also wear high-vis clothing and similar colors. You can tell a PCSO because their clothing will be labeled COMMUNITY SUPPORT OFFICER in addition or instead of POLICE. Well, then I have no idea - unfortunately I did not read the labels ![]() |
#37
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 06:20:56PM +0000, Paul Corfield wrote:
Almost all properly trained policemen and women are capable of exercising appropriate discretion, judgement and civility in their dealings with the public. They are? Coulda fooled me. The impression I've got from dealing with the filth a few times is that people only join the police because they're too stupid to do anything productive and too nasty to be allowed to join the army. It comes as a pleasant surprise when the occasional officer turns out to not fit that, but they are few and far between. This way they get the respect they deserve in return. Oh they certainly get the respect from me that they deserve. If I had the choice of 1,000 properly trained policemen vs 2,500 community support officers I'd go for the 1,000 policemen every time. Indeed. 1500 fewer arseholes in uniform has to be a good thing. -- David Cantrell | Cake Smuggler Extraordinaire Longum iter est per praecepta, breve et efficax per exempla. |
#38
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() If I had the choice of 1,000 properly trained policemen vs 2,500 community support officers I'd go for the 1,000 policemen every time. Oh, well... It is not at all unreasonable - it is the minimum sensible thing to do. Well, I'll try next time :-) I'm not sure where to search for station supervisors though - I suppose they are not the people, who stand at the platforms and try to control the passenger flow... oops, I mean... the *customer* flow. |
#39
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
alex_t wrote:
If I had the choice of 1,000 properly trained policemen vs 2,500 community support officers I'd go for the 1,000 policemen every time. Oh, well... It is not at all unreasonable - it is the minimum sensible thing to do. Well, I'll try next time :-) I'm not sure where to search for station supervisors though - I suppose they are not the people, who stand at the platforms and try to control the passenger flow... oops, I mean... the *customer* flow. I'm sure any staff member in the station will know, though ![]() -- Michael Hoffman |
#40
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() • take flash photographs and/or use a tripod or other camera support equipment ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^ Last year for a non-commercial photo project I was doing I asked if I could use a tripod at East Putney Station because I wanted to take long exposure photo as a train came into the station. They said yes - provided It was not at rush-hour. I did not obstruct anybody I did not use flash I kept all equipment behind the yellow line. I was quite happy to comply with these conditions and had a good chat with the station manager who was keen on photography himself. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Photography on London Underground - yes, it's allowed | London Transport | |||
Photography crackdown on London Underground? - AmateurPhotographer | London Transport | |||
This Photography Lark is Getting Ridiculous | London Transport | |||
Idea (LU photography permits) | London Transport | |||
Photography on LU | London Transport |