Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 30 Mar 2007 03:18:34 -0700, "chunky munky"
wrote: The D&A Policy is applied to all LUL (and I guess TfL) staff. The amount of alcohol allowed in your system when booking on for duty is zero. The difference is that operational staff can get the sack, be prosecuted and possibly be given a custodial sentance, whereas "office staff" will most likely just be dismissed. Also for LU Operational staff, if you are on any medication. You must inform your manager/supervisor before starting work. If you are D&A tested, and on the "prohibited for safety-critical" you could well be in the brown stuff. And for any job the management must treat alcoholism as a disease rather than a disciplinary matter. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Under LU rules a random or "for cause" D&A test is always supervised
by a senior grade, I'm presuming the LU system was adopted by TFL (which took over many civil service personnel who were previously not under such draconian rules!). In Kiley's case who would the supervising senior person be? As an aside, a friend of mine absorbed into TFL Streets from the DoT turned down a staff pass for a number of years to remain on civil service conditions and thus still be able to have a drink at lunchtime (*not* to get drunk I might add!). |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ken wrote:
On 30 Mar 2007 03:18:34 -0700, "chunky munky" wrote: The D&A Policy is applied to all LUL (and I guess TfL) staff. The amount of alcohol allowed in your system when booking on for duty is zero. The difference is that operational staff can get the sack, be prosecuted and possibly be given a custodial sentance, whereas "office staff" will most likely just be dismissed. Also for LU Operational staff, if you are on any medication. You must inform your manager/supervisor before starting work. If you are D&A tested, and on the "prohibited for safety-critical" you could well be in the brown stuff. And for any job the management must treat alcoholism as a disease rather than a disciplinary matter. Really? I understood that for legal purposes (such as disability discrimination law) alcoholism and other drug addictions were excluded unless they result from another disease (for instance someone with an addiction to pain killers resulting from being prescribed them to cure another disease could claim that the addiction is a disease for employment law purposes). -- Each day a man watched a donkey walk past a high wood fence with one plank removed. Each day he saw a nose, then the ears, then the neck, forequarters, back and finally the tail. He pondered this for a time and eventually declared. “I understand now. The nose causes the tail” |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Alcohol on Barking station, etc. | London Transport | |||
Johnson unveils Tube alcohol ban | London Transport | |||
F&*&%^& toilets | London Transport | |||
Alcohol | London Transport | |||
London Underground - London Assembly Transport Policy Committee Chair responds | London Transport |