Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 3, 8:20 am, Graeme Wall wrote:
I was under the impression that Basingstoke was one of the 13, hence the elimination of the Southampton boxes about 1980. Southampton went under Eastleigh in c.1981 not under Basingstoke. I think there was maybe one to be located at Basingstoke or Eastleigh but also I think in neither case would it have been the 1966/1967 box directly - but a replacement or considerably expanded facility. -- Nick |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 3, 10:18 am, "BH Williams" wrote:
'Dartford' is a workstation at Ashford IECC, as is the CTRL . Brian I did not know that abotu Dartford, although I did about CTRl. When did Dartford PSB close ? -- Nick |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message om
"D7666" wrote: On Apr 3, 8:20 am, Graeme Wall wrote: I was under the impression that Basingstoke was one of the 13, hence the elimination of the Southampton boxes about 1980. Southampton went under Eastleigh in c.1981 not under Basingstoke. Doh! I meant Eastleigh, sorry, I was thinking about the coming works at Basingstoke and it stuck in my mind. I think there was maybe one to be located at Basingstoke or Eastleigh but also I think in neither case would it have been the 1966/1967 box directly - but a replacement or considerably expanded facility. I'm pretty certain Eastleigh was one of the '13'. -- Graeme Wall This address is not read, substitute trains for rail. Transport Miscellany at http://www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail/index.html |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Graeme Wall wrote:
In message .com "D7666" wrote: On Apr 3, 2:11 am, "MaxB" wrote: wrote in message ups.com...I know the SR had a plan in the 70's to have 13 PSB's for the whole region can anyone shed some light, plan did not happen as such. I don't know if it was ever finished, but London Bridge, Victoria (Clapham Jn) and Ashford were all part of it. I agree it certainly started but was not finished. The Central Division (mainly) boxes LB, VA, Three Bridges were certainly three of them - but I think that was it. I am not so sure Ashford was one - maybe if so it would have been much extended. ISTR Ashford was older, resignalled under Kent Coast Phase II, and like Eastleigh and Basingstoke and other 1960s boxes pre-dated the 13 box scheme, and replaced by a new one/s or the equipment/s supplanted. Then what went into Ashford was - by the time it was done - was no longer part of the 13 box scheme. I was under the impression that Basingstoke was one of the 13, hence the elimination of the Southampton boxes about 1980. sneaky plug For a touch of LSWR/SR nostalgia my Southampton signal box pages are at http://www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail/sigbox/sigbox.htm Interesting site. Hope you don't mind my linking to it from the relevant pages of my website? http://www.conceptcrafts.co.uk/britishrailways1960 |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 3, 10:47 am, "D7666" wrote:
On Apr 3, 8:20 am, Graeme Wall wrote: I was under the impression that Basingstoke was one of the 13, hence the elimination of the Southampton boxes about 1980. Southampton went under Eastleigh in c.1981 not under Basingstoke. Although since posting that I see you refer to Southampton to Eastleigh on your web pages - but I can't quite see where ''... Basingstoke was one of the 13, hence the elimination of the Southampton boxes ...'' comes in to play. -- Nick |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Graeme Wall" wrote in message ... In message om "D7666" wrote: On Apr 3, 8:20 am, Graeme Wall wrote: I was under the impression that Basingstoke was one of the 13, hence the elimination of the Southampton boxes about 1980. Southampton went under Eastleigh in c.1981 not under Basingstoke. Doh! I meant Eastleigh, sorry, I was thinking about the coming works at Basingstoke and it stuck in my mind. I think there was maybe one to be located at Basingstoke or Eastleigh but also I think in neither case would it have been the 1966/1967 box directly - but a replacement or considerably expanded facility. I'm pretty certain Eastleigh was one of the '13'. -- Graeme Wall This address is not read, substitute trains for rail. Transport Miscellany at http://www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail/index.html I have the 'Yellow Peril' for that in the loft does that make me sad |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "D7666" wrote in message oups.com... On Apr 3, 10:18 am, "BH Williams" wrote: 'Dartford' is a workstation at Ashford IECC, as is the CTRL . Brian I did not know that abotu Dartford, although I did about CTRl. When did Dartford PSB close ? -- Nick Did it ever open? I thought the 'box was the one at Gillingham, by the depot- this was never fitted out, as the IECC at Ashford had sufficent capacity to accomodate the functions.The North Kent signals do still bear the NK prefix, however. Even now, with all the other bits added on to the original SER mainline, there still seems to be space at Ashford for more. Brian |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 3, 8:20 am, Graeme Wall wrote:
http://www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail/sigbox/sigbox.htm Digressing, my default browser is Mozilla 1.7.13. When I got to the above URL there appear to be no active links anywhere in the page. Dragging my mouse over the entire page shows no hyperlinks at all. If I look at the HTML source, there are tags in there that I do not recognise, and tags that I would normally expect to see are not present - - - although my knowledge of HTML is far from expert, and I accept there are sometimes different ways of acheivng the same thing. If I open the same page in M$ Internet Explorer, I see the hyperlinks which work as expected. Mozilla 1.7.13 is the highest (well as at last weekend anyway) released version apart from any beta test versions that may be out there, so it is not a question of me needing to upgade. -- Nick |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
"8sub" wrote: "Graeme Wall" wrote in message ... In message om "D7666" wrote: On Apr 3, 8:20 am, Graeme Wall wrote: I was under the impression that Basingstoke was one of the 13, hence the elimination of the Southampton boxes about 1980. Southampton went under Eastleigh in c.1981 not under Basingstoke. Doh! I meant Eastleigh, sorry, I was thinking about the coming works at Basingstoke and it stuck in my mind. I think there was maybe one to be located at Basingstoke or Eastleigh but also I think in neither case would it have been the 1966/1967 box directly - but a replacement or considerably expanded facility. I'm pretty certain Eastleigh was one of the '13'. -- Graeme Wall This address is not read, substitute trains for rail. Transport Miscellany at http://www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail/index.html I have the 'Yellow Peril' for that in the loft does that make me sad Very, just like the rest of us :-) -- Graeme Wall This address is not read, substitute trains for rail. Transport Miscellany at http://www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail/index.html |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
Brian Robertson wrote: Graeme Wall wrote: [snip] sneaky plug For a touch of LSWR/SR nostalgia my Southampton signal box pages are at http://www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail/sigbox/sigbox.htm Interesting site. Hope you don't mind my linking to it from the relevant pages of my website? http://www.conceptcrafts.co.uk/britishrailways1960 Feel free. -- Graeme Wall This address is not read, substitute trains for rail. Transport Miscellany at http://www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail/index.html |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Box Signal Box and Junction Road Junction | London Transport | |||
Southern keen to run pilot Oyster scheme | London Transport | |||
Thameslink 'BOX' | London Transport | |||
Box Junction Victory? | London Transport | |||
Box Junction Penalty | London Transport |